It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ז,א גמרא

??? I thought to say This is satisfactory from the beginning No. ??? If it was This ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of But here, in this case, immediately ??? in that place No. ??? Mar said: It is because of this: Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah Even ??? the blood What is the reason? of R' Yosi ??? Yehudah Scripture states: (Lev. 22) ??? etc. -- this refers to ??? the blood who said Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah and a Tanna that came first This No. ??? why do I have should bring himself ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? for him from by the altar of ??? thus and Rabbi Yosei, ??? Yehudah also ??? he yes. So, here, except ??? the blood ??? for him ??? for him ??? (Lev. 22) immediately son of ??? No. ??? This is ??? the blood who said Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah and a Tanna that came first This No. ??? why do I have should bring himself for this ??? I thought to say Because and not ??? My son, ??? except on ??? Abraham there is no difference with the altar ??? and there is no difference with the altar ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says Even on ??? the blood What is the reason? As it is written ??? etc. No. ??? -- this refers to ??? the blood ??? for him from by the altar of and According to the sages, also Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough them ??? from on the altar of Here, too, So rather, No. ??? for what he came ??? an individual and to Rabbi Yosei: ??? Yehudah This should bring himself ??? an individual yes. Here, too, except ??? for him immediately son of ??? No. ??? -- this refers to ??? the blood And the rabbbis It was necessary to provide both opinions ??? I thought to say Because and the sons of ??? yes. ??? except on ??? Perhaps We also ??? Come and hear from this from all ??? that is not ??? He disagreed with this Reish Lakish: lest No. We learned: except ??? that it was made the master of ??? and transgresses For if it was the master of ??? from the beginning ??? in reality he He said to him: Rabbi Chiyya son of Joseph (Lev. 22) ??? it is written ??? and Behold! ??? from the beginning ??? He said to him: lest No. We learned: except ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? which provides "Kedushah" ??? upon it on the master of ??? Rabbi Yochanan said to him: No. Have you heard this one for he said: R' ??? the master of ??? to join with the body of An altar of transgresses It is because of this: five desolations and if ??? also Six ??? That there are also Is this not ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? why is it that ??? in reality he He said to him: ??? Is this not ??? the validity ??? pieces of wood he the master of ??? from the beginning ??? the validity immediately ??? other than this He said to him even thus ??? the validity ??? there is not in this case. ??? No. ??? To exclude the master of ??? immediately That there are ??? Rabba said: now ??? The reason is ??? It is because of this: ??? even ??? for him ??? also ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Raba

דף ז,ב גמרא

??? shall you do ??? this my sanctity ??? the house And there is no meaning to the word for me except ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? It is possible Even if my sanctity An altar of Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 22) ??? No. ??? this my sanctity An altar of And there is no meaning to the word for me except ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? Rabbi says No. ??? is what the scripture says. we were a Tanna taught: that came first Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? that came first reasoned Even if ??? also ??? And Rabbi reasoned ??? but: for the value ??? No. ??? Learn from this So rather, that specific why do I have to account for that which was taught (Lev. 22) ??? shall you do that specific that specific shall you do ??? and if you makes ??? the house ??? And they said ??? the house transgresses a "Do this" i.e., a positive commandment And from where do we learn Even without shall you do as it is said (Lev. 22) And he said Hashem to Moses saying: ??? on the parasha (scriptural section) that it ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah He said to him Rabbi for there to be wheat ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? He said to him As it is written saying: It is not said regarding items among Rabbi They said: ??? say it was said: ??? to join with the body of An altar of Rabba said: transgresses It is because of this: ??? all of it but on account of ??? partially ??? yes. ??? on Is this not ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? to join with the body of An altar of transgresses It is because of this: five desolations ??? Abayye said: ??? The tanna teaches: If it was ??? transgresses ??? should bring himself except This is obvious! it is dealing with a case where there is only one. a person ??? Abayye said: ??? partially ??? the blood ??? blood to R' ??? Yehudah it has a Tanna that came first he does not have it is a problem ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah She But the beginning of the teaching, rabbis ??? -- This definitively refutes it!

דף ז,ב משנה

the priests. ??? and a Jew lit, Israel ??? yes. the priests. ??? No. the case is that of a sin-offering, and not ??? and not ??? Rabbi Yochanan ben Nuri said: On account of what yes. ??? He said to him: R' ??? A sin-offering and a guilt-offering gifts ??? gifts ??? Just as A sin-offering and a guilt-offering yes. ??? in it Even first-born yes. ??? in it Rabbi Yochanan ben Nuri said: Just as to him if he does not ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, and a guilt-offering that do not ??? of them ??? shall you say ??? in it ??? He said to him: Rabbi Akiva Does it not clearly ??? say (Lev. 27) and it was the case that he ??? it shall be ??? "Kedushah" ??? upon it in the house of ??? Even substitute offerings? in the house of the Ba'alim.

דף ז,ב גמרא

It was taught there: first-born we sell that specific perfect ??? and the master of ??? in it the his wife Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah They did not teach such a ruling except in these times (nowadays) Because it has ??? and there are ??? but: at a time i.e., in a case ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived immediately ??? he and it was standing we do not sell that specific ??? Raba for Rav, ??? we sell that specific ??? yes. ??? No. begins ??? Shall I say in these times (nowadays) who that it is possible perfect ??? except This is obvious! at a time i.e., in a case ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived And we have learned also we sell that specific ??? it has ??? No. In reality lit: In the world in these times (nowadays) who The tanna teaches: we sell that specific ??? yes. ??? No. this one Back to the main body of the text: he came ??? also we sell that specific ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.