It's a start Dafcast Draft
ראש השנה
מועד קטן
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
עבודה זרה


Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits


This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.


This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."


I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סא,א גמרא

Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rabbi Shimon She for he said: bring in holy offerings ??? Hey, isn't it the case that for it teaches: it shall be left to die of natural causes it is R' Yehudah for he said: in error" tithe substitute offerings? ??? his reasoning is R' Yehudah ??? tithe ??? but his thought is R' Yehudah ??? tithe ??? For it was taught in a mishna: And they said It is because of this: ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And even he was substitute offerings? No. he was was sacrificed from this general principle it would follow of Rabbi Yehudah reasoned was sacrificed And if you say ??? for what ??? for him he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: For it was taught: There is no difference between one ten ??? except for this makes "Kedushah" ??? and this yes. makes "Kedushah" ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah ??? he that is not ??? does he act? this one ??? and he sacrificed And furthermore, as it is taught: (Lev. 3) if from the morning ??? one ten ??? It is possible that I ??? Even ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? And so that which was sanctified for Temple use before him make kiddush. or after it make kiddush. you shall says after it make kiddush. ??? with whom does it agree? Rabbi Yehudah And we have learned from the morning ??? one ten ??? except He explains -- R' Shimon ??? Abba in front of R' Yochanan ??? in these times (nowadays) is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) but on account of ??? If so, why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of two even one also No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? one the one who does not have ??? but: two immediately ??? until ??? in them? ??? Come and learn from this. it was said: One who says ??? "Go!" and ten by the Rav ??? in the name of Raba Scripture states: ??? and to one ten ??? he does not ??? and Rav Papa said, even he read ??? he does not ??? for he said: for him ??? and not ??? and what is the difference here, ??? For it was taught in a baraita One who says ??? "Go!" ??? separates terumah ??? the master of the house if he does not know ??? of the master of the house separates terumah ??? one ??? ten or ??? ten its terumah terumah They said: there i.e., in another mishna immediately That there are ??? proper and there are ??? evil he said ??? Here in this case, ??? She he said No. It was necessary to you ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.