It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

Is this not ??? No. ??? also where he teaches ??? that specific until ten ??? Learn from this ??? for he said: ??? livestock that is large some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? that specific until ten ??? or This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ Come and hear: for he said: Rabbi Yehoshua son of Levi ??? his male slave some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? that specific until hundred ??? that I a slave ??? day and day ??? for him ??? and there are that they said Raysh Lakish said ??? livestock that is large some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? that specific until hundred ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: who gives to him ??? even though that is not permission ??? that specific until ten ??? a division from of him ??? No. a division from of him ??? or This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ Come and hear: for he said: R' Yehoshua son of Levi ??? his male slave some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? that specific until ten ??? that I a slave that is not he returns for him livestock What is the reason? It is because of this: that he came ??? for him ??? one except a slave the validity that is not found. She and all the validity that is not found. No. ??? of him. ??? But the sages say: The whole time ??? Rabbi Yehoshua said: and both of them, the written Torah one do they expound, (Ex. 13) all first-born rabbis reason that first-born a small portion of first-born ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: all until That there are completely And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned first-born completely first-born ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: all that even all ??? If you wish, I would say everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world first-born ??? one master reasons that all ??? he came and one master reasons that ??? he came and how much time is the duration of shall be ??? of some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and shall be ??? from ??? Rav Huna said even ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? and let us say, for him ??? it was said: Rav Chisda he said a thing which does that specific ??? And Rabba said a thing which does that specific ??? about what do they disagree? ??? raw lit., living for one for he said: a thing which does that specific ??? his reasoning is ??? It is not raw lit., living and for one for he said: a thing which does that specific ??? but: ??? raw lit., living ??? rabbis in front of Rav ??? this one For Rav Huna and Rav Chisda and Raba does not disagree this one in it this one ??? He said to them Rav ??? what is the difference here, in it ??? all first-born there is not in this case. of its mother also in the case of (Ex. 34) all ??? there is not in this case. except there is no difference He disagreed with this Master, son of Rav Ashi what is the difference here, ??? that even for the sake of ??? My son, ??? my sanctity As Mar said: (Ex. 13) he exempted ??? livestock ??? there i.e., in another mishna immediately that is not ??? in them? Those who are ill ??? in them? ??? all first-born Here in this case, immediately ??? in them? Those who are ill No. ??? in them? all first-born R' Elazar Not on to the house of study he found to Rabbi ??? He said to him What then does it mean when it says say rabbis among ??? He said to him

דף ג,ב גמרא

Thus said Rabbi Yochanan Even if ??? Rachel ??? Rachel ??? from ??? and if there are in it a small portion of signs he is liable ??? you shall ??? upon it This is satisfactory ??? Come and hear from this Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? and To exclude ??? and Raba except ??? What then does it mean when it says Come and hear from this ??? it was. for him ??? and his mouth ??? Behold! this ??? And if you say there i.e., in another mishna ??? In the matter that do not ??? Here in this case, ??? In the matter ??? Here, too, ??? One that is large and one a small one and it was taught that is large that is large ??? and a small one a small one ??? This is satisfactory a small one ??? yes. ??? except that is large ??? there are ??? except Is this not It is because of this: ??? immediately ??? it was. for him ??? No. It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? Here, too, ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? these between ??? between ??? invalidate it ??? about them a person ??? that are large ??? regarding a person it is written: (Lev. 22) a man a man ??? a man the value of ??? of ??? but: livestock ??? that are large ??? also shall not be ??? One that is large and one a small one What is the reason? If it was It is because of this: who changes even ??? that are large ??? also except Is this not It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? No. In reality lit: In the world I would say to you It is because of this: who changes who changes you shall ??? and that he came it is a problem to you even ??? that are large ??? there i.e., in another mishna If it was ??? he is required ??? If it was ??? he is required ??? this particular ??? where they did ??? to it my brother ??? in front of Raba he said to it ??? to it about this teaching of Rabbi Yehudah for he said: ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? Rav ??? son of Rachel ??? for him this particular ??? it was. ??? some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? them ??? and the blessing of the Service and he will give them to the priests ??? of Rav ??? son of Rachel And so based on this lit: from after, ??? them ??? and the blessing of the Service and he will give them to the priests why is it that ??? them ??? some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? Perhaps will come in them? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? If so, What is the reason? in its entirety ??? of Rav ??? It is because of this: ??? them ??? For didn't Rav Yehudah say is permitted. to a person ??? before that went out ??? the world. there i.e., in another mishna ??? An altar of ??? for him ??? a priest No. ??? for him Here in this case, Even if ??? a priest ??? for him And if you wish, I would say Rav ??? son of Rachel know ??? complete. and he will see for him ??? other than this and it comes and does he act? reasoned Rav ??? the validity he ??? and comes of it to suffer lit, to the hands of ???

דף ג,ב משנה

priests ??? are exempt From a "kal vachomer", if ??? of Israel in the wilderness It would be a logical inference ??? of ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.