It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כט,א גמרא

and implements of ??? an Ashera and muktzeh ??? Rav said excessive ??? son of gifts R' Yoshaia said: from where do we learn ??? from the Torah as it is said (Num. 28) ??? for me ??? all ??? to him "Standing watch" He disagreed with this Abaye Except I can object with text from here: ??? and not does he act? for him "Standing watch" So, here, that is not they saw ??? I ??? for me ??? for me and not ??? after and Who is after ??? to him you shall says -- this refers to by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry Rabba said: son of Rav ??? Rav said Isaac yes. muktzeh is forbidden except until ??? that R' Yochanan said until ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry In this case, Rabbi Yochanan said: until ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry He said to him: Rabbi Abba ??? You ??? He said to him No. ??? also and thus he comes to say he ??? for him ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry Thus said Rabbi Abba know In this case, ??? and if No. ??? there i.e., in another mishna It was not know ??? Israel ??? for him He said to him: Rav Isaac In this case, ??? it was. For Rav learned: ??? in front of R' Yochanan yes. muktzeh is forbidden except until ??? in it It once happened he It was taught by to it and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had he said to it What then does it mean when it says It once happened until ??? Who is ??? From where do we derive this? Rav Pappa said: For scripture said: (Ezek. 45) ??? Israel from ??? to Israel And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? why do I have he read ??? and all in a case ??? it does not require he read Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he read ??? as it is taught: For as it says: from the morning to the bottom that do not Scripture states: except to discharge the mitzvah ??? It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: What case is he dealing with? ??? and after this ??? but: ??? and after this ??? I would say ??? Hey, isn't it the case that from here ??? (Lev. 27) all who under passes over ??? creates an exclusion ??? that is not ??? This certain individual also It is necessary to teach this You might have thought that I would say that What case is he dealing with? in a case that is not it was to it ??? cubits but: in a case ??? to it ??? and was it taken out ??? the world. and after this ??? I would say ??? Come and learn from this.

דף כט,א משנה

and Who is ??? One who says ??? this ??? Even if there are. ??? all of them are forbidden and thus One who says to his fellow ??? this ??? next to my slave Rabbi ??? says he does not ??? But the sages say: ???

דף כט,א גמרא

Mar said: and even there are. hundred all of them are forbidden How so? Shall I say ??? The reward hundred ??? This is obvious! ??? What do I have to learn from one What do I have to learn from hundred it is not necessary to teach this ??? The reward one and he will give to it hundred ??? The Rabbis taught he gave to it and does not come upon it came upon it and it was not given to it ??? is permitted. he gave to it and does not come upon it ??? for him And, too, came upon it and it was not given to it What then does it mean when it says he will give to it except Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: he gave to it and after this came upon it came upon it and after this he gave to it ??? is permitted. ??? upon it ??? at the end of eating, before they leave Rabbi Eliezer said

דף כט,ב גמרא

??? How so? If you were to say ??? This is obvious! ??? that until here, does not come upon it So rather, for he said: to it No. ??? until ??? who ??? for him (Lev. 27) a man For ??? his house and that which was sanctified for Temple use to Hashem the Merciful One in the Torah says Just as his house ??? Even all ??? it is not necessary to teach this for he said: to it No. ??? to you until ??? and if ??? to you ??? to you ??? he is required Rav Oshaya: to the east ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him from that of Rabbi ??? For Rabbi Eliezer said: to the east ??? She for it is the case that ??? in the hour of ??? but: ??? is forbidden She ??? for him ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? in the hour of ??? is permitted. but: ??? in the hour of ??? is forbidden or, perhaps, immediately For it was taught in a baraita ??? is permitted. and all the more so ??? came upon it and after this he gave to it ??? For it was taught: came upon it and gave to it And even if until two ten new ??? is forbidden Rav said ??? son of Rav Chisda There is no difficulty. this one for he said: to it ??? for me nullification this this one for he said: to it ??? for me nullification ??? this Hey, isn't it the case that ??? some texts read: a worshipper of stars some texts read: a female gentile lit., stranger that is not ??? And if you wish, I would say Even if ??? For example, and it was standing ??? this one ??? to it from the beginning ??? to it ??? and he said to it if until day so-and-so ??? to you ??? that is good for him And if not, ??? Rav said one ??? male, and one ??? all ??? is forbidden except ??? his wife a menstruant What is the reason מאי טעמא (Deut. 23) ??? it is written Hey, isn't it the case that Is this not ??? She and Levi said even his wife a menstruant What is the reason? (Deut. 23) an abomination it is written Hey, isn't it the case that an abomination She and Levi also For it is written ??? He could say to you this particular ??? and not ??? Rav this particular ??? and not ??? for him from that of Rabbi as it is taught: Rabbi says yes. ??? is forbidden except all ??? to him ??? but: ??? his wife a menstruant ??? to it the reward for ??? and that was given to him ??? are permitted even though there isn't proof for the matter there is an allusion to the matter (Ezek. 17) ??? No. ??? and she became ??? Rav This an abomination What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? for Abaye said: ??? some texts read: a worshipper of stars ??? is forbidden What is the reason מאי טעמא It is written here an abomination And it is written there (Lev. 18) For all who may he do it? from all ??? Just as there ??? that do not ??? of it So, here, yes. ??? of it and a priest upon it came yes. ??? upon it It is because of this: ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא For scripture said: (Lev. 21) No. ??? who ??? after him: he has fulfilled his obligation some texts read: a worshipper of stars some texts read: a female gentile lit., stranger ??? after him: ??? is permitted. What is the reason? for it is the case that ??? of it and a priest upon it came ??? It is because of this: ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא for it is the case that ??? after him: And Rabba said One of these and one of these ??? is forbidden and a priest that comes upon it ??? It is because of this: ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? Just as ??? Even ??? some texts read: a worshipper of stars some texts read: a female gentile lit., stranger ??? for just as ??? some texts read: a worshipper of stars some texts read: a female gentile lit., stranger is forbidden Even ??? is forbidden They challenged him from this teaching: one ??? some texts read: a worshipper of stars ??? and one ??? is forbidden ??? He could say to you Abaye So, with whom does it agree? R' ??? She for he said: yes. ??? And hey, you can also come and hear from this. ??? No. ??? of it ??? is equivalent ??? that is not ??? of it ??? and to Raba what is the difference here, where he teaches For example, a widow ??? is equivalent ??? Just as a widow No. ??? until ??? of it Even ??? until one said: this one to you To exclude from that of Rabbi ??? For Rabbi Eliezer said: ??? that comes on ??? that did not have for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? it was made ??? but: in a case ??? from the beginning So, here, ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: this one ??? that do not ??? of it Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: at the end of the teaching, a widow ??? The greatness a divorcee or a chalutzah ??? is forbidden Hey, isn't it the case that Behold! ??? of them So, with whom does it agree?

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.