It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כח,א משנה

all ??? to join with the body of An altar of forbid in all that are ??? ??? and he goes out the wall Who is muktzeh ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry he is forbidden for just as ??? is permitted. and Who is ??? all that they worship lit: serve that specific he for just as ??? is forbidden and both this and this is permitted. in cases regarding eating

דף כח,א גמרא

Mar said: forbid in all that are that is not ??? all ??? die or ??? Even if one in a case where there are ten thousand it shall be left to die of natural causes it is a problem to us What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? of them ??? die or ox ??? even in a case where there are ten thousand it shall be left to die of natural causes It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say there i.e., in another mishna he ??? benefit But here, in this case, ??? benefit I would say ??? Come and learn from this. ??? also ??? until ??? for the value proper regarding them ??? Rav said ??? in front of Rav ??? son of ??? He said to me: one ??? and one ??? and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was ??? regarding holy offerings It is because of this: ??? but: regarding Those who are ill I would say ??? also ??? and these are forbidden and forbid in all that are wine ??? one suffering from tzara'at and skins pierced at the heart ??? a Nazir and he exempted a donkey meat ??? and Those who are ill ??? in the courtyard ??? Behold! these are forbidden and forbid in all that are It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was we had heard there i.e., in another mishna ??? benefit that is not ??? But here, in this case, ??? and if ??? Here in this case, ??? but: ??? I would say ??? benefit ??? Come and learn from this. ??? From where do we derive this? ??? For the Rabbis taught (Lev. 1) from ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as the master of ??? that did not have ??? of it transgression is invalid, to join with the body of An altar of ??? of them transgression is it not logical ??? to join with the body of An altar of plowing ??? and a donkey He corrects ??? in it transgression and it is permitted to join with the body of An altar of Just as ??? and a donkey that do not they are obligated death shall you say ??? death ??? to you Just as ??? Behold! ??? of them transgression with two witnesses ??? of them transgression by the mouth of a single witness or by the mouth of ??? from where do we learn Rabbi Shimon said: I ??? for just as the master of ??? that do not ??? two witnesses ??? a single witness ??? two witnesses ??? is it not logical ??? a single witness ??? Scripture states: from ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? Hey, isn't it the case that We come to compare ???

דף כח,ב גמרא

Rav Ashi said It is because of this: That there are to say from the beginning that judgement ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? shall you say ??? that do not ??? Because And there is no meaning to the word ??? is valid to join with the body of An altar of Scripture states: (Lev. 1) from ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? from the morning to discharge the mitzvah ??? Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as ??? are permitted there are. are forbidden ??? is forbidden is it not logical that he was is forbidden or ??? for just as ??? that are are forbidden ??? are permitted ??? when it is permitted ??? is permitted. If so, ??? (Deut. 7) Do not covet silver and gold upon them ??? to you I ??? Do not covet silver and gold In the matter in which is not the spirit of life but: In the matter in which there is in it the spirit of life Because there are. is permitted. It is possible ??? is permitted. Scripture states: from the morning to discharge the mitzvah ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? The reason is ??? he read this one No. ??? he read ??? is permitted. For it is written (Deut. 12) "and you shall be destroyed their names all ??? This certain individual ??? to them in that place he who has arrived ??? we recite that specific the house of ??? the face of ??? the face of ??? well all well ??? I from ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? from the morning to discharge the mitzvah ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? it is written regarding livestock (Lev. 20) a man For He shall give" ??? shall certainly die" regarding mornings it is written (Ps. 106) ??? ??? ox he eats "grass (Lev. 1) from ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? and from ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? if it is said ??? why is it said ??? and if it is said ??? why is it said ??? on account of ??? Just as that do not thus ??? there are ??? makes compulsion ??? Just as that do not thus ??? there are ??? must make restitution ??? Just as that do not thus ??? to say ??? to say ??? and that one a Tanna taught: ??? to it from here as it is taught: ??? are these ??? transgresses ??? they all require ??? about them as it is said For ??? at them." ??? with them." What then does it mean when it says ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: from where do we learn that are are forbidden Scripture states: (Lev. 22) For ??? at them." ??? with them." and it was taught of the academy of R' Yishmael in all places as it is said ??? he does not except a thing ??? a thing ??? As it is written (Gen. 6) For ??? all meat etc. by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry As it is written (Deut. 4) ??? to you ??? all ??? all ??? invalidates it of them a thing ??? invalidate it of them and it was taught of the academy of R' Yishmael from ??? from the morning and from ??? What then does it mean when it says he expounds. in them? should bring himself creates an exclusion ??? an elderly person ??? And the first tanna ??? an ill person an elderly person ??? for him ??? for him from ??? from ??? and from ??? and a Tanna of the academy of R' Yishmael ??? Who is muktzeh some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry ??? he said Reish Lakish: yes. is forbidden except muktzeh ??? two as it is said (Judges 6) And it was by night This certain individual and he said ??? "Take A bull the ox who ??? and A bull the second "satisfied" two and there in that case muktzeh ??? it was. ??? also it was. Rabbi Acha says: son of Ya'akov muktzeh ??? and not ??? Rava said: In reality lit: In the world ??? he It is like that which was said by Rabbi Abba son of ??? for he said: Rabbi Abba bar Kahana eight items they permitted ??? night except and night ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.