It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כא,א גמרא

himself No. Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? female and until the end of the world. No. ??? one male, He said to him ??? For example, ??? until the end of the world.

דף כא,א משנה

??? the first-born and the tithe ??? until the end of the world. Behold! these ??? Just as between first-born ??? to among all ??? for all of ??? ??? except for the first-born and the tithe and there is regarding them redemption ??? redemption except for the first-born and the tithe and have come ??? except for the first-born and the tithe ??? and if ??? Thus said Rabbi Shimon What is the reason? ??? and the tithe there is regarding them livelihood. ??? but the remainder of all ??? despite the fact ??? at them." ??? Behold! these ???

דף כא,א גמרא

Rabba said: son of Rav ??? we asked in the west ??? first-born ??? What then? who say immediately that is not ??? No. ??? or perhaps, immediately ??? He said to him Abaye ??? to you ??? of tithe Rather, what can we conclude? ??? that is not ??? to you ??? (Lev. 27) ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? So, here, the Merciful One ??? (in Numbers 18) No. ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use are these are these ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he would say over to it thus Rabbi Acha says: the son of of Rav ??? we asked in the west ??? of tithe What then? He said to him ??? to you ??? first-born ??? except What is the difference ??? first-born ??? that is not ??? to you ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use are these there are. ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? of tithe also the Merciful One ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? and if ??? They challenged this from a baraita: son of ??? raised up ??? and not ??? from him Rav Chisdah said There is no difficulty. this one R' Yishmael this one R' ??? as it is taught: R' Yosei says three items It is because of this: three elders Rabbi Yishmael says It is possible he shall ascend a person second tithe in these times (nowadays) ??? in Jerusalem It would be a logical inference first-born required ??? a place ??? required ??? a place Just as first-born is not eaten except before the house Even tithe is not eaten except before the house No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? which provides required the giving of ??? to join with the body of An altar of shall you say ??? that is not is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? a place ??? required ??? a place Just as ??? yes. they are eaten except before the house Even tithe yes. is eaten except before the house Just as ??? which provides ??? shall you say ??? that is not Therefore, scripture states: (Deut. 14) "And you shall eat before Hashem your God tithe ??? tithe ??? Just as first-born is not eaten except before the house Even tithe yes. is eaten except before the house ??? judgement and he shall take a bamah an elevated place for offerings. the trapping of Rav Ashi said It is because of this: That there are to say Just as ??? regarding them which provides there are of them trapping of An altar of and What then is the reasoning of If his reasoning is "Kedushah" the first ??? in the future in going They did not teach this לא שנו first-born and there is no difference tithe My son, ??? And if his reasoning is "Kedushah" the first ??? and not ??? in the future in going even first-born also ??? to you In reality lit: In the world his reasoning is "Kedushah" the first ??? and not ??? in the future in going and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? of first-born before the house ??? the house ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived immediately For if it was ??? No. son of ??? he will come meat he learns it ???

דף כא,ב גמרא

and comes tithe and he learns it ??? and who ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? Yochanan all the Torah All of it ??? teach from ??? except for ??? that do not ??? teach from ??? tithe Those who are ill he This is satistfactory for one for he said: according to teach do we go? except ??? according to This teaches do we go? What is there to say? flesh and blood it is a single observance Rabbi Akiva says: It is possible he shall ascend a person first-born ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 14) "And you shall eat before Hashem your God tithe ??? that you ??? tithe grain you ??? first-born ??? you ??? tithe grain If it was you ??? first-born ben Azzai says It is possible ??? second tithe ??? in all the one who sees It would be a logical inference first-born required ??? a place ??? required ??? a place Just as first-born is not eaten except within the walls Even tithe is not eaten except within the walls Just as ??? which provides required the giving of ??? to join with the body of An altar of shall you say ??? that is not Scripture states: "And you shall eat before Hashem your God tithe ??? There is an analogy between tithe ??? Just as first-born is not eaten except within the walls Even tithe is not eaten except within the walls What then does it mean when it says has a problem for he says It is possible is what you say? Do you really mean that? Because and we have learnt in a Mishna: There is no difference between Shilo to Jerusalem except that in Shilo they eat simple offerings and second tithe in all the one who sees but in Jerusalem within the walls ??? The holiest of holy offerings within the curtains What would you have said? in Jerusalem he shall take second tithe in all the one who sees ??? others say It is possible ??? first-born ??? Therefore, scripture states: tithe ??? There is an analogy between first-born ??? Just as tithe he does not ??? Even first-born he does not ??? and According to the sages, ??? them ??? other than this ??? them ??? them (Deut. 15) before Me Hashem your God ??? year" in the year ??? on the first-born that is not ??? and to others before Hashem your God ??? year" in the year What then does it mean when it says ??? of him. should bring himself to account for that which was taught one day ??? -- this refers to and one day ??? on the first-born ??? for two days and one night And the rabbbis ??? days and one night ??? them Scripture states: (in Numbers 18) it shall be to you ???

דף כא,ב משנה

The offspring of a sin-offering and the substitute for a sin-offering and a sin-offering whose owner has died it shall be left to die of natural causes A sin-offering which has passed its year and is too old to offer or which was lost, and then found with a disqualifying blemish, if its owners have atoned they shall be allowed to die of natural causes And they do not make a substitute

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.