It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יא,א משנה

the one who did of it ??? What is a maidservant all ??? a maidservant and half of it the daughter of ??? as it is said (Lev. 19) ??? No. ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah R' Yishmael says This is a maidservant for there is R' Eliezer son of Ya'akov says all ??? We do not have except half of it a maidservant and half of it the daughter of ???

דף יא,א גמרא

From where do we derive this? ??? This is only in the case No. ??? For the Rabbis taught (Lev. 19) ??? This teaches that it ??? It is possible ??? Therefore, scripture states: ??? She ??? This is only in the case he does not ??? And from where do we learn ??? he R' Yitzchak said shall be ??? As it is taught: The greatness ??? the written Torah two ??? the third says ??? Rav Ashi says ??? yes. ??? that specific except ??? The Rabbis taught at a time i.e., in a case ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man sends sacrifice yes. the his wife ??? yes. Watch out for leading vav "and the man sends sacrifice From where do we derive this? Rabba said: As it is written (Lev. 19) a man For ??? a woman emitting seed but it a maidservant ??? No. ??? or ??? it was not given to it ??? until Here in this case, ??? he read ??? and brought ??? to Hashem and in the end to write ??? why is it that Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and in the end the writing of and brought ??? to Hashem This is what he means: if ??? She and brought ??? to Hashem and if No. ??? No. ??? he ??? I would say he ??? he read but: She ??? sacrifice and brought ??? to Hashem it is written R' Yitzchak said In reality lit: In the world he is not liable except on a maidservant the case is that of an elevation-offering, only. as it is said but it a maidservant ??? and What is to be heard to support this reading? That this ??? it is written: (II Sam 17) ??? upon it ??? And if you wish, I could say (Prov. 27) if ??? in the midst of ??? (Ezra 10) ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? a ram ??? on ??? Rav Chisdah said This teaches ??? maidservants ??? Which are they a maidservant ??? The Rabbis taught ??? It is possible All of it Scripture states: No. ??? It is possible No. ??? Scripture states: ??? How so? ??? It is not ??? half of it a maidservant ??? the daughter of ??? to a slave ??? these are the words of Rabbi Akiva Rabbi Yishmael says ??? is what the scripture says. ??? to a slave ??? If so, Just as Scripture states: ??? No. ??? Torah ??? people R' Elazar ben Azarya says all ??? to us ??? to us half of it a maidservant and half of it the daughter of ??? to a slave ??? others say (Lev. 19) No. ??? For No. ??? is what the scripture says. ??? to a slave ??? to R' Yishmael This is satisfactory ??? No. ??? Torah ??? people Rather, that which was taught ??? to a slave ??? From where do we derive this? As it is written For No. ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? R' Elazar ben Azarya we were Rabbi Akiva to R' Yishmael he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: To me in reality like what you said he reasons for himself. ??? Torah ??? people and here in this other case, that I ??? it is written for him he read For No. ??? No. ??? Why do I need Learn from this ??? he came ??? a maidservant and half of it the daughter of ??? to others This is satisfactory ??? No. ??? his reasoning is ??? Torah ??? people but how do you reconcile that with this teaching ??? From where do we derive this? Scripture states: For No. ??? if he does not one topic ??? one topic for him

דף יא,א משנה

all ??? one The greatness and one a child a child is exempt one ??? and one sleeping sleeping is exempt one ??? and one ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, ???

דף יא,א גמרא

and here in this other case, he is liable a child R' Yehudah said: Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: all ??? one The greatness and one a child a child is exempt The greatness he is liable and here in this other case, The greatness also is exempt What is the reason מאי טעמא for it is the case that ??? all ??? one ??? and one sleeping sleeping is exempt here, sleeping also he is liable R' Yehudah said: Rav said Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: all ??? one ??? and one sleeping sleeping is exempt ??? he is liable here, even ??? is exempt What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? It was taught by a Tanna taught: in front of Rav ??? they make he completes ??? ??? He said to him What then does it mean when it says ??? If it was ??? betrothed The tanna teaches: why is it that they make he completes ??? he completes ??? betrothed ??? No. ??? And, too, ??? If it was ??? If it was No. No. ??? also ??? betrothed ??? or in the case that one is not ??? No. ??? What is the reason? (Lev. 19) emitting seed it is written And what does it mean when it says ??? and if in the remainder of ??? It was taught by they make he completes ???

דף יא,ב גמרא

??? It was necessary for him ??? He said to him ??? He said to him No. Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: they make he completes that did not have ??? betrothed that is not ??? (Lev. 19) ??? seed it is written ??? that did not have ??? seed it is written ??? that did not have ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? seed it is written Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found ??? in all ??? sleeping ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found ??? that did not have ???

דף יא,ב משנה

They said to him: Watch out for leading vav "And you shall eat milk sends A sin-offering until says he ate and until says No. he ate a woman she says he ate and the woman she says No. he ate sends a guilt-offering suspended until says he ate and he says No. ??? is exempt two say he ate and he says No. ??? Rabbi Meir he is obligated Thus said Rabbi ??? if ??? two to suffer lit, to the hands of death is stricter No. ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of sacrifice ??? They said to him: Just as if ??? to say ??? I was is exempt he ate milk and milk ??? One he is not liable except One he ate milk ??? an invalidating act nevertheless and notar ??? One he is liable on all One and one this ??? in great quantity ??? one ??? one ??? in great quantity ??? he ate ??? olive tree and he returned he ate ??? olive tree after ??? One ??? one he is liable ??? sectarians. is exempt

דף יא,ב גמרא

The tanna teaches: They said to him: Watch out for leading vav "And you shall eat milk sends A sin-offering And they said how much there shall be ??? This is only in the case Just as he said ??? and not ??? them except ??? he ??? A sin-offering on ??? No. I would say ??? until says he ate and he says No. ??? The reason is ??? for him but: ??? and how much more so two except ??? them with whom does it agree? ??? She for he said: ??? of the academy of two Is this not ??? She but: According to the sages, is exempt And what does it mean when it says Come and hear from this. from the end of the teaching: ??? Watch out for leading vav And hey, you can also come and hear from this. This item It is a disagreement ??? And the rabbbis This is only in the case ??? them that it is possible that they said They said to him: also one a seminal emission for him For it was taught in a baraita the his wife ??? the sea ??? And they said to her did he die ??? and after this came ??? from this and from this ??? that even it is dealing with a case where there is only one. From where can you derive When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, ??? that did not have ??? it is permitted. ??? to him What then does it mean when it says that did not have ??? that did not have ??? a court ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching ??? a court בית דין ??? one Perhaps, regarding a single witness The tanna teaches: And they said and Here in this case, also, where he teaches They said to him: ??? even a single witness This is only in the case What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? that he came ??? for him who ??? Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: ??? a single witness says he ate and he says No. ??? is exempt except ??? Learn from this a single witness says etc. The reason is that he came ??? for him but: ??? he is liable In reality lit: In the world that is not ??? for him And this is what the tanna means to teach: They said to him: Watch out for leading vav "And you shall eat milk sends A sin-offering Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? but: ??? for him is exempt and according to Torah law, From where do we derive this? that is not ??? for him he is liable ??? (Lev. 4) or ??? and not ??? others It is possible even yes. ??? Therefore, scripture states: or ??? from all a place with what are we dealing? ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? he read he is required

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.