It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ו,א גמרא

a Tanna taught: one some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? the house ??? from him And another teaching yes. ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? that R' Yochanan said There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one in the rear of for he said: ssi Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? even water and salt yes. ??? from them in the rear of a thing ??? yes. ??? a thing that is not ??? How so? a thing ??? Rav Yosef said For example, cubits ??? Rav Yosef challenged this by citing (Nech. 2) ??? to ??? who of the king etc. Abaye said to him: that I ??? that is not ??? of him. for Shmuel said: If it was he said ??? He uprooted ??? and not he returns ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? terumah ??? they examine that specific If it was in knowledge" Israel ??? And if not, require ??? there is a fear of them. lest in his heart to heaven. They challenged him from this teaching: some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? in that place It is written upon it they examine that specific if he said in knowledge" Israel ??? and He shall make use ??? And if not, require ??? there is a fear of them. lest in his heart to heaven. The reason is ??? It is written upon it ??? this one there is not there It is written upon it No. ??? it is the law ??? in that place It is written upon it also ??? But hey, come and learn from this. ??? It is written upon it ??? and He shall make use ??? that did not have in his place Is this not ??? For it was taught in a baraita he was It is written on ??? the vessels and on the footprints the mattress Behold! this ??? Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of ??? One who says a sela coin -- this refers to ??? is permitted. ??? They deduced from this for himself yes. after No. it was said: Rav said Ami Rabbi Yochanan said: between for himself between after he said Rabbi ??? They did not teach such a ruling except for he said: by the but: he said Behold! This is ??? he is required ??? He disagreed with this Raba ??? he said -- this refers to he makes use of it so that thus it will be ??? but: he said by the No. except No. ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Raba ??? justice And there is no meaning to the word that which was sanctified for Temple use justice What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? and not that which was sanctified for Temple use justice except Is this not thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: justice Behold! She (Deut. 23) ??? It is not ??? For this that which was sanctified for Temple use is forbidden ??? of him. And even justice Sarai ??? of him. Rav said ??? in front of Rav ??? he said You thus you learn to it We thus we learn to it Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said One who says a sela coin -- this refers to ??? is permitted. ??? between for himself between after between he said by the between he said Behold! ??? The Rabbis taught a sela coin -- this refers to ??? before it was even the case that ??? is permitted. ??? is forbidden ???

דף ו,ב גמרא

Really? Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi ??? that I Rabbi ??? them ??? the doings of ??? them The Rabbis taught Israel ??? or lamp to the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue is forbidden ??? reasoned Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba to say there is no difference for a matter of freedom and there is no difference for a matter of a commandment He said to him: Rav Ami Thus said Rabbi Yochanan They did not teach such a ruling except for a matter of freedom but: for a matter of a commandment is permitted. ??? ssi R' Yochanan said: some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? or lamp to the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue before it was even the case that ??? in that place ??? is forbidden ??? in that place ??? is permitted. ??? for what Shall I say for a matter of freedom why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile even Israel also except for a matter of a commandment and the reason ??? he ??? but: Israel that is not ??? it is of acceptable worth. ??? a lamp to the synagogue lit, house of assembly of Rav Yehudah ??? Raba that it is possible that they said ??? Raba ??? and there are those who say איכא דאמרי ??? Rabbah one ??? reasoned that is not ??? and one ??? reasoned There were times when ??? and comes

דף ו,ב משנה

??? but that which is coming out ??? Not vowed as a neder-offering and not ??? R' Chaninah son of ??? says ??? because of ??? Rabbi Yosei says: ??? and if ??? he is liable

דף ו,ב גמרא

This is satisfactory ??? Not vowed as a neder-offering ??? son of ??? he and not ??? son of ??? he except he would exit ??? This is satisfactory Not vowed as a neder-offering ??? son of ??? he except No. ??? why is it that No. as it is taught: from where do we learn that is coming out ??? and he said ??? by the who did not say anything Scripture states: (Lev. 27) all ban" No. ??? It is possible even before ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 27) from a person and not all a person and to Rebbi ??? son of ??? for he said: ??? because of ??? This all ban" What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him to account for that which was taught Rabbi Yishmael his son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah says on account of ??? heaven that it is given money or property ??? to them as it is said (Ex. 21) if ??? upon it It is possible Even by human hands thus Therefore, scripture states: all ban" No. ??? yes. for me except ??? that did not have ??? that we learn ??? from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: all ??? Rabbi Yosei says: ??? and it was taught that came first who he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: that is not except ??? does not disagree Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? a Tanna taught: that came first reasoned if ??? he is not liable ??? and Rabbi Yosei, reasoned if ??? he is liable ??? about what do they disagree? Rav Yosef said ??? on "Here is ??? from ??? what they disagree about a Tanna taught: that came first reasoned ??? on "Here is he does not ??? from ??? and Rabbi Yosei, reasoned ??? on "Here is ??? from ??? Rava said: ??? on "Here is he does not ??? from ??? and here in this other case, ??? her ketuba in the Torah what they disagree about a Tanna taught: that came first reasoned ??? her ketuba in the Torah Is this not ??? with a contract is comparable and Rabbi Yosei, reasoned ??? with a contract is comparable and there is someone who teaches this as referring to this other teaching that is coming out ??? he ??? with others he is liable others ??? in it are exempt Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says Even he if ??? with others is exempt that did not have ??? a court

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.