It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לב,א גמרא

??? for him ??? the master of ??? this one in reality ??? the master of ??? did not occur ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? (and there are those who say Rav Ashi and perhaps, For ??? for him ??? that did not have in his face, but: in his face, between ??? between the master of ??? gifts that it is possible that they said Rabba said: ??? of Hallel Behold! this ??? in order ??? for me two hundred zuz it was given to him between ??? between the master of ??? And so It is necessary to teach this for him ??? that did not have in his face, but: in his face, between ??? between the master of ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? (and there are those who say Rav ??? son of ??? and perhaps, between in his face, between that did not have in his face, ??? yes. the master of ??? No. and Hallel What then does it mean when it says ??? for him ???

דף לב,א משנה

Any thing that was within the walls Behold! he ??? the cities of wall except for ??? R' Meir says Even ??? the house of ??? R' Yehuda says: he does not ??? the cities of wall Rabbi Shimon says: wall ??? She ???

דף לב,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught the house of yes. for me except the house of from where do we learn ??? houses posts and houses ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 25) who in the city It is possible that I ??? Even ??? Scripture states: the house of these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi Meir says: the house of yes. for me except the house of from where do we learn ??? houses posts and houses ??? and even fields Scripture states: who in the city and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching it is written the house of Rav Chisdah said Rav said ??? There is this difference between them: For it was taught: ??? Rabbi Meir says: ??? R' Yehuda says: ??? the house of ??? R' Yehuda says: he does not ??? the cities of wall ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: and both of them, the written Torah one do they expound, (Josh. 2) ??? For ??? the walls ??? She ??? reasoned ??? And R' Yehudah reasoned ??? She ??? and not in the city wall

דף לב,א משנה

a city ??? and one such that there is not ??? wall since the days of Joshua bin Nun It is not ??? the cities of wall and they are houses the cities of wall three ??? of two houses ??? wall since the days of Joshua bin Nun For example, short ??? of ??? of ??? milk ??? and a camel ??? and Jerusalem and thus is subject to the same laws as them ???

דף לב,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught wall and not ox ??? round and round creates an exclusion ??? Rabbi Eliezer son of ??? says (Lev. 25) who ??? wall despite the fact that do not to him now and it was the case that to him before ??? and they are houses the cities of wall ??? a Tanna taught: a camel ??? the Jordan ??? and Jerusalem in Yehudah What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is:

דף לב,ב גמרא

Abayye said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: until a camel ??? until ??? the Jordan ??? and Jerusalem in Yehudah Rava said: a camel ??? To exclude a camel ??? lands ??? the Jordan To exclude ??? lands ??? that is not that it is possible ??? No. It is necessary to teach this for him and Jerusalem who ??? of it For it was taught: ten items ??? in Jerusalem yes. the house ??? of it Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? wall since the days of Joshua bin Nun and not ??? For this Jerusalem yes. the house ??? of it And even Here in this case, the house ??? of them Rav Ashi said: Is this not Rav Yosef said two and that which was sanctified for Temple use are they, So, here, two Jerusalem are they, It was taught: R' Yishmael ??? For what reason ??? the sages those ??? My son, ??? they found these ??? but: ??? the sanctity of the land his reasoning is "Kedushah" the first ??? and not ??? in the future in going We challenge that from the following baraita Thus said Rabbi Yishmael ??? And so these only. they were Does it not clearly ??? say (Deut. 3) ??? a city all ??? all ??? except For what reason ??? the sages those ??? My son, ??? they found these ??? this one say that is not It is necessary for him ??? except ??? and not these only. except all ??? to you ??? into your hand ??? wall since the days of Joshua bin Nun all the commandments ??? of it because of ??? the first ??? in the future in going If you wish, I would say it is a case of two different Tanaaim and who follow the reasoning ??? For R' Yishmael And if you wish, I would say one ??? R' Elazar son of ??? he said as it is taught: ??? son of ??? says who ??? wall despite the fact that do not to him now and it was the case that to him before ??? What is the reason? ??? "Kedushah" the first ??? and not ??? in the future in going As it is written (Nech. 8) ??? My son, ??? from ??? For No. they make ??? Joshua bin Nun thus the Children of Israel etc. and she became happiness that is large greatly ??? came David and not they make ??? until Ezra came except There is an analogy between ??? in the days of Ezra ??? in the days of Joshua Just as ??? in the days of Joshua ??? and His holiness the cities of wall Even ??? in the days of Ezra ??? and His holiness the cities of wall And it is said: (Deut. 30) ??? Hashem your God to the land who ??? There is an analogy between ??? Just as ??? all items ??? Even ??? all items ??? And the other one who seeks prayers for mercies on ??? his merits. upon them For a sukkah And this is like the position that he came ??? he read ??? cases it is written Joshua and here in this other case, it is written (Nech. 8) ??? This is satisfactory Moses No. prayers for mercies asked There was not his merits. ??? Israel except Joshua that he has i.e., that he is expected his merits. ??? Israel why is it that No. that prayers for mercies should request Hey, isn't it the case that it is written who ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: immediately ??? and who ??? now ??? Reuben? ??? Ezra As it is written of him. (Ezra 2) all ??? four ??? thousands ??? hundred ??? it was. with whom does it agree? as it is taught: ??? Reuben? ??? as it is said (Lev. 25) ??? in the land." for all ??? at a time i.e., in a case for all of ??? upon it and not at a time i.e., in a case who are exiled ??? It is possible they were upon it there are. ??? Benjamin in Yehudah ??? Yehudah ??? accustomed Therefore, scripture states: for all ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? and not at a time i.e., in a case that are ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? son of Isaac ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.