It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מד,א גמרא

despite the fact that is not ??? two ??? two ??? Just as two ??? is more two ??? to the bottom Shall I say two ??? is more ??? is more two ??? to the bottom ??? to the bottom ??? One is more ??? One to the bottom ??? One to the bottom ??? One is more we were one who sees ??? and ??? as one except two ??? is more ??? is more two ??? to the bottom ??? to the bottom ??? One is more ??? One to the bottom ??? One is more ??? One to the bottom and they stand ??? also ??? ??? and ??? as one From where do we derive this? ??? (Lev. 21) ??? all Just as ??? from here two said ??? to the bottom two ??? is more ??? One is more ??? One to the bottom ??? ??? and ??? as one or ??? with his fellow and after says for me one who sees The rabbis taught: (Lev. 21) ??? between ??? between ??? in one ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: a man ??? Rabba said: why do I have ??? the Merciful One a man ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? It is because of this: ??? A general principle: but: ??? of him. it is not written: the Merciful One a man and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: a man It is because of this: that is not ??? Look, A general principle: but: ??? it is not written: the Merciful One ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? it is not written: the Merciful One ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? It is because of this: ??? but: It is because of this: ??? it is not written: the Merciful One ??? Rabba said: Therefore, all ??? We come to compare From the man ??? ??? Rav Yosef learned: ??? sun ??? Rav Huna one ??? and one ??? Rav Yehudah They challenged him from this teaching: ??? are lying down ??? one ??? and one ??? a Tanna taught: all ??? that is not ??? a seminal emission for him ??? ??? a Tanna taught: ??? the eye of ??? and Behold! regarding ??? them For it was taught in a mishna: ??? is invalid, because of the appearance in the eye that something looks like a transgression, even though it isn't There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one that is not ???

דף מד,א משנה

??? that are large ??? or ??? The greatness of the limbs or a child of the limbs ??? The greatness of the limbs or a child ??? Who is ??? all ??? all ??? the upper one ??? on the lower one the lower one ??? on the upper one Behold! this ??? is invalid, because of the appearance in the eye that something looks like a transgression, even though it isn't

דף מד,א גמרא

Rav said Moses our rabbi, ten cubits he was as it is said (Ex. 40) ??? ??? on ??? who ??? Moses our rabbi, ??? and then it is written (Ex. 26) ten cubits the length of ??? He said to him: Rav ??? son of Chiyya for Rav, If so, ??? to Moses our rabbi, the master of ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? The greatness of the limbs or a child of the limbs He said to him: ??? of ??? The greatness ??? a Tanna taught: ??? a Tanna taught: Even ??? Watch out for leading vav But they did not know rabbis What then does it mean when it says ??? "Hear ye to this some ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: one who seeks ??? Rav Chisdah said ??? that it does not have ??? and Rachel in which there is to it ??? are proper to join with the body of An altar of Another teaching is like this: there are items that are ??? and are not ??? upon them in the Holy Temple but not in the countryside and they are ??? that do not to him ??? and Rachel in which there is to him ??? Rav Chisdah said he said Ameimar they brought ??? with them is invalid And there is no meaning to the word ??? upon them they brought ??? with them ??? upon them They challenged him from this teaching: they brought ??? with them ??? about them There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? is invalid, They challenged this from a baraita: a cow ??? He explains -- ???

דף מד,ב משנה

??? a woman ??? he would exit ??? even One ??? wind of short she entered upon it ??? and the master of ???

דף מד,ב גמרא

he said Rabbi Abba the son of Rabbi Chiyya son of Abba urinate water before many And there is no meaning to the word they drink water before many Another teaching is like this: urinate water before many And there is no meaning to the word they drink water before many And it once happened on the first ??? water and not He urinated and it is found ??? Shmuel It is necessary to teach this for him on the Sabbath ??? for him ??? he came in front ??? He said to him ??? to you four hundred ??? where it is possible to you where it is not possible for him ??? Master, son of Rav Ashi It is necessary to teach this ??? a camel ??? And they said to him ??? He said to them ??? Is it not enough for me It is because of this: ??? The Rabbis taught two ??? there are in it ??? one sent forth ??? and one sent forth emitting seed and There is no difference between this to this except ??? at the hour ??? if ??? this ??? this Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found He uprooted he said Reish Lakish: What then does it mean that it is written (Deut. 7) No. it shall be about You He uprooted ??? when does the previous statement apply? No. it shall be about You He uprooted at a time i.e., in a case ??? Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: No. it shall be about You He uprooted from ??? that ??? should not be before the place when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case that you ??? Rav Pappa said: No. ??? a person water Not on implements of pottery and not on a place Difficult is for he said: Rav Behold! ??? to the eye ??? Abayye said: this one ??? No. ??? we do not have an objection to it. It was taught: Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? sends a person to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? sends a person to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? Rabbah said son of Rav Huna Rav said ??? Raysh Lakish said blood Rabbah ??? Rabbah emitting seed Rabbah ??? Rabbah excrement Rabbah ??? Rabbah who pilgrimage festivals ??? wind of ??? she entered upon it What then does it mean when it says ??? a Tanna taught: wind of son of ??? she entered ??? and the master of ??? a Tanna taught: ??? and the master of ??? a Tanna taught: ??? this ??? this the master of ??? and up to how much ??? Rav Yehudah until ??? It was taught: Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov says until ??? is invalid, is more from ??? is valid that it is possible that they said until ??? is valid to the bottom from ??? is invalid,

דף מד,ב משנה

he (??? ) does not have or he (except) does not have An egg One Behold! this (Lev. 21) ??? is said in the Torah Rabbi Yishmael says all ??? Rabbi Akiva says: all ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? says all ???

דף מד,ב גמרא

has a problem to Rabbi Yishmael this one lacking ??? should bring himself It was taught by ??? has a problem to Rabbi ??? This ??? should bring himself It was taught by ??? has a problem to Rabbi ??? son of ??? This wind of ??? should bring himself It was taught by ??? his reasoning is ??? and they add ??? we were ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? No. It was taught by ???

דף מד,ב משנה

There is an analogy between ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.