It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מג,א גמרא

??? in a place ??? that did not have in a place ??? There is this difference between them:

דף מג,א משנה

??? these between ??? between crossed over invalidate it ??? about them ??? ??? Rabbi Yehudah considers it proper and the sages invalidate it ??? is invalid, Who is ??? all that do not to him ??? of the gate ??? if there are to him behold! This is הרי זה is value

דף מג,א גמרא

why is it that ??? that is not it is written ??? And, too, ??? that is not are written ??? as it is taught: ??? It is not said in it ??? It is not said ??? from where do we learn to give is said of this to that and is said of this to that Scripture states: ??? the value of because of For if it was No. because of that it is possible ??? a person ??? No. he learns it which provides She herself ??? to join with the body of An altar of livestock ??? No. ??? which provides ??? because of let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? and it does not require ??? and I I thought to say for just as ??? that is not ??? you shall ??? is it not all the more so? ??? the Merciful One why do I have ??? the Merciful One all of them it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? In both places lit. here and here ??? the Merciful One If it was the writing of ??? then I might incorrectly say: all ??? is invalid, ??? and threads ??? also No. ??? and let the Merciful One write in the Torah all of them ??? then I might incorrectly say: all ??? is invalid, ??? also No. ??? the Merciful One all of them it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? to write ??? In both places lit. here and here ??? except ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael all parasha (scriptural section) ??? No. ??? except on account of a thing ??? of it Rabba said: why do I have ??? the Merciful One ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? which provides ??? a person ??? livestock No. will come which provides should it itself was sacrificed to join with the body of An altar of holy offerings ??? No. will come which provides ??? a person ??? No. will come which provides there are. ??? first-born ??? No. will come which provides ??? is greater than one ??? No. We come to compare ??? one ??? No. ??? the Merciful One ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? is greater than and We were accustomed ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? Just as ??? which provides there are. ??? to join with the body of An altar of ??? about them ??? From where in Tanach do we know this? that R' Yochanan said For scripture said: (Lev. 21) all a man who in it ??? a man ??? of ???

דף מג,ב גמרא

What is the difference between ??? the value of ??? of ??? that it is possible It is because of this: ??? the blessing of the Service ??? the blessing of the Service As it is written (Lev. 21) ??? in it and not ??? that is not the value of ??? of ??? No. ??? the blessing of the Service What is the difference between that is not the value of ??? of ??? but on account of the appearance in the eye that something looks like a transgression, even though it isn't There is this difference between them: ??? his head ??? his head ??? a Tanna taught: ??? in the midst of ??? his head ??? just like what people normally say, ??? a Tanna taught: ??? ??? R' Yehudah ??? that there is in it: ??? the whole world does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? of him. ??? one master reasons that this one he does not the value of ??? of ??? and one master reasons that ??? in reality ??? Rabba said: They did not teach this לא שנו except that do not to him after it and he has before him but: he has after it is valid and all the more so in which there is to him after it And he does not have before him and there are ??? and if there are to him behold! This is הרי זה is valid Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except in which there is to him after it And he does not have before him but: he has between after it between before him is invalid, and all the more so in which there is to him before him And he does not have after it ??? to him A general principle: ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? on account of those that are not the value of ??? of ??? It is necessary to teach this for him ??? and What would you have said? It is because of this: the appearance in the eye that something looks like a transgression, even though it isn't Hey, isn't it the case that all in a case That there are It is because of this: the appearance in the eye that something looks like a transgression, even though it isn't ??? The tanna teaches: ??? is invalid, because of the appearance in the eye that something looks like a transgression, even though it isn't What would you have said? One teaching ??? Hey, isn't it the case that all in a case That there are ??? he returns It was taught by ??? is invalid, It is because of this: the appearance in the eye that something looks like a transgression, even though it isn't except To exclude ??? as it is taught: as it is taught: ??? are proper And they did not say is invalid, except It is because of this: the appearance in the eye that something looks like a transgression, even though it isn't one This a Tanna taught: it is R' Yehudah as it is taught: R' Yehuda says: (Lev. 1) the priests. ???

דף מג,ב משנה

he (??? ) does not have or he (except) does not have ??? one ??? is said in the Torah Rabbi ??? says ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? says in which there is to him two ??? and two ???

דף מג,ב גמרא

??? to him ??? They challenged this from a baraita: ??? in which there is to him ??? in great quantity he (??? ) does not have or he (except) does not have ??? one from where do we learn Scripture states: or ??? Rabba said: ??? or ??? Rabbi ??? says ??? This comes to imply ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: ??? the son of in which there is to it two ??? and two ??? And Rav says ??? he does not ??? is forbidden in cases regarding eating Already ??? Rav ??? son of Chiyya for Rav, And he said to him: ??? except ???

דף מג,ב משנה

??? is invalid, Who is ??? two ??? as one two ??? is more and two ??? to the bottom ??? One is more ??? One to the bottom one who sees ??? and ??? sun ??? is invalid, because of the appearance in the eye that something looks like a transgression, even though it isn't

דף מג,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: or ??? R' Yosei says yes. ??? except ??? two ??? as one They said to him: ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.