It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כב,א גמרא

The rabbis taught: Assessment of ??? thirty day Assessment of ??? day these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabbi Yehudah says Assessment of ??? day Assessment of ??? day But the sages say: One of these and one of these ??? day Rav Chisdah said he said ??? The halacha is Assessment of ??? day ??? Rabbi Chiyya son of Avin: and he said about this teaching ??? He said to him: Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak to Rabbi Chiyya son of Avin: ??? or thirty ??? He said to him: ??? or ??? He said to him: ??? like Rabbi ??? or like Rabbi Yehudah He said to him: like Rabbi ??? and this one is Rabbi Meir thirty he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: He said to him: Thus said Rav Chisda ??? He ascended for it is the case that ??? came to proclaim ??? thirty with two ??? and even though and so when He accounts for them Master, ??? No. are they, except ??? immediately ??? the validity ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav Assi said: yes. ??? But rather, if so, it was usurious interest ??? of them and Rabbi Yochanan says or ??? in which there is in it usurious interest or ??? a woman It is because of this: food; Rav ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא did not say ??? a woman for it is the case that established for him rabbis It once happened his hand And the other one Oftentimes that is not ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: Assessment of ??? thirty day Assessment of ??? day ??? in the morning And in the evening, with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? obligation some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger who ??? except This is obvious! ??? obligation Israel If it was ??? who ??? for him So rather, that is not ??? And we have learned ??? This is satisfactory to Rabbi Yochanan ??? to it ??? a woman except for Rav, ??? it is a problem Rav would say to you ??? and to Rebbi Yochanan who it's settled. who ??? food; ??? that is not ??? If it was ??? If it was No. ??? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction ??? her ketubah written contract ??? Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav Yehudah Shmuel said for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said ??? her ketubah written contract ??? It does not have food If so, ??? No. ??? to it except immediately ??? to it from the beginning ??? to it in the end In any case, for Rav, ??? it is a problem In reality lit: In the world ??? obligation some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? upon it ??? Israel If so, usurious interest also No. ??? upon it ??? and not ??? upon it ??? Come and hear: yes. we accept repayment ??? except from ??? with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? obligation some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile who ??? except This is obvious! ??? obligation Israel If it was ??? who ??? for him except that is not ??? And we have learned ??? This is satisfactory to Rabbi Yochanan ??? to it ??? a woman except for Rav, ??? it is a problem Rav would say to you ??? and to Rebbi Yochanan who it's settled. If it was her ketuba why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? even of him that are his also ??? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction ??? She for he said: ??? a woman ??? In any case, for Rav, ??? it is a problem In reality lit: In the world ??? obligation some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? upon it ??? Israel ??? usurious interest also No. ??? and not ??? upon it ??? Come and hear: ??? to give ??? her ketubah written contract ??? obligation ??? This is satisfactory the master of obligation between Master, or whether Master, ??? except her ketubah written contract This is satisfactory to R' Yochanan it's settled. except for Rav, ??? it is a problem Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? give thanks Now that you have come to this understanding, you can apply the same understanding to this other problem: all of them also ??? give thanks ??? her ketubah written contract ??? He said to him Ravina ??? For didn't Rav Yehudah say Rav Assi said: yes. ??? except If so, it was usurious interest ??? of them Rabbi Yochanan says or ??? in which there is in it usurious interest or ??? a woman It is because of this: food; And even if Rabbi Yochanan he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: except ??? food; but: a divorcee did not say to him this one We of Rabbi Yochanan It is because of this: ??? we learn to it Rav Nachman said ??? It was not ??? immediately of what I heard from this teaching of Rav Huna? ??? in the name of Rav ??? that is not ??? according to ??? from here and onwards ??? from the beginning What is the reason? did not say Rav ??? the master of obligation a commandment ??? No. My son, ??? a commandment ??? Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua he said I will say ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? give thanks So, too, ??? did he die ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion Like Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua

דף כב,ב גמרא

We have learnt in a Mishna: Assessment of ??? thirty day Assessment of ??? day ??? in the morning And in the evening, with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? obligation some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger who ??? except This is obvious! ??? obligation Israel This is satisfactory to Rav Huna. the son of of Rav Joshua ??? to it ??? give thanks except for Rav, ??? it is a problem Rav would say to you ??? If you like, I could say her ketuba It is because of this: ??? And if you like, I could say ??? obligation some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? upon it ??? Israel If it was ??? upon it ??? them until ??? upon it ??? and not ??? upon it ??? Come and hear: in order to give ??? her ketubah written contract ??? obligation ??? with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars ??? who ??? except This is obvious! ??? obligation Israel This is satisfactory to Rav Huna. the son of of Rav Joshua ??? to it ??? give thanks except for Rav, ??? This is satisfactory her ketuba It is because of this: ??? except the master of obligation it is a problem In reality lit: In the world ??? obligation some texts read: a worshiper of stars ??? For example, ??? upon it ??? Israel If it was ??? upon it ??? them until ??? upon it ??? and not ??? upon it ??? Rava said: It is because of this: ??? He said to him Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua to Raba and who there is a fear of them. ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? that did not have in his face, No. ??? except ??? and he said R' Acha "the captain of ??? It once happened came before R' Isaac ??? and he said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? a woman It is because of this: ??? but: the master of obligation No. and Ravah said Rav ??? even the master of obligation also and if ??? there i.e., in another mishna also ??? He said to him there i.e., in another mishna since we say: The reason is that it should not be Each one take ??? of his fellow and brought who dwells to him ??? the sea Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion yes. ??? and if he said ??? this field and a maneh worth one hundred dinars -- this refers to ??? We do not board ??? field ??? and a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? They said: ??? in all of them ??? field that is not are his ??? No. ??? Rav Ashi said Therefore, ??? No. ??? For thus said Raba Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion yes. ??? and if ??? that they said ??? in all of them ??? field that is not are his ??? No. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.