It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לג,א גמרא

and the academy of Hillel What case is he dealing with? perfect but: the master of ??? it is written (Deut. 15) ??? for just as tamei that is not he eats in the case of simple-holiness offerings. he eats ??? in the case of simple-holiness offerings. is it not logical ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? community And the academy of Hillel because ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: in cases regarding eating we say it. ??? is preferable and Rabbi Akiva permits And even if some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: a gentile What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi ??? (Deut. 15) ??? Just as a deer and a ram is permitted. some texts read: to the worshippers of the stars ??? Even ??? is permitted. some texts read: to the worshippers of the stars ??? And the other one three a deer and a ram are written one ??? Isaac ??? and one ??? And the other one Just as a deer and a ram are exempt from ??? Even invalid as regarding ??? are exempt from ??? The Rabbis taught first-born yes. ??? that specific ??? these are the words of the academy of Shammai And the academy of Hillel say ??? that specific ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא for the academy of Shammai As it is written (in Numbers 18) ??? it shall be to you Just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? No. Even Here in this case, ??? No. And the academy of Hillel What case is he dealing with? perfect but: the master of ??? and the academy of Shammai that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case ??? upon it ??? but: in a case ??? upon it ??? No. ??? the Merciful One between ??? upon it ??? to among that do not ??? upon it ??? For it was taught in a baraita the Paschal offering ??? came No. ??? from him ??? And the academy of Hillel there i.e., in another mishna he ??? the Merciful One (Num. 9) tamei ??? But here, in this case, tamei ??? it is written there is no difference The Rabbis taught yes. ??? on Yom Tov one like it; yes. ??? and not ??? This is satisfactory Yom Tov (holiday) that he came ??? that is not Look, for him except first-born Which Tanna taught: Rav Chisdah said the academy of Shammai She for he said: yes. ??? that specific ??? and not ??? Which Tanna taught: Rav Chisdah said Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon She For it was taught in a baraita they were before him two sin-offerings One ??? and one ??? ??? if before it was even the case that ??? of its blood of ??? it is permitted. if ??? of its blood of ??? forbidden ??? Shimon says even meat ??? of its blood of ??? forbidden and Rav Chisda ??? All of it like the academy of Shammai Perhaps Up to this point, No. ??? the academy of Shammai except ??? but: invalid as regarding ??? No.

דף לג,ב גמרא

??? All of it ??? Shimon perhaps, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Elazar ??? Shimon there i.e., in another mishna except invalid as regarding ??? but: first-born that is not mighty ones..." ??? No. and R' Elazar ??? Shimon he does not have all invalid as regarding ??? Perhaps, ??? That there are ??? Sarai to it Rav said ??? the son of of Rav ??? Just as ??? in the case of the flesh. in the west in the name of Ravina They said: because of ??? the blessing of the Service ??? Rabbi Yosei bar Avin says ??? lest ??? from them ???

דף לג,ב משנה

first-born ??? blood Even if did he die yes. ??? to him blood these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. but the sages say ??? but only that did not have may he do it? in it ??? and if One who acts in it ??? Behold! this No. ??? upon it Rabbi Shimon says: ??? despite the fact that he was makes in it ???

דף לג,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught first-born ??? blood ??? to him the blood in a place that do not ??? in it ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? to him the blood in a place ??? in it ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir but the sages say Even in a place which does in it ??? but only that did not have ??? on that specific ??? Rabbi Shimon says: Even ??? on that specific ??? R' Yehuda says: Even if did he die yes. ??? to him the blood he would say over for him R' Elazar ??? And there are those who say it was R' Chiyya ??? here, thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? of terumah For it was taught in a baraita ??? of terumah ??? of it doubt whether ??? Rabbi Eliezer says if it was in a place ??? in a place ??? if it was it is revealed ??? Rabbi Yehoshua says: if it was ??? in a place ??? in a place ??? if it was it is covered ??? Rabban Gamliel says: No. ??? of it a thing ??? like Rabbi Eliezer And the rabbbis like Rabbi Joshua And R' Yehudah like Rabban Gamliel From where can you derive Perhaps Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: ??? there i.e., in another mishna that he came does he act? ??? But here, in this case, ??? like Rabbi Joshua he reasons for himself. and Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Eliezer there i.e., in another mishna except lest ??? Elijah ??? But here, in this case, For if it was ??? for him ??? he reasons for himself. and Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis Here in this case, For if it was ??? for him ??? but: there i.e., in another mishna lest ??? Elijah ??? Eliezer they both reason this way and Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Yehudah Here in this case, that he came does he act? ??? but: there i.e., in another mishna ??? like Rabbi Joshua he reasons, ??? he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabban Gamliel there i.e., in another mishna that the name of a person ??? Elijah ??? But here, in this case, For if it was ??? for him ??? he reasons, And furthermore, Here in this case, ??? and here in this other case, ??? for he said: R' Chiyya bar Abba that R' Yochanan said Everyone acknowledges ??? after ??? that he was he is liable As it is written (Lev. 6) No. ??? chametz and not shall you do ??? after ??? that he was he is liable As it is written (Lev. 22) ??? if on ??? he is liable on ??? is it not all the more so? except ??? after ??? that he was he is liable No. ??? except ??? of Rabbi Meir reasoned all ??? No. it shall be in it And the rabbbis reason that (Lev. 22) ??? it shall be ??? and Rabbi Meir This ??? it shall be ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? the master of ??? the master of ??? This is obvious! ??? in reality he except ??? invalid as regarding ??? after ??? For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because ??? and the blessing of the Service ??? also ??? Come and learn from this. And the rabbbis also it is written all ??? No. it shall be in it ??? he ??? as it is taught: ??? No. it shall be in it yes. for me

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.