It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ה,א גמרא

??? of -- this refers to an elevation-offering It is possible shall be All of it an elevation-offering Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 27) all who He shall give" from him to Hashem it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use from him ??? and not All of it ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: it shall be ??? shall be How so? it shall be sold. ??? Those who are ill except ??? that specific ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Yosei, and R' Shimon say from where do we learn ??? of -- this refers to an elevation-offering ??? an elevation-offering Therefore, scripture states: all who He shall give" from him to Hashem it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? All of it and even ??? yes. All of it an elevation-offering What case is he dealing with? ??? a thing that do not ??? that is hanging in it but: a thing ??? that is hanging in it ??? All of it ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Master, he for he said: ??? male, ??? the sanctity of ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? All of it this one ??? one ??? one ??? also ??? to us who seeks Rabbah ??? What then? For It was necessary to us ??? Here in this case, ??? is equivalent ??? the master of ??? also ??? to us who seeks Rabbah he is equivalent. ??? to join with the body of An altar of What then? For ??? to us ??? about this teaching ??? now ??? this one ??? No. ??? to us Back to the main body of the text: he is required Rabbah he is equivalent. ??? to join with the body of An altar of What then? it is judged ??? Or perhaps, it is judged ??? No. ??? with its monetary value? ??? it is judged ??? or, perhaps, No. ??? to join with the body of An altar of ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. he is required Raba ??? by the to join with the body of An altar of What then? it is judged ??? a hand or yes. it is judged ??? a hand No. ??? it is judged ??? a hand or, perhaps, No. ??? to join with the body of An altar of ??? except ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. he is required Rav Ashi ??? field ??? to join with the body of An altar of What then? who say No. ??? field ??? except the house of seed ??? silver or, perhaps, No. ??? to join with the body of An altar of ??? except ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered.

דף ה,א משנה

less than ??? new vowed as a neder-offering but not ???

דף ה,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? less than ??? new Rabbi Meir says: he gives ??? But the sages say: did not say anything about what do they disagree? ??? reasoned yes. a person sent forth his words ??? know that do not ??? new ??? and he said for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? And the rabbbis reason that a person sent forth his words ??? like who ??? this one For Rav Gidal said that Thus said Rabbi One who says ??? implements of by the he gives ??? like Rabbi Meir This is obvious! ??? We come to compare What would you have said? even ??? there i.e., in another mishna he ??? reasoned so that thus it will be That there are ??? that it is possible also ??? But here, in this case, ??? certainly a person know that do not ??? and he said for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? Come and hear from this.

דף ה,ב גמרא

and to Rabbi Meir for what It is necessary to teach this What would you have said? The reason is of Rabbi ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? less than ??? because son of ??? But here, in this case, ??? I would say No. Come and learn from this. The reason is of Rabbi ??? a person sent forth his words ??? there is no difference Here in this case, and They did not teach this לא שנו Here in this case, like who ??? this one for he said: Rabbah son of Joseph Rav said And there are those who say it was Rav said ??? son of ??? Rav said ??? his fellow he gives ??? like who like Rabbi ??? this one he said Rav one ??? For Rav Gidal said that Rav said One who says ??? implements of by the he gives ??? What would you have said? there i.e., in another mishna he ??? that do not ??? and he said for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? but: livestock ??? She that it is possible to say ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: If it was I thought to say to it ??? to it ??? to it ??? but: he is equivalent. he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Come and learn from this. Rav Ashi said This is only in the case for he said: by the but: he said Behold! This is No.

דף ה,ב משנה

some texts read: a worshiper of stars ??? Rabbi Meir says: ??? but not ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? but not ??? and both this and this "We thank..." ???

דף ה,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught the Children of Israel ??? And there is no meaning to the word some texts read: the worshipers of stars ??? It is possible No. ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 27) a man These are the words of R' Meir he said Rabbi Meir And so based on this lit: from after, ??? one ??? and the written Torah one ??? On account of what I says ??? and not ??? because of ??? the scripture ??? -- more ??? for behold! A deaf person a mute and a child ??? but not ??? Rabbi Yehudah says the Children of Israel ??? And there is no meaning to the word some texts read: the worshipers of stars ??? It is possible No. ??? Therefore, scripture states: a man Rabbi Yehuda said And so based on this lit: from after, ??? one ??? and the written Torah one ??? On account of what I says some texts read: a worshiper of stars ??? and not ??? because of ??? the scripture ??? -- more ??? for behold! ??? but not ??? Rabba said: ??? of Rabbi ??? his reason No. ??? The reason is of Rabbi Yehudah ??? No. ??? of Rabbi ??? As it is written (Ezra 4) No. to you to us ??? the house of our God his reason No. ??? that he came ??? for him for a deaf-mute and a child that I A deaf person a mute and a child ??? My son, ??? The reason is of Rabbi Yehudah ??? that he came ??? for him ??? that even for the sake of ??? the Merciful One ??? No. ??? As it is written No. to you to us ??? the house of our God And Rabbi Yehudah This No. to you to us What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him Rav Chisdah said he said ??? Except I can object with text from here: No. ??? in it For it was taught in a baraita ??? Sin-offerings that are designated to die of natural causes and money that is designated to be thrown into the Sea of Salt i.e., the Dead Sea, to corrode into oblivion --- benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. Why is it that It was taught: regarding my sanctity some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? An altar of but: ??? the house We apply the laws of misappropriation to them except Rabba said: It is because of this: ??? it is written: (Ezra 4) And it was with the land ??? the hands of with Yehudah ??? to build

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.