It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף י,א גמרא

or perhaps, all it "Kedushah" he does not ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth and if ??? to say justice. ??? one immediately ??? "Kedushah" ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth except ??? this ??? What then? For ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? "Kedushah" but: ??? No. or perhaps, immediately ??? he ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. he is required pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth or atones ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth Rabba said: Scripture states: (Lev. 27) and if ??? his house ??? and not ??? he is required pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? they shall make a substitution. or ??? they shall make a substitution. Rabba said: If so, ??? doing substitute offerings? For example, ??? And furthermore, for he said: Rav ??? Rav Huna said a Tanna taught: (Num. 6) its sacrifice to Hashem on ??? who ??? And so a Nazir it is judged ??? a hand How so? its sacrifice to Hashem on ??? of his. ??? who ??? to him others for what ??? Shall I say in the matter of atonement This is obvious! ??? for him except in the matter of substitute offerings? and thus he comes to say Even ??? to him others they shall make a substitution. Learn from this according to ??? do we go? No. in the matter of substitute offerings? and that he came it is a problem to you gifts that he came ??? for him If it was Is this not of Rabbi the Merciful One (Num. 6) ??? who ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? the scripture he its sacrifice ??? he ??? No. Come and learn from this. What then do we do about it? Come and hear: for he said: R' Abahu Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? they shall make a substitution. separates terumah of his. on of others ??? benefit are his What is the reason מאי טעמא Scripture states: (Deut. 26) all tithe ??? etc.

דף י,א משנה

yes. ??? No. ??? and not ??? and not ??? and Abraham ??? and not ??? of them Rabbi Yosei says: ??? Abraham ??? but not ??? of them R' Yosi said Is it not the case that ??? One who says ??? of -- this refers to an elevation-offering All of it an elevation-offering Even ??? of -- this refers to under -- this refers to shall be All of it substitute offerings? underneath it

דף י,א גמרא

was it said; son of ??? he said yes. "Kedushah" ??? on ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: "Kedushah" ??? on ??? And he is consistent Rabbi Yochanan with his reasoning for he said: Rabbi Yochanan ??? A sin-offering preganant and she gave birth to running of it ??? running ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard ??? the first there i.e., in another mishna he ???

דף י,ב גמרא

??? But here, in this case, ??? this one are in the general category ??? No. ??? and if we had heard the final one -- there i.e., in another mishna he ??? to it and all for there is of it But here, in this case, ??? for him immediately ??? No. made kiddush, Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements ??? other than this And what can we come and learn from this? if ??? and transgresses Is this not ??? of its mother he and two why do I have Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was was it said; In this case, It is because of this: ??? "Kedushah" to it ??? also ??? but: Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one No. Come and learn from this. ??? and If it was said, In this case, It is because of this: that he came ??? "Kedushah" on ??? but: this particular it is not necessary to teach this ??? R' Zeira and he said about this teaching ??? R' ??? to Rabbi Zeira How so? ??? on the first-born ??? preganant says Just as ??? of -- this refers to an elevation-offering she gave birth to male, Behold! This is an elevation-offering Perhaps, ??? transgresses He said to him: For ??? this particular ??? who ??? the sanctity of ??? that he came ??? for him from ??? He said to him: yes. For it was taught in a mishna: all holy offerings ??? and redeemed they are obligated ??? The reason is ??? who have been redeemed ??? but: before who have been redeemed are exempt ??? the sanctity of ??? for him ??? One who says Just as ??? of -- this refers to an elevation-offering it is permitted. ??? forbidden ??? It is because of this: ??? transgresses ??? He said to him: Here, too, the sanctity of ??? and who ??? the sanctity of ??? for him ??? He said to him: yes. For it was taught in a mishna: ??? The reason is It is because of this: ??? this one before who have been redeemed are forbidden ??? Perhaps, the sanctity of ??? are forbidden for him ??? yes. ??? No. ??? and not ??? The offal of he that is not ??? this one ??? my sanctity He said to him: ??? holy offerings he ??? and they stand If it was ??? holy offerings ??? "Amen" he that is not ??? this one ??? and this was taught! yes. ??? they shall make a substitution. So, with whom does it agree? it is Rabbi Yehudah for he said: ??? they shall make a substitution. If it was R' Yehudah substitute offerings? he that is not my slave this one make kiddush. my sanctity ??? Yehudah ??? No. my sanctity said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? that is hanging in it ??? but not ??? Here in this case, also, ??? holy offerings If it was ??? holy offerings What then does it mean when it says ??? this one ??? and they stand

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.