It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כח,א גמרא

How so? ??? and one ??? And if not, says to him ???

דף כח,א משנה

??? a person ??? who were Canaanites ??? and if ??? all of them ??? these are the words of ??? R' Elazar ben Azaryah said: Just as if ??? yes. a person permission ??? all ??? compared to the one case, how much more so the other! that it should be a person ??? on ???

דף כח,א גמרא

From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught (Lev. 27) from all who to him and not all who to him ??? and not every person ??? and not all livestock ??? and not all field ??? It is possible No. ??? and if ??? Scripture states: ??? these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer he said ??? son of ??? Just as if ??? yes. a person permission ??? all ??? compared to the one case, how much more so the other! that it should be a person ??? on ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: from all who to him then I might incorrectly say: all is what he has No. ??? but: ??? one ??? completely Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and not every person and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? that is not ??? for him without the blessing of the Service but: field ??? for him ??? and if we had heard Behold! both It is because of this: ??? and here in this other case, ??? but: ??? all of them It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. livestock why do I have to account for that which was taught It is possible ??? a person his son or his daughter his male slave or his female slave ??? Therefore, scripture states: livestock Just as livestock he has is a voluntary act ??? Even all in which there is to him is a voluntary act ??? Is it not the case that Watch out for leading vav or his daughter a small one he has is a voluntary act ??? It is possible ??? Therefore, scripture states: livestock Just as livestock he has is a voluntary act ??? In reality lit: In the world Even all in which there is to him is a voluntary act ??? Rabbi Eliezer said son of ??? if ??? yes. a person permission ??? we were Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna There is this difference between them: of Rabbi ??? for he said: Rabbi ??? they ordered ??? to ??? -- more ??? It once happened on the first which he sought ??? -- more ??? and not ??? to him ??? Rabbi ??? And there are those who say it was Rabbi ??? and not ??? to him ??? Rabbi Akiva

דף כח,א משנה

??? his son or his daughter his male slave or his female slave who were Jewish lit., Hebrew ??? yes. ??? that do not a person ??? a thing that is not are his the priests. ??? yes. ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi Shimon says: the priests. yes. ??? that are theirs ??? that do not ??? that are theirs he said Rabbi can be seen these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. ??? as it is said (Lev. 25) For ??? the world She to them these are the words of Rabbi Shimon ??? that do not ??? that are theirs

דף כח,א גמרא

And R' Yehudah This is satisfactory priests yes. ??? that are theirs except ??? This is satisfactory ??? No. ??? As it is written (Lev. 25) For ??? the world She to them except ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 27) from all who to him ??? There is an analogy between ??? and Rabbi Shimon This is satisfactory priests ??? except ??? This is satisfactory ??? that is not There is an analogy between except ??? why is it that it is written ??? the world She to them What then does it mean when it says ??? also for he says ??? Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, he said Rabbi can be seen these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. ??? these are the words of Rabbi Shimon ??? from this general principle it would follow of Rabbi Shimon ??? also he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: he said Rabbi can be seen these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. to Rabbi Shimon ??? Rabbi Shimon No. ??? except ??? but: ??? give thanks ??? said Rabbi Chiyya son of Avin: ??? for all a priest ??? as it is said (in Numbers 18) all ban" ???

דף כח,ב גמרא

to you it shall be ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) as it is said (Lev. 27) ??? the ban" ??? and there in that case From where do we derive this? as it is taught: (Num. 5) to Hashem ??? the Name and were given ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) You say ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) Or perhaps, except for all a priest ??? For as it says: (Num. 5) ??? a ram ??? who ??? in it upon it Behold! ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) is what the scripture says. field ??? to the priests with the Jubilee ??? for the rotating watch-group (mishmar) ??? in it ??? They posed this difficulty: he encounters on Shabbat What then does it mean when it says said Rabbi Chiyya son of Ami in the name ??? for the rotating watch-group (mishmar) which is coming out Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said It was taught: ??? You say one ??? and one ??? except ??? in the rear ??? It is because of this: thus ??? I would say because of ??? etc. This is satisfactory ??? in the rear As it is written (Deut. 15) ??? "satisfied" two shall you do ??? except ??? by day ??? it is written: (Lev. 25) by day ??? shofar in all ??? So, with whom does it agree? R' Yishmael his son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah She for he said: ??? he ??? son of ??? and He went he said in front For R' ??? Is this not ??? She That there are ??? and there are that is not There is an analogy between ??? No. ???

דף כח,ב משנה

??? priests they do not have redemption except they give to the priests ??? R' Yehudah en Beteira says ??? euphemisms for bans ??? the house as it is said (Lev. 27) all ban" and that which was sanctified for Temple use holy offerings he to Hashem but the sages say ??? euphemisms for bans to the priests as it is said (Lev. 27) ??? the ban" ??? If so, why is it said all ban" and that which was sanctified for Temple use holy offerings he to Hashem that falls on The holiest of holy offerings and on simple offerings ??? a person ??? between The holiest of holy offerings between simple offerings if ??? he gives ??? and if ??? he gives ??? ox this an elevation-offering ??? how much a person ??? to give ??? this ??? an elevation-offering even though that is not permission the first-born between perfect between the master of ??? that specific How so? ??? that specific ??? how much a person ??? to give ??? this ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter or ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.