It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מה,א משנה

and the master of ??? Who is ??? Any thing that was ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? -- this refers to ??? he would exit ??? he would exit behind him ??? -- this refers to on -- this refers to or ??? is more until the section is valid to the bottom from the section ??? is valid it was of it ??? if there are of it ??? is invalid, And if not, is valid ??? twenty and four R' Yehudah considers it proper and the sages invalidate it ??? his hands Rabbi invalidates it and the sages validate it

דף מה,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Lev. 21) ??? a foot yes. for me except ??? a foot from where do we learn ??? Scripture states: or ??? a foot a Tanna taught: the master of ??? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said the master of ??? in which there is to him ??? in great quantity ??? that do not to him ??? all ??? he would exit ??? he would exit ??? R' Elazar said ??? he would exit in the midst of ??? Rav Pappa said: No. you say ??? and not ??? except immediately ??? even though ??? -- this refers to for the sake of -- this refers to or ??? The Rabbis taught (Lev. 21) ??? a hand yes. for me except ??? a hand ??? or ??? is more from the section ??? is valid except and not ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: or ??? it was in it ??? if there are of it ??? is invalid, And if not, ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said R' Yochanan said: This is only in the case ??? atop על גבי ??? The Rabbis taught ??? in which there is ??? there is not there ??? become tamei ??? and by being carried and become tamei ??? and ascend ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said that R' Yochanan said ??? for the sake of ??? Rav Chisdah said This item our rabbi, an adult male And they said the place it shall be as his helper ??? in which there is ??? there is not there ??? become tamei ??? and by being carried And there is no meaning to the word become tamei ??? he said ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? for the sake of ??? that R' Yochanan said they make their words in accordance with the words of ??? Just as your soul If it was ??? he ??? also ??? and if Is this not ??? he ??? and by being carried also No. ??? Rav Huna said son of ??? in the name of Rav Acha. the son of of Rav ??? It is because of this: ??? of it Rav Papa said, ??? that is not ??? because ??? If so, that is not ??? also ??? his male slave rabbis ??? so that thus it will be that is not ??? upon them terumah and holy offerings It was taught there: most of ??? and most of ??? of did he die despite the fact in which is not ??? The Rabbis taught Who is most of ??? two ??? one Because and most of ??? Who is most of ??? He said to him Ravina to Raba a Tanna taught: ??? he came ??? Come and learn from this. As it is taught: lacking in which is not except two hundred ??? in which there is in it two hundred ??? all of them we go up ??? according to ??? R' Yehudah said: Shmuel said It once happened ??? of R' Yishmael ??? One ??? burning of the king Examine and they found of it two hundred ??? and two He said to them: lest ??? to it the scripture two ??? and a second person ??? It was taught: Rabbi Eliezer says in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? as it is said (I Sam 4) ??? For ??? upon it ??? Rabbi Yehoshua says: in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? as it is said (Job 3) For No. ??? Rabbi Akiva says: in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? as it is said (Gen. 30) ??? ??? to Rabbi ??? it is a problem ??? Rabbi Yishmael Perhaps ??? Rav said and all of them yes. impart tumah ??? as it is said (Num. 19) this the Torah a person For ??? a thing ??? by any person. Abaye said to him: ??? there is not in this case. For it is written (Is. 21) ??? meat For it is written (Dan. 10) my Lord." ??? Here in this case, also, ??? meat Here, too, ??? For if it was No. you say thus two hundred and forty and eight in what way does It concerns itself No. ??? and not ???

דף מה,ב גמרא

??? he said R' Isaac and both of them, the written Torah one do they expound, (II Sam 21) and she became any more war and it is written (II Sam 21) And it was a man ??? his hands ??? his feet ??? one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that ??? Rabbah said What do I have to learn from As it is written ??? twenty and four ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? then I might incorrectly say: Six that are his and Six ??? the writing of twenty and four and if the writing of twenty and four then I might incorrectly say: he ??? side "satisfied" ??? side the writing of ??? atop על גבי ??? It was taught: R' Yehudah said: It once happened ??? one before came Rabbi ??? twenty and four He said to him: ??? He said to him: R' Yosi From here is there really proof? thus said to him ??? ??? The Rabbis taught ??? between in the hand of between ??? is invalid, ??? his hands Rabbi invalidates it and the sages validate it one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that ???

דף מה,ב משנה

??? ??? leprous plague ??? and are proper ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says a mute from ??? It is not from ??? Rabbi Eliezer says Even ??? and are proper ???

דף מה,ב גמרא

??? Really? Hey, isn't it the case that This certain individual for he said: them one he is required ??? except ??? just like what people normally say, ??? for he said: them one he is required ??? Watch out for leading vav For Rav learned: ??? that is high Really? ??? R' Abahu from where do we learn that the Holy One, who is Blessed, that ??? recites praises as it is said (Amos 2) and I myself ??? ??? who ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? he said Reish Lakish: that is high No. ??? lest he has fulfilled his obligation from them ??? No. ??? lest he has fulfilled his obligation from them ??? No. ??? the moon lest he has fulfilled his obligation from them ??? No. ??? lest he has fulfilled his obligation from them ??? the blessing of the Service ??? the blessing of the Service he is required ??? in the remainder of items ??? that is not like R' Yehudah as it is taught: he ate of figs ??? milk or honey enter ??? he is liable

דף מה,ב משנה

these are proper ??? that specific and his son ??? and he goes out the wall ??? of them transgression ??? ??? and One who married women ??? is invalid, until ??? benefit ??? is invalid, until that he will accept upon it that it should not be become tamei ???

דף מה,ב גמרא

and these kosher ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? and his son Shall I say "... Aharon and his sons ??? his son who ??? For it was taught: that specific and his son accustomed ??? and is not customary ??? except ??? he built ??? Here in this case, ??? he built ??? the daughter of the blessing of the Service She In reality lit: In the world "... Aharon and his sons ??? Here in this case, ??? his son In the west, they said in the name of R' Yosi son of Avin: ??? he said ??? She as it is taught: that specific and his son accustomed ??? and is not customary ??? says accustomed ??? and One who married women ??? a Tanna taught: ??? descends ??? Perhaps Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes to join with the body of wise Sarai for him his reasoning is It is necessary for him ??? ??? This is satistfactory ??? It is necessary for him ??? ??? except ??? it is not necessary ??? ??? What is there to say? ??? for him among the many This is satistfactory ??? among the many he (??? ) does not have except ??? he has ??? What is there to say? ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.