It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

on of his fellow ??? benefit are his He said to him there i.e., in another mishna he ??? Israel It is because of this: thus do we go? according to ??? and it was for him ??? in the hand of Israel But here, in this case, thus ??? for him who in the case of ??? and until the end of ??? one that He performs substitute offerings? ??? Mar said: ??? some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. benefit may not be derived from them, According to Rabbinic law, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. according to Torah law, What is the reason מאי טעמא As it is written (Lev. 5) ??? For ??? from by ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? it is written (in Numbers 18) the Children of Israel and not some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles And there is no meaning to the word they are obligated upon them It is because of this: pigul, notar, and tamei As it is written of it ??? (Lev. 22) "Speak to ??? and do not his children ??? the Children of Israel and not ??? in that place ??? and he learns it notar ??? from tumah As it is written regarding ??? (Lev. 22) the Children of Israel and not ??? etc. and then it is written regarding notar (Lev. 19) ??? for and that which was sanctified for Temple use Hashem ??? and he learns it an invalidating act nevertheless iniquity iniquity ??? As it is written regarding an invalidating act nevertheless (Lev. 7) ??? from him answer ??? and then it is written regarding notar (Lev. 19) ??? for and that which was sanctified for Temple use Hashem ??? and all of them the Children of Israel and not some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles And we do not make substitute offerings? As it is written (Lev. 27) No. ??? and not ??? and then it is written ??? one topic (Lev. 27) "Speak to the Children of Israel" ??? a man For ??? And we do not make substitute offerings? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? livestock for tithing animals ??? livestock ??? grain and regarding tithe grain it is written (in Numbers 18) ??? tithe the Children of Israel who ??? to Hashem the Children of Israel and not ??? And there is no meaning to the word sends ??? but: its sacrifice required ??? these are the words of Rabbi ??? From where do we learn this? For the Rabbis taught (Num. 15) ??? sends ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? sends ??? It is possible she will not be ??? require ??? Scripture states: ??? he said R' Yosi one who sees I in all of them ??? What is the reason? to Hashem it is written of him. In what matters are we saying this? ??? An altar of but: ??? the house We apply the laws of misappropriation to them What is the reason מאי טעמא and so when we complete it the laws of misappropriation of sacred things Watch out for leading vav he sinned Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? is equivalent ??? the sanctity of ??? but: ??? the house ??? did not say Rav Yehudah Rav said all No. shall you do in the Torah One who acts of it It once happened he is liable No. One who acts of it It once happened is exempt ??? he ??? in which is not It once happened is exempt Consider this case: ??? in which is not It once happened he ??? For it was taught in a baraita No. that he was permission ??? except ??? ??? Rav would say to you So, with whom does it agree? it is Rabbi Yehudah for he said: Is this not in which is not It once happened ??? upon it and who seeks ??? like R' Yehudah Hey, isn't it the case that have you established that it is ??? does not rule like Rabbi Yehudah where he teaches The entirety ??? The entirety ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? and does not rule like Rabbi Yehudah This a Tanna taught: derive it ??? in which is not It once happened ??? upon it ??? upon it ??? For this Rabbi Yehudah reasoned ??? he does not "??? is a support he does not ??? and it was taught ??? reasoned ??? "??? is a support Rav said Idi bar Avin Rav said ??? R' Yitzchak said that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: R' Yosi the Gallilean all No. shall you do ??? One who acts in it It once happened ??? No. One who acts in it It once happened is exempt except ??? his fellow at the Name even though that did not have One who acts It once happened he is liable It is because of this: Rabbi Yosei the son of Rabbi Chanina And they said Even ??? terumah ??? "From where do we derive this? has sworn that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 20) For No. ??? Hashem those whom ??? was his name ??? a court of ???

דף ג,ב גמרא

yes. ??? that specific but: a court of a bed ??? that specific ??? that specific He said to him Rav ??? and so go ahead and say No. ??? for him ??? A general principle: He said to him If so, to write he read No. ??? Hashem why do I have a court of ??? he ??? that specific but: a court בית דין of a bed ??? that specific ??? without worth ??? that is false From where do we derive this? Rabbi Yochanan that are his he said ??? two occasions if he does not one topic ??? without worth ??? one topic ??? that is false ??? He disagreed with this Rabbi Abahu ??? that is false How so? If you were to say for he said: that did not have he eats he ate there i.e., in another mishna he It once happened a slave So rather, for he said: ??? and not he ate This certain individual who ??? a loaf this the day and he crossed the day and not he ate Rabbi Yochanan and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? They said: he does not ??? R' Yochanan says he does not ??? in which is not It once happened he and all Is this not in which is not It once happened yes. ??? upon it and Reish Lakish: he said he does not ??? It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? doubt whether and all ??? doubt whether yes. ??? upon it except R' Abahu said shall be ??? and not ??? and what is the difference here, that he came ??? and not ??? and not he ate Rabba said: in a clarifying explanation ??? Torah that is false ??? Just as without worth on that which was in the past Even that is false on that which was in the past ??? Rabbi ??? to Rabbi ??? that did not have he eats a loaf -- this refers to ??? that did not have ??? that did not have ??? he is not liable except One ??? on ??? and on ??? sacrifice an elevation-offering and descends ??? Is this not ??? and not ??? that is not ??? No. This is ??? sacrifice but: ??? and not ??? No. ??? sacrifice with whom does it agree? Rabbi Yishmael She for he said: he is not liable except on the future in going but: ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? without worth ??? on ??? and on ??? is exempt ??? Is this not ??? and not ??? that is not ??? No. ??? is exempt ??? but: ??? and not ??? sacrifice with whom does it agree? Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva for he said: bring in sacrifice on that which was in the past Hey, isn't it the case that is what you say? Do you really mean that? But the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi Yishmael except ??? Rabbi Akiva But the beginning of the teaching, also Rabbi Akiva and the beginning of the teaching, Is this not ??? and not ??? except ??? he eats and not he ate and what is the difference here, It is because of this: and it was standing ??? he arises ??? He said to him Rabbi Yochanan a Tanna No. ??? It is because of this: ??? One who acts ??? his fellow ??? From where do we derive this? R' Elazar said R' Osha'ya said Scripture states: (Deut. 28) if No. ??? and then it is written (Deut. 28) ??? Hashem ??? -- this refers to Really? know What then? For as it says: (Deut. 25) ??? before him you shall says ??? -- this refers to ??? I will say even ??? "true" clearly and explicitly it is written (Ex. 22) ??? Hashem ??? between both I will say What case is he dealing with? ??? his fellow but: ??? No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? (Deut. 6) ??? This certain individual should bring himself ??? For Rav Gidal said that Rav said from where do we learn ??? to establish the commandments. as it is said (Ps. 119) ??? to watch the statutes of Your righteousness." it is written he read other than this (Deut. 10) in it ??? except for what he came ??? his fellow at the Name and so go ahead and say ??? in that place heaven ??? who ??? his fellow at the Name ??? in that place heaven ??? We thus ??? it is a problem to us I would say sent forth in that place heaven ??? for him ??? but: ??? his fellow at the Name immediately ??? both that he came ??? in that place heaven ??? for him ??? No. ??? for him ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.