It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לב,א משנה

one my sanctity An altar of and one my sanctity ??? the house yes. ??? those particular ??? to "Kedushah", ??? those particular that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? those particular and if Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? ??? Rabbi Shimon says: my sanctity ??? the house if Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? ???

דף לב,א גמרא

Rav Huna said my sanctity An altar of ??? priests No. One who acts anything What is the reason? Scripture states: (Lev. 27) all ban" and that which was sanctified for Temple use holy offerings he to Hashem all ban" ??? holy offerings you shall This certain individual to Hashem ??? They challenged him from this teaching: my sanctity ??? the house ??? between ??? An altar of between ??? priests No. One who acts anything ??? priests ??? between ??? An altar of between ??? the house No. One who acts anything this one my sanctity An altar of ??? priests Just as the one who did ??? For Rav Huna Rav would say to you ??? For ??? An altar of ??? the house Just as the one who did ??? but: ??? priests No. One who acts anything ??? regarding ??? a Tanna taught: that there is in it: both The tanna teaches: ??? of him. both No. The tanna teaches: We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? those particular that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? Is this not that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? a priest No. This and this my sanctity ??? and there is no difference ??? them ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? the house and there is no difference ??? them ??? the house Hey, isn't it the case that No. It was taught by thus as it is taught: ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? my sanctity ??? the house ??? priests And furthermore, This was taught my sanctity An altar of ??? priests Just as the one who did ??? For Rav Huna ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Huna he read he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Ulla said Scripture states: ban" all ban" And who said it? ??? thus for this statement that ??? said poses a contradiction: an elevation-offering ??? there is not there except ???

דף לב,ב גמרא

??? only. ??? and he read ??? who has arrived ??? what is the purpose according to him he read The holiest of holy offerings it is written of him. ??? this one for thus said Rabbi ??? yes. the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? from the Torah except the case is that of an elevation-offering, only. as it is said (Lev. 5) ??? For ??? from by ??? Hashem ??? to Hashem but: A sin-offering and a guilt-offering No. ??? except from that of Rabbi as it is taught: Rabbi says (Lev. 3) all milk to Hashem ??? The offal of simple offerings ??? why do I have he read The holiest of holy offerings it is written in them? except even though ??? holy offerings it is written in them? he is required he read ??? euphemisms for bans also even though ??? holy offerings it is written in them? he is required he read ??? Back to the main body of the text: ??? an elevation-offering ??? there is not there except ??? only. They challenged him from this teaching: ??? an elevation-offering ??? is forbidden ??? until ??? According to Rabbinic law, So, here, ??? When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, if he crossed and it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it Just as the one who did ??? Rather, what can we conclude? According to Rabbinic law, If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, they are subject to the laws of misappropriation two misappropriations of sanctified items and if ??? According to Rabbinic law, why is it that two misappropriations of sanctified items thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? of it two ??? and if Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? ??? that R' Yochanan said According to the sages, one my sanctity An altar of and one my sanctity The academy of Hillel they were are in the general category ??? and Reish Lakish: he said According to the sages, my sanctity The academy of Hillel they were are in the general category ??? my sanctity An altar of No. they were are in the general category ??? and both this and this give thanks ??? The academy of Hillel No. they were are in the general category ??? and my sanctity An altar of they were are in the general category ??? the master of ??? No. he was are in the general category ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: Rabbi Shimon says: my sanctity ??? the house ??? This is satisfactory to Rabbi Yochanan for he said: According to the sages, One of these and one of these they were are in the general category ??? we were ??? Rabbi Shimon ??? my sanctity ??? the house ??? except ??? what is the purpose according to him ??? Let us say, if Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? ??? He could say to you ??? Rabbi Shimon It was not know What then does it mean when it says for he said: Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna This is what he means: for him If it was ??? An altar of ??? to you ??? the house if Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? ??? It was taught: ??? of Rabbi Yochanan (Lev. 27) if livestock who ??? from it ??? is what the scripture says. You say ??? Or perhaps, except ??? that is tamei For as it says: (Lev. 27) if ??? that is tamei and "He redeemed ??? Behold! livestock that is tamei say

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.