It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ב,א משנה

the one who purchased transgresses ??? of some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger ??? to him despite the fact that is not permission ??? to him ??? from him who gives to him ??? is exempt from ??? as it is said ??? but not with others

דף ב,א גמרא

all Behold! why do I have It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was a Tanna taught: the purchaser ??? It is because of this: that he came ??? to it to "Kedushah", but: sell that he came ??? to it ??? I would say ??? Come and learn from this. ??? to him why do I have To exclude from that of Rabbi Yehudah for he said: ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger ??? Come and hear from this. ??? from ??? Why do I need It is because of this: that he came he is required ??? who gives to him ??? who gives to him ??? why do I have It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because the essence livestock of Israel She ??? Perhaps will come ??? Come and hear from this. It was taught there: R' Yehudah permits in the case of lame en Beteira permits ??? They posed this difficulty: transgresses What do I have to learn from R' Yehudah said: The reason is with R' Yehudah there i.e., in another mishna who permits It is because of this: ??? transgresses also that was lame he or, perhaps, ??? Is this not we were ??? but: transgresses immediately ??? Is this not that was lame he Come and hear: ??? to him even though that is not permission and not ??? R' Yehudah ??? to him ??? from him who gives to him ??? that is not The tanna teaches: Here, too, that is not ??? except ??? and not The tanna teaches: So, here, ??? and not ??? Come and hear: R' Yehuda says: ??? livestock from ??? and she gave birth to elevate that specific ??? he gives ??? who gives to him ??? even though that is not permission ??? that specific until ten ??? he gives all ???

דף ב,ב גמרא

Is this not ??? No. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The tanna teaches: It was taught by ??? Hey, isn't it the case that he gives all ??? The tanna teaches: and if livestock a priest What then does it mean when it says ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? for him livestock ??? for him ??? for him ??? Rav Ashi said Come and hear: Rabbi Yehudah permits in the case of lame because of that is not would find it possible ??? this one would find it possible ??? Hey, isn't it the case that transgresses also ??? he is equivalent. Learn from this and there is someone who teaches this as referring ??? to him despite the fact that is not permission Let us say, ??? does not rule like Rabbi Yehudah For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Yehudah permits in the case of lame even if you say it’s Rabbi Yehudah, ??? Is this not we were ??? transgresses we were ??? Come and hear: Rabbi Yehudah says ??? livestock from ??? and she gave birth to elevate that specific ??? he gives ??? who gives to him ??? despite the fact that is not permission ??? that specific until ten ??? he gives all ??? Is this not ??? No. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The tanna teaches: It was taught by ??? Hey, isn't it the case that he gives all ??? The tanna teaches: and if livestock a priest What then does it mean when it says ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? livestock ??? for him ??? for him ??? Rav Ashi said Come and hear: R' Yehudah permits in the case of lame because of that is not would find it possible ??? this one would find it possible ??? is forbidden and that one also ??? he is equivalent. Learn from this They posed this difficulty: ??? livestock ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? according to R' Yehudah ??? According to the sages, ??? to Rabbi Yehudah Up to this point, No. ??? Sarai R' Yehudah except in the case of lame that is not We come to compare ??? but: Solomon That it comes ??? or, perhaps, for just as ??? which was divided by of him and all the more so Solomon that is not a division from of him ??? According to the sages, Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis except in the case of lame which was divided by of him but: Solomon that is not a division from of him ??? or, perhaps, for just as ??? that is not We come to compare ??? and all the more so Solomon That it comes ??? and the reason is a law established by the Rabbis It is because of this: thus he For it was taught: They said to him: to Rabbi Yehudah Is it not the case that ??? upon it and she will give birth Perhaps, It is because of this: ??? he thus ??? The reason is ??? It is because of this: That it comes ??? except What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? It is because of this: ??? would find it possible ??? like who ??? he is equivalent. Is it not the case that ??? upon it and she will give birth And because of the fact ??? upon it and she will give birth ??? to it and he said to them ??? that is not ??? male, Come and hear: who gives to him ??? and not The tanna teaches: despite the fact that is not permission ??? to him that is not The tanna teaches: Here, too, ??? for this statement that The father of Shmuel said poses a contradiction: is forbidden to a person ??? with ??? lest ??? to him ??? and "to him has sworn at the Name by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry are his and the Torah he said (Ex. 23) No. Watch out for leading vav "And on heard ??? except a Tanna taught: ??? and it is the law ??? So, here, a Tanna taught: ??? and it is the law ??? and what is the difference here, ??? She Come and hear: Rabbi Yehudah says ??? livestock from ??? and she gave birth to elevate that specific ??? he gives ??? who gives ??? despite the fact that is not permission ??? that specific until ten ??? he gives all ??? But the sages say: The whole time ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile in the midst of ??? from ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.