It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לא,א גמרא

??? she gave birth to ??? It concerns itself For example, ??? and in the end ??? In this case, ??? of Rabbi Eliezer reasoned both this and this ??? is forbidden And the rabbbis reason that both this and this ??? is permitted. ??? It is not raw lit., living It concerns itself For example, ??? and in the end ??? In this case, ??? of Rabbi Eliezer reasoned transgresses ??? of its mother he And the rabbbis reason that transgresses Is this not ??? of its mother he Thus said Rabbi ??? "We thank..." the sages to R' Eliezer ??? that he is forbidden What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? does not disagree upon it of Rabbi Eliezer except ??? livestock ??? but: ??? Even if rabbis ??? Raba said to him to Rav Huna. It was taught: ??? to you fill ??? Rabbi Eliezer become tamei and the sages ??? Up to this point, does not disagree rabbis upon it except ??? in reality he but: An egg ??? he even rabbis ??? He said to him Abaye ??? No. ??? R' Eliezer upon them is a law established by the Rabbis except ??? a person ??? As it is written (Job 25) ??? son of a person ??? but: regarding An egg ??? And so ??? in reality ??? Even if ??? give thanks And furthermore, It was taught: clearly and explicitly give thanks ??? to the sages ??? when it is permitted He said to him If it was It was taught: ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? says is valid ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא Shall I say ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? idolatry So, here, ??? except It was taught by R' Chaninah ??? in front of Rabbi Yochanan For example, ??? milk ??? Because and it is possible to stand upon it ??? all ??? yes. ??? From where in Tanach do we know this? ??? (Deut. 12) ??? and not ??? "And you shall eat and not ??? meat and not milk from here that do not ??? ??? for dogs that it is possible that they said ??? "And you shall eat yes. to you of them permission except ??? his reasoning is ??? ??? for dogs

דף לא,א משנה

there are ??? An altar of that do not ??? the house and there are ??? the house that do not ??? An altar of ??? An altar of doing substitute offerings? ??? the house Watch out for leading vav And we do not make substitute offerings? my sanctity ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: pigul, notar, and tamei

דף לא,ב משנה

??? is forbidden after ??? outside he is liable yes. ??? from them ??? for their wages, Just as that do not thus ??? the house there are ??? the house ??? the house that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? the house ??? on The entirety they are subject to the laws of misappropriation ??? and They do not have benefit ???

דף לא,ב גמרא

??? he ??? my sanctity An altar of doing substitute offerings? Consider this case: ??? An altar of there are. and we have learnt in a Mishna: The menuchot offerings: ??? Watch out for leading vav And we do not make substitute offerings? And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? Consider this case: ??? my sanctity An altar of he and we have learnt in a Mishna: yes. ??? they shall make a substitution. So, with whom does it agree? it is R' Yehudah for he said: ??? they shall make a substitution. Consider this case: substitute offerings? herself ??? An altar of and we have learnt in a Mishna: yes. substitute offerings? they shall make a substitution. And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? Now that you have come to this understanding, you can apply the same understanding to this other problem: Even if you say rabbis And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? from them ??? this one my sanctity ??? the house ??? R' Abahu said For scripture said: (Ex. 25) "and they shall make for me ??? there are ??? the house ??? Mar said: ??? the house ??? on The entirety Which Tanna taught: Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said that is not ??? Joshua as it is taught: ??? and it was the case that of them livestock ??? to join with the body of An altar of ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? peace-offerings ??? with the remainder of items of movable property ??? the house Rabbi Yehoshua says: ??? there are. ??? peace-offerings ??? but the remainder of items of movable property ??? the house and disagrees of Rav ??? son of love for he said: Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? Rav said ??? Even if R' Eliezer give thanks that is not ??? my sanctity An altar of ??? the house No. ??? except ??? in which there is in it ??? and R' Eliezer reasoned yes. ??? ??? Is this not ??? also Is this not ??? and R' Yehoshua reasoned ??? ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And there are those who say it was Rav Adda bar Ahava said Rav said ??? except livestock Even if ??? give thanks that is not ??? my sanctity An altar of ??? the house No. ??? except ??? the remainder of items of movable property with them ??? reasoned yes. a person ??? ??? items of movable property No. ??? An altar of livestock also No. ??? An altar of and Rabbi Yehoshua reasoned a person ??? ??? with the remainder of items of movable property ??? the house This is satisfactory to the teaching that was last we were where he teaches with the remainder of items of movable property ??? the house except to the teaching that came first Let the Tanna teach: ??? the house Another teaching is like this: ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? the house ??? on ??? What then does it mean when it says Ravina said ??? they are subject to the laws of misappropriation ??? it uses these particular words to include what? Rav Pappa said: to include ??? milk ??? As it is taught: milk ??? benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. In what matters are we saying this? ??? An altar of but: ??? the house ??? they are subject to the laws of misappropriation ??? is stricter they are subject to the laws of misappropriation ??? and even for one for he said: they are subject to the laws of misappropriation ??? An altar of that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: ??? that is not they saw ??? We do not apply the laws of misappropriation to them

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.