It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כז,א גמרא

(Lev. 13) and if underneath it ??? As it is written (Is. 60) under ??? gold and Therefore, regarding my sanctity An altar of ??? substitute offerings? ??? he regarding my sanctity ??? the house that is not ??? substitute offerings? ??? he Rabba said: even ??? An altar of It concerns itself ??? he For example, that he was that which was sanctified for Temple use the master of ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? even ??? also It concerns itself ??? weekday you shall ??? he tried Abaye they were before him two ??? of and that which was sanctified for Temple use at the offering of ??? and two ??? of Those who are ill ??? and he said Behold! these under these What then? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? ??? or, perhaps, all in a case That there are ??? No. ??? and does he act? ??? all in a case That there are ??? No. ??? and does he act? ??? they were before him two ??? of ??? and one from them ??? and two ??? of Those who are ill and one from them ??? and he said Behold! these under these What then? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? ??? under ??? under ??? or, perhaps, ??? under ??? under ??? both of them. ??? and if Scripture states: all in a case That there are ??? No. does he act? ??? he and not ??? they were before him three ??? of and that which was sanctified for Temple use and one from them ??? and three ??? of Those who are ill ??? and he said Behold! these under these who say ??? under ??? also under ??? or, perhaps, Here in this case, also, all in a case That there are ??? No. does he act? ??? and this particular the final one -- ??? you shall and if ??? to say Here in this case, also, immediately ??? a person No. ??? No. ??? and does he act? ??? he is required Rav Ashi they were before him four ??? of and that which was sanctified for Temple use and one from them ??? and four ??? of Those who are ill and he said Behold! these under these What then? Here in this case, certainly immediately ??? a person ??? in four, ??? or, perhaps, even though ??? No. ??? and does he act? ??? you shall the final one -- ??? you shall ??? if it was that which was sanctified for Temple use the master of ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? that R' Yochanan said he has fulfilled his obligation ??? So says the Torah. and it is necessary to do ??? and Reish Lakish: he said Even It is necessary for him to do ??? So says the Torah. with what are we dealing? If you were to say ??? In this case, Let him say Reish Lakish: Even It is necessary for him to do ??? Hey, isn't it the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: these items that do not to them ??? and contracts ??? except ??? a purchase In this case, Let him say R' Yochanan It is necessary for him to do ???

דף כז,ב גמרא

For didn't Rabbi say ??? And Rabbi ??? he said ??? in the name of R' Yochanan They said: ??? Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? a purchase there are to them In reality lit: In the world ??? a purchase ??? and who seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? This is satistfactory ??? and how much more so ??? except for one for he said: ??? but: ??? Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? a purchase in what way does ??? about this teaching he said Rabbi ??? No. ??? Let us say, ??? for Shmuel said: that which was sanctified for Temple use the value of a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? on the value of ??? For R' ??? he does not have of Shmuel And Rabbi ??? it has of Shmuel No. between ??? or whether ??? it has of Shmuel of Rabbi ??? reasoned For Shmuel said once it has been done but: initially did not say And Rabbi ??? reasoned even initially And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world No. ??? and that he came it is a problem to you Our mishna these items ??? Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? for he said: Rav Chisda Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? are not ??? that even less than ??? he returns Ulla said Watch out for leading vav And they did not say except ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two but: ??? and even though ??? in a case where there are one hundred No. he returns Really? For didn't Rav say ??? in a case he said hundred ??? and two ??? in the matter of giving witness but: in the matter of ??? according to ??? do we go? And, too, three three No. do we go? according to that was last ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use on the upper one his reasoning is ??? It is necessary for him to do ??? and all is a law established by the Rabbis ??? of it rabbis

דף כז,ב משנה

Behold! This is under an elevation-offering under A sin-offering did not say anything under A sin-offering -- this refers to and under an elevation-offering -- this refers to under A sin-offering and under an elevation-offering in which there is for me in the house of he was to him his words ??? he said on ??? that is tamei and on ??? Behold! these an elevation-offering did not say anything Behold! these ??? an elevation-offering

דף כז,ב גמרא

Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? that is not like Rabbi ??? For if it was like Rabbi Meir this one yes. a person sent forth his words ??? Behold! these ??? The reason is ??? that is tamei ??? that is not ??? No. in that case ??? but: ??? female ??? or ??? in that case ??? R' Yehudah said: Rav said ??? that is not like Rabbi Shimon For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Shimon says: ??? that did not have ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.