It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ט,א גמרא

??? of high quality the written Torah

דף ט,א משנה

??? from ??? on the morning and from the morning on ??? and from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? from ??? on ??? from ??? on ??? as it is said (Lev. 27) No. ??? and not ??? that specific good ??? or evil" in the goodness of and Who is good ??? ???

דף ט,א גמרא

From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught (Lev. 27) livestock ??? from here ??? from ??? on the morning and from the morning on ??? from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? It is possible even Watch out for leading vav !! ??? ??? Scripture states: No. ??? and not ??? that specific good ??? or evil" in the goodness of and Who is good ??? ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Abayye said: let scripture say No. ??? and not ??? that specific good ??? or evil" in it in the goodness of other than this Why do I need Learn from this good ??? they shall make a substitution. evil" ??? yes. they shall make a substitution. Rava said: ??? good ??? If so, ??? he read No. ??? and not ??? that specific ??? or evil" in it why do I have ??? both of them. good one good Even if in the goodness of also For ??? And the other one good ??? they shall make a substitution. evil" ??? yes. they shall make a substitution. and Abaye said ??? he for just as good ??? from upon me for him ??? good in the goodness of and so when ??? is it not all the more so? ??? and Raba yes. ??? from justice. and Abaye said to you this one Is this not judgement he who ??? good ??? The rabbis taught: No. ??? others and not ??? that specific ??? himself to write No. ??? and it does not require No. ??? that specific If it was the writing of thus then I might incorrectly say: ??? -- this refers to and enter -- this refers to he ??? but: ??? them I would say No. ??? Come and hear from this This ??? others How so? If you were to say livestock ??? that are his and Those who are ill of the world who ??? (Lev. 27) a man For ??? his house and that which was sanctified for Temple use to Hashem the Merciful One in the Torah says Just as his house ??? Even all ??? So rather, livestock ??? of the world and Those who are ill that are his who ??? In the matter that is not are his In reality lit: In the world ??? of the world and Those who are ill that are his For example, he said: Master ??? all One who wishes ???

דף ט,א משנה

??? one with the passage of the requisite number of years and two on the first one in a case where there are one hundred hundred on the first Rabbi Shimon says: yes. ??? except one on the first as it is said (Lev. 27) and it was the case that he ??? it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use Just as he ??? Even She is isolated ???

דף ט,א גמרא

From where in Tanach do we know this? ??? livestock ??? from here ??? one ??? and two on the first one in a case where there are one hundred hundred on the first Rabbi Shimon says: yes. ??? except one on the first as it is said livestock ??? and not livestock ??? and not ??? He said to him: ??? livestock as it is said (Jonah 4) and livestock Rabbah and Rabbi Shimon livestock Rabbah ??? livestock ??? No. ??? and the reason ??? It is because of this: livestock he Hey, isn't it the case that The reason is ??? It is because of this: he Just as he ??? Even substitute offerings? is isolated ??? from the beginning He said to them: Rabbi Shimon from and it was the case that he ??? And so he saw ??? rabbis ??? He said to them: ??? from there also ??? The reason is ??? he said Reish Lakish: give thanks Rabbi Shimon ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא "Kedushah" the first ??? to where The halacha is And Rabbi Yochanan said: in the same way that do not ??? two on the first thus yes. ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rabbi Yochanan This teaching is consistent with the position ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rabbi Yochanan in the same way that do not ??? one with the passage of the requisite number of years thus in the same way yes. ??? This teaching is consistent with the position ??? It is possible in the same way ??? that do not ??? two on the first thus in the same way yes. ??? Scripture states: and it was the case that he ??? even in a case where there are one hundred he is required Rabbi Avin: according to the words of One who says yes. ??? a guilt-offering ??? in it ??? in it

דף ט,ב גמרא

??? on after ??? after ??? What then? ??? in it Abayye said: What then does it mean when it says ??? for him If it was two ??? "Kedushah" One ??? for him without ??? If it was two ??? one ??? for him without ??? and R' Avin: deriving a learning about one mishna from one mishna ??? for him and if ??? to say two ??? "Kedushah" One No. It is because of this: ??? "Kedushah" this one it was said: of it one ??? two ??? and two kiddushes What then? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. ??? other than this he is required R' Avin: to Rabbi Yochanan for he said: yes. ??? a guilt-offering ??? in it ??? in it ??? on after What then? ??? after ??? this ??? What then? ??? Abayye said: Which ??? for him "Kedushah" ??? No. ??? If it was ??? one ??? "Kedushah" No. ??? after And Rabbi Avin: deriving a learning about one mishna from one mishna ??? for him ??? on after What then? ??? who say ??? he ??? he returns ??? but: ??? one even though ??? it "Kedushah" he returns ??? or, perhaps, all ??? "Kedushah" yes. he returns ??? and if ??? to say justice. ??? one immediately ??? "Kedushah" ??? yes. he returns ??? except ??? after ??? this ??? What then? ??? in it who say For yes. ??? and he returns ??? What case is he dealing with? that specific ??? "Kedushah" but: that specific ??? he returns ??? or, perhaps, Even on "Kedushah" ??? immediately ??? he yes. he returns ??? R' Yehoshua ben Levi said: that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth And there is no meaning to the word that which was sanctified for Temple use two ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth Rav Pappa said: What is the reason? of Rabbi Joshua son of Levi said he read (Lev. 27) and if ??? his house ??? and not ??? he is required Rabbi Avin: ??? a guilt-offering ??? in it ??? upon it Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? his fellow ??? after ??? this ??? What then? ??? upon it Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth Abayye said: What then does it mean when it says ??? for him If it was two ??? "Kedushah" One ??? for him ??? for him without ??? If it was two kiddushes ??? one ??? for him ??? without ??? And Rabbi Avin: deriving a learning about one mishna from one mishna ??? for him if ??? to say two ??? "Kedushah" One No. It is because of this: ??? "Kedushah" ??? of it one ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth two ??? and two kiddushes What then does it mean when it says The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. ??? other than this he is required Rabbi Avin: ??? a guilt-offering ??? in it ??? on after ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? after ??? this ??? What then? ??? upon it Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth Abayye said: justice. ??? for him If it was "Kedushah" ??? for him No. ??? for him ??? If it was ??? one ??? "Kedushah" etc. ??? on after What then? ??? upon it Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth who ??? that came first he ??? but: ??? one even though ??? "Kedushah" ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.