It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כו,א גמרא

??? the house And there is no meaning to the word ??? my sanctity ??? the house ??? An altar of and Rabbi Shimon also let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? the house of ??? a thing ??? to the priests ??? to the priests And there is no meaning to the word ??? a thing ??? to the priests ??? that is not gifts ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: No. enters and not ??? Rabbah said What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 27) and if No. ??? the field No. ??? any more and if ??? the field and it was the case that the field ??? with the Jubilee Abayye said: ??? except Abayye said: The reason is of Rabbi Eliezer As it is taught: No. ??? It is possible she will not be ??? that it should be before him ??? Scripture states: any more ??? It is not ??? but: ??? that it should be before him ??? begins ??? Shall I say with the Jubilee ??? why is it that It is not ??? field ??? also ??? except This is obvious! with the Jubilee two and for one Shall I say to Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Shimon to the priests ??? except Is this not R' Eliezer And learn from this The reason is of Rabbi Eliezer from here ??? Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Shimon This any more What then does it mean when it says ??? of him. except Here in this case, with what are we dealing? in the field ??? to the priests ??? a priest and they came ??? I thought to say No. ??? that it should be before him ??? Scripture states: any more ??? It is not ??? but: ??? that it should be before him ??? For it was taught: (Lev. 27) ??? the field ??? It is possible he shall return ??? from him Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 27) ??? to him ??? the land it is said ??? to him ??? the land Just as Therefore, scripture states: ??? field that she went out to the priests and He sold it a priest ??? the purchaser ??? after It is possible ??? that are the first Scripture states: ??? and It is necessary to teach this No. ??? For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: No. ??? that is not ??? A general principle: But here, in this case, that he came ??? that came first Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? that is not ??? he is equivalent. But here, in this case, that he came ??? he is equivalent. ??? in their hands Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: No. ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: No. ??? and it is not written: any more then I might incorrectly say: No. ??? A general principle: Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: any more ??? It is not ??? but: ??? that it should be before him ??? What then do we do about it? Rabba said: Scripture states: and it was the case that the field ??? with the Jubilee ??? immediately after

דף כו,ב גמרא

They posed this difficulty: ??? with the Jubilee two ??? or No. Come and hear: (Lev. 27) No. ??? It is possible she will not be ??? that it should be before him ??? Scripture states: any more ??? It is not ??? but: ??? that it should be before him ??? begins ??? Shall I say with the Jubilee ??? why is it that It is not ??? also ??? except This is obvious! with the Jubilee two and for one If it was to Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Shimon to the priests ??? except Is this not to Rabbi Eliezer And learn from this ??? with the Jubilee two ??? Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Shimon This any more What then does it mean when it says ??? of him. except Here in this case, with what are we dealing? in the field ??? to the priests ??? a priest and they came ??? I thought to say No. ??? that it should be ??? Scripture states: any more ??? It is not ??? but: ??? that it should be before him ??? For it was taught: (Lev. 27) ??? the field ??? It is possible he shall return ??? from him Scripture states: (Lev. 27) ??? to him ??? the land Just as Therefore, scripture states: ??? field ??? to the priests and He sold it a priest ??? the purchaser ??? after It is possible ??? that are the first Scripture states: ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? No. ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: No. ??? that is not ??? A general principle: Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? that is not ??? he is equivalent. But here, in this case, ??? he is equivalent. ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: No. ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: No. ??? and it is not written: any more then I might incorrectly say: No. ??? A general principle: Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: any more ??? It is not ??? but: ??? that it should be before him ??? What then do we do about it? Come and hear: R' Eliezer says: ??? with the Jubilee two ??? to the priests with the Jubilee He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi ??? No. We have learnt in a Mishna: thus Rabbi Eliezer says: yes. the priests. enters to its midst until ??? after He said to him: ??? with the Jubilee two ??? that it is possible that they said R' Eliezer says: ??? with the Jubilee two It is not ??? to the priests with the Jubilee He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi Even We also ??? R' Eliezer says: yes. the priests. enters to its midst until ??? after He said to him If it was ??? with the Jubilee two ??? Come and learn from this.

דף כו,ב משנה

the one who purchased field ??? did he die his father and after this ??? Behold! She ??? and after this did he die his father Behold! She ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yehudah and R' Shimon say Behold! She ??? as it is said (Lev. 27) if ??? who No. ??? field that is not ??? to be field ??? Came forth -- this refers to that it ??? to be field ??? field ??? It is not ??? to the priests with the Jubilee that do not a person ??? a thing that is not are his the priests. ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? In reality lit: In the world between before ??? between after ???

דף כו,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: from where do we learn ??? field ??? and after this did he die his father from where do we learn that it should be before him ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 27) and if ??? who No. ??? field that is not ??? to be field ??? Came forth -- this refers to ??? to be field ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. and Rabbi Shimon Rabbi Meir says: from where do we learn ??? field ??? did he die his father and after this ??? from where do we learn that it should be before him ??? Scripture states: and if ??? who No. ??? field that is not field ??? was it taken out -- this refers to that it field ??? Let us say, In this case, ??? of Rabbi Meir reasoned ??? fruits ??? he is equivalent. R' Yehudah and Rabbi Shimon reason that ??? fruits Is this not ??? he is equivalent. Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said in reality ??? and Rabbi Yehudah ??? fruits ??? he is equivalent.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.