It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כג,א משנה

??? it was upon it ??? a woman Rabbi Eliezer says ??? reside benefit Rabbi Yehoshua says: it is not necessary for him ??? In the matter ??? Even the evening ??? and it was the case that ??? benefit lest may he do it? ??? on items of movable property of this he returns his wife

דף כג,א גמרא

about what do they disagree? Rabbi Eliezer reasoned a person makes ??? on ??? and Rabbi Yehoshua reasoned yes. a person makes ??? on ??? and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For Rav Huna said: ??? all ??? and he said a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? faithfully ??? yes. makes ??? on that which was sanctified for Temple use Let us say, ??? he said ??? No. Up to this point, does not disagree except ??? but: ??? the words of all are yes. a person makes ??? on ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא yes. a person a sinner and not to him that it is possible that they said ??? does not disagree ??? a person makes ??? on that which was sanctified for Temple use and here in this other case, ??? among the many what they disagree about one master reasons that he has ??? he (??? ) does not have And if you wish, I would say ??? among the many he has ??? and here in this other case, ??? on the understanding of many what they disagree about and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for he said: Ameimar ??? among the many he has ??? on the understanding of many he (??? ) does not have Let us say, ??? he said ??? And, too, Rabbi Yehoshua says: it is not necessary for him he does not ??? should bring himself except Here in this case, ??? what they disagree about For it was taught: ??? it was upon it ??? a woman Rabbi Eliezer says ??? reside benefit Rabbi Yehoshua says: it is not necessary for him and R' Elazar said ??? Shimon there are. there are. these are the words of the academy of Shammai there are. there are. these are the words of The academy of Hillel ??? say that which was sanctified for Temple use in error" that which was sanctified for Temple use And the academy of Hillel say that which was sanctified for Temple use in error" he does not ??? and thus he was Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? Moses son of ??? it was. and Rav Huna the son of ??? from the rabbis it was. ??? for him the validity Abayye said: there is not in this case. ??? to Rav Huna. ??? her ketubah written contract ??? Raba said to him ??? reside benefit We have learnt in a Mishna: and Abaye because all ??? judgement ??? a saying ??? it was. Abayye said: according to a poor person ??? And who said it? Abaye thus For thus said Abaye: Who is a wicked person ??? this ??? to sell ??? the son of that I ??? from the rabbis that I Is it not enough for him ??? No. ???

דף כג,ב גמרא

??? it was. This is satistfactory for one for he said: ??? even though the one who does not have items of movable property to the borrower ??? except ??? it has ??? he does not have No. ??? What is there to say? If you wish, I would say Rav Huna it was. for him ??? And if you wish, I would say Abba ??? the son of ??? evening ??? the words of all are No. ??? obligation the words of all are ??? evening ??? obligation ??? that it is possible for one for he said: it has ??? to the borrower ??? he does not have No. ??? and there are for one for he said: even though the one who does not have ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion in all of them even though the one who does not have also ??? for there to be wheat est ??? is what he has No. ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא a commandment ??? and not something ??? There was this guy ??? Rav Yosef the son of of Raba in front of Rav ??? evening We have learnt in a Mishna: that which was sanctified for Temple use We have learnt in a Mishna: the purchaser What then? He said to him: a Tanna taught: For ??? They said: For it was taught in a baraita We have learnt in a Mishna: that is not We have learnt in a Mishna: No. We have learnt in a Mishna: Rav said ??? What is the reason? ??? This is satisfactory that which was sanctified for Temple use It is because of this: a resting place ??? evening also a commandment he ??? Is this not something ??? except the purchaser ??? know ??? one and one that it is possible upon it her ketuba why is it that ??? he ???

דף כג,ב משנה

??? it was upon it ??? a woman and the master of obligation yes. the his wife would find it possible ??? her ketubah written contract from ??? and not ??? ??? except ??? to give ??? obligation ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars and it was the case that ??? hundred a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? any more ??? ??? in order to give ??? her ketubah written contract ??? obligation ???

דף כג,ב גמרא

why do I have to say ??? It is because of this: For R' ??? for thus said Rabbi ??? that they will not say that which was sanctified for Temple use he would exit without redemption Our mishna that is not ??? Shimon son of ??? as it is taught: Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says if he was ??? opposite ??? And if not, he does not ??? And the rabbbis up to how much Rav Huna said son of Yehudah Rav Sheshet said until a fraction

דף כג,ב משנה

despite the fact where they said ??? that specific ??? to him food thirty day ??? two ten new a bed ??? to him but not ??? and to his children if he was artisan he gives to him two implements of ??? from all ??? A deaf person ??? to him two ??? and a second person ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: if he was ??? he gives to him ??? he gives to him ??? he was to him ??? one is greater than ??? one ??? yes. says to sell ??? from ??? except ??? to him two sectarians. from ??? and all in which there is to him from ??? elevate to him ???

דף כג,ב גמרא

What is the reason? For scripture said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.