It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כט,א גמרא

The rabbis taught: ??? priests Watch out for leading vav And they do not have redemption ??? euphemisms for bans The whole time that are in the house of ??? Behold! there are. ??? for all ??? as it is said (Lev. 27) all ban" ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use holy offerings he to Hashem ??? Behold! there are. for all ??? as it is said (in Numbers 18) all ban" ??? to you ??? R' Yehudah en Beteira says ??? euphemisms for bans ??? the house ??? This is satisfactory rabbis ??? their reason and the reason of Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira except Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira This ??? the ban" What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him ??? for him to account for that which was taught (Lev. 27) ??? the ban" ??? Just as Therefore, scripture states: from where do we learn ??? field ??? that did not have it is said Because ??? to the priests Consider this case: She under the hands of shall be mine It would be a logical inference ??? others I he merits ??? is it not all the more so? Scripture states: ??? the ban" ??? And so Just as we have learned ??? ban" From here, Behold! this came to teach and it is found teach There is an analogy between field ??? of Israel Just as field ??? of Israel ??? to the priests Even field ??? his brothers? the priests. And the other one ??? the ban" And the other one ban" the ban" No. ??? for him And Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira ??? on The holiest of holy offerings and on simple offerings ??? for him reasoned for him like Rabbi ??? Rav said "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira Rav ??? rabbis and does he act? like Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira ??? It was taught: ??? and does he act? ??? Rav ??? also ??? It was taught by What then does it mean when it says ??? Our mishna ??? Rav ??? If so, like Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira ??? should bring himself thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for what ??? "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira There was this guy ??? he came in front of Rav Yehudah He said to him: ??? four ??? upon them ??? to you Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? euphemisms for bans ??? the house like who ??? for he said: that which was sanctified for Temple use the value of a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? on the value of ??? I will say for Shmuel said: ??? initially Watch out for leading vav And who said it? What case is he dealing with? at a time i.e., in a case ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived That there are ??? but: in these times (nowadays) Even if initially If so, Even if ??? also the proclamation of a saying Ulla said If it was ??? there i.e., in another mishna it was. ??? all of them to the priests Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? euphemisms for bans to the priests They challenged him from this teaching: yes. a Hebrew male slave accustomed except at a time i.e., in a case ??? accustomed as it is said (Lev. 25) until ??? Your nation And there is no meaning to the word field the ban" ??? except at a time i.e., in a case ??? accustomed as it is said (Lev. 25) and went out with the Jubilee ??? yes. houses the cities of wall We were accustomed except at a time i.e., in a case ??? accustomed as it is said (Lev. 25) He has not fulfilled his obligation. with the Jubilee Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai says yes. field ??? We were accustomed except at a time i.e., in a case ??? accustomed as it is said (Lev. 27) and it was the case that the field ??? with the Jubilee ??? to Hashem ??? the ban" Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says yes. ??? accustomed except at a time i.e., in a case ??? accustomed Rav said ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא We come to compare good good It is written here (Deut. 15) For good to him Your nation And it is written there (Deut. 23) in the goodness of to him No. ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that It once happened ??? also it was. ??? Israel he is equivalent.

דף כט,א משנה

Rabbi Yishmael says It is written one says ??? and It is written one says No. ??? to say ??? for behold! Already it is said No. ??? to say No. ??? for behold! Already it is said ??? How so? ??? you that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? and if you ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use An altar of

דף כט,א גמרא

And the rabbbis (Lev. 27) to ??? should bring himself ??? should bring himself to account for that which was taught from where do we learn ??? first-born ??? as it is said (Deut. 15) ??? and Rabbi Yishmael If it was No. ??? for him No. ??? it was. And because of the fact and so when No. ??? for him ??? It is not necessary ???

דף כט,ב משנה

??? ??? in the hour of ??? he does not is permitted. ??? less than ??? two as it is said (Lev. 25) ??? two ??? he shall sell to you it was ??? or ??? he does not an elevation-offering from ??? or ??? an elevation-offering to him from ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: He sold it to him before the New Year but it ??? fruits Behold! this he eats from it three ??? two

דף כט,ב גמרא

??? in the hour of ??? and etc. he does not ??? No. The tanna teaches: except he does not is permitted. ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? also that it is possible that even ??? he also forbids it. and not ??? sell and it was standing ??? As it is written (Lev. 25) ??? two ??? he shall sell to you except even the purchaser also he arises ??? (Lev. 25) two the possibility of repair if done improperly there is not in this case. it was said: ??? herself Rav said: ??? And Shmuel said It is not ??? all the essence What is the reason? of Shmuel ??? for just as ??? Already ??? that is not ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? and for Rav, we do not say ??? For ??? For it was taught: It is possible ??? a person Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? for just as ??? Already ??? now that is not ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? Here in this case, ??? They challenged him from this teaching: after ??? two the possibility of repair if done improperly This teaches ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? from ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 25) on account of most of ??? and in accordance with ??? herself No. ??? and if ??? It is not ??? Rav would say to you It is not ??? two ??? but: ??? She ??? and if ??? until according to ??? according to ??? two ??? who was not taught? ??? year" One before ??? to him year" ??? after ??? there i.e., in another mishna Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down as regard to eating, Here in this case, No. Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down as regard to eating, Rav said ??? of him ??? Shmuel both one ??? And the other one ??? his male slave some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? or "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel he has fulfilled his obligation ??? one ??? and one No. ??? and not ??? Which of him Rav Yosef said ??? We ??? his male slave in areas outside the Land of Israel he has fulfilled his obligation ??? and it is necessary writ ??? two Learn from this ??? for him for two his rabbi; Perhaps, No. ??? And so he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Shmuel Here in this case, It is not ??? and coins ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.