It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יד,א משנה

there are ??? an individual that do not ??? and there are ??? that do not ??? Watch out for leading vav or the individual ??? Watch out for leading vav or the individual doing substitute offerings? And there is no meaning to the word ??? doing substitute offerings? ??? Watch out for leading vav or the individual ??? between ??? between ??? yes. We were accustomed except ??? Watch out for leading vav or the individual they are obligated to replace them ??? yes. they are obligated to replace them and not ??? but: they are obligated ??? there are ??? Just as that do not ??? an individual ??? the Sabbath and ??? an individual are not ??? not the Sabbath and not ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Is it not the case that ??? and A bull of Yom Kippur. ??? Watch out for leading vav or the individual there are. ??? the Sabbath and ??? except ???

דף יד,א גמרא

sacrifice an individual they shall make a substitution. ??? he Consider this case: ??? an individual And there is no meaning to the word they shall make a substitution. And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? The tanna teaches: Consider this case: ??? an individual he And there is no meaning to the word they shall make a substitution. So, with whom does it agree? it is Rabbi Yehudah for he said: ??? they shall make a substitution. Consider this case: substitute offerings? herself ??? an individual She And there is no meaning to the word substitute offerings? they shall make a substitution. And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? The tanna teaches: Now that you have come to this understanding, you can apply the same understanding to this other problem: even you say rabbis ??? Watch out for leading vav or the individual ??? between ??? between ??? he Consider this case: an elevation-offering ??? an individual male, We come to compare female No. We come to compare ??? An elevation-offering of a bird: as it is taught: they shall be allowed to die of natural causes ??? And there is no meaning to the word they shall be allowed to die of natural causes ??? Consider this case: A sin-offering ??? an individual She and female We come to compare male, No. We come to compare ??? a male goat ??? male, ??? a guilt-offering an individual ??? will come female No. will come For ??? rabbis sacrifice ??? between privately between (in the case of a community offering) a guilt-offering privately ??? by the community ??? And if you wish, I would say who The tanna teaches: all ??? there are ??? The tanna teaches: And what does it mean when it says ??? peace-offerings and if he is required female ??? and if he is required male, ??? an individual they are obligated to replace them ??? From where in Tanach do we know this? ??? (Lev. 23) a thing day ??? This teaches for all of the day is valid ??? (Lev. 23) ??? This teaches ??? he crossed the day and not ??? he is not liable to replace them It is possible No. ??? he is liable ??? And even though ??? Scripture states: (Num. 29) ??? by night ??? tomorrow Reish Lakish: he said from here (Lev. 23) ??? Hashem And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? Hashem then I might incorrectly say: by day yes. and by night did not say he read ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and it is not written: ??? Hashem then I might incorrectly say: by night yes. ??? No. and what is the difference here, It is because of this: ??? night walks after the day It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. ??? who ??? by night For it was taught in a mishna: yes. for me except items whose ways ??? by night For example, Abraham ??? the sun ??? and they walk all the night. all of it items whose ways ??? by day For example, The fistful of a meal-offering Watch out for leading vav the frankincense and the meal-offering associated with a libation ??? the sun ??? the sun You might have thought ??? items whose ways ??? by day ??? except with Watch out for leading vav !! "And when the sun goes" ??? and they walk all the night. from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 6) this ??? The elevation-offering ??? The tanna teaches: from this ??? by day he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? He said to him: Raba If it was ??? my sanctity ??? and this was taught! This is the general rule: all ??? by day yes. ??? except by day and all ??? by night ??? by night between by day between by night ??? between by day between by night except Rav Yosef said ??? the meal-offering associated with a libation ??? For ??? Rav Dimi he found for Rav, ??? and he said in the name of Rabbi Joshua son of Levi from where do we learn ??? that come with ??? that do not ??? except by day Scripture states: (Num. 29) ??? Just as peace-offerings by day Even ??? by day he said If it was he found As it is written ??? for him According to Rav Yosef

דף יד,ב גמרא

and not ??? the meal-offering associated with a libation ??? And there is no difficulty. here, ??? those who are coming back with ??? here, ??? those who are coming back before ??? and if it was. for him ??? who ??? for this statement that Rabbi said poses a contradiction: Abba the son of Rabbi Chiyya son of Abba that R' Yochanan said ??? the Torah ??? from them he does not take the reward for ??? R' Yehudah son of Nachmeni ??? It is written one says (Ex. 34) It is written to you the things ??? and It is written one says (Ex. 34) For by the mouth of the things ??? to say to you items for upon "Here is If it was you permission ??? in writing ??? If it was you permission ??? on "Here is and It was taught in the academy of Rabbi Yishmael, It is written to you the things ??? you written but: yes. you written ??? They said: Perhaps the validity ??? that I for it is the case that Rabbi Yochanan and Reish Lakish: ??? on the Sabbath ??? thus (Ps. 119) a time to do to Hashem "they have voided Your Torah" They said: that is good for him ??? Torah and do not ??? Torah from Israel Rav Pappa said: now that you said ??? those who are coming back before ??? Even if by night ??? by night ??? by night ??? He said to him: Rav Yosef the son of of Rav for Rav, heard him ??? It was taught: ??? to you This is the general rule: all ??? by day he does not ??? except by day and all ??? by night ??? by day ??? by night Rav Adda bar Ahava said ??? of them ??? When Rav Dimi came that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? (Num. 29) ??? to Hashem ??? these obligations ??? guilt-obligation ??? on nedarim-vows to bring an offering and nedavot free-will offerings ??? of festival ??? a bamah an elevated place for offerings. is what the scripture says. If it was ??? Behold! Already say ??? and if ??? Behold! Already say ??? this one he does not ??? except ??? she will give birth ??? one suffering from tzara'at ??? a bamah an elevated place for offerings. is what the scripture says. If it was ??? Behold! Already say If it was ??? Behold! Already say this one he does not ??? except ??? Sotah ??? There is an analogy between ??? Just as peace-offerings by day Even ??? by day ??? a Nazir He said to him Abaye and let us say, Master, ??? Passover For if it was ??? a Nazir vowed as a neder-offering or brought as a freewill-offering he ??? This is the general rule: Any thing that was Watch out for leading vav or brought as a freewill-offering and vowed as a neder-offering was sacrificed ??? an individual but when it is not Watch out for leading vav or brought as a freewill-offering and vowed as a neder-offering he does not was sacrificed ??? an individual and we have learnt in a Mishna: The menuchot offerings: ??? an individual These are the words of Rabbi Meir. ??? from here euphemisms for nazarite vows who that it is possible ??? Is this not vowed as a neder-offering or brought as a freewill-offering he For it is written (II Sam 15) ??? forty year" and he said Avshalom to the king ??? please, ??? ??? who ??? to Hashem ??? For ??? Your servant etc. Is this not ??? No. ??? he said the essence ??? it was. Is it not the case that ??? it was. Rav Acha said (and there are those who say Rabbah son of Rav ??? No. he has walked Avshalom except ??? So, here, ??? For if it was you say ??? he ??? Jerusalem and it comes ??? and Rather, what can we conclude? ??? This who ??? to Hashem ??? should bring himself But rather, in reality lit: in the world, ??? and that he came it is a problem to you why is it that ??? Jerusalem ??? to you ??? he except immediately ??? all in a case who seeks ??? forty year" for one It was taught: Rabbi ??? says It is because of this: Rabbi Yehoshua ??? forty year" ??? to them a king as it is taught: it year" ??? to them a king it year" ??? of Shmuel it was

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.