It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טו,א גמרא

it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it and the daughter of ??? and after this ??? ??? ??? says It is because of this: Rabbi Meir ??? Rabba said: Perhaps No. She Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Yochanan son of ??? Here in this case, except It is because of this: desolations ??? if ??? if ??? but: regarding that specific and his son ??? that specific and his son ??? desolations ??? did not say Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak Perhaps Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: ??? except regarding that specific and his son ??? But here, in this case, ??? I would say ??? that R' Yochanan said he reasons, for thus said Rabbi ??? that R' Yochanan said (Lev. 18) ??? there are ??? She the scripture ??? for all of them ??? One

דף טו,א משנה

he said Rabbi Akiva ??? Rabban Gamliel and R' Yehoshua ??? of ??? that they went ??? livestock ??? his son of Rabban Gamliel that comes on ??? and on ??? his father and on ??? of its mother What then? he is liable One on all of them or he is liable on all One and one They said to him: No. ??? but: ??? that comes on Hashem ??? One that he was he is liable on all One and one ??? is a kal vachomer

דף טו,א גמרא

How so? Shall I say ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him Behold! desolations ??? Behold! ??? except Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: that comes on ??? his father that it ??? of its mother he is liable One on all of them or he is liable on all One and one What then? who say Behold! desolations ??? or, perhaps, Behold! yes. ??? They said to him: No. ??? but: ??? that comes on Hashem ??? "At the same time," that he was in that place one ??? on all One and one It is because of this: a menstruant ??? is a kal vachomer for just as that comes on Hashem ??? "At the same time," that it in that place One he is liable on all One and one ??? that it ??? his father that it ??? of its mother that are three desolations is it not logical that it should be he is liable on all One and one that it is possible ??? Just as to Hashem ??? which provides ??? except Scripture states: (Lev. 20) ??? on ??? that it ??? his father that it ??? of its mother Rav Adda bar Ahava said It concerns itself ??? son of ??? who has sex with of its mother ??? two the daughters of and he returned came on One from them ??? son of came his son on ??? of its mother that it ??? that it ??? his father that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? son of ??? The Rabbis taught came upon it and he returned came upon it and he returned came upon it he is liable on all One and one --- these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer. But the sages say: he is not liable except One "We thank..." the sages to R' Eliezer ??? on Hashem ??? "At the same time," that he was he is liable on all One and one Because This is only in the case ??? to them Rabba said: for Rav, ??? who say Because This is only in the case ??? to them For it was taught: he ??? One but it in Hashem. ??? he he is not liable except One but it ??? on all One and one except I would say Because ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? What do I have to learn from he said Rabbi Eliezer The reason is of Rabbi Eliezer there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? he said he is liable on all One and one So, here, ??? or, perhaps, his reason of Rabbi Eliezer there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: For if it was ??? to him ??? -- this refers to ??? Thus said Rabbi Eliezer he is liable on all One and one but: ??? and he returned ??? One immediately where it is possible to him ??? two ??? "At the same time," he is not liable except One What then does it mean when it says Rabbah said The reason is ??? there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? both So, here, this one a slave both and Rav Yosef said: The reason is of Rabbi Eliezer there i.e., in another mishna For if it was ??? to him ??? but: ??? to him ??? he is not liable except One ??? Abaye ??? R' Eliezer he is obligated on ??? in a place root categories of forbidden labor on Shabbat this one ??? "At the same time," is exempt And if you say The reason is of Rabbi Eliezer It is because of this: ??? both why is it that is exempt Mar said: the son of is a law established by the Rabbis I Rav ??? son of ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? atop ??? "At the same time," It is because of this: thus he is obligated Rabbi Eliezer Because desolations ??? in what way does It concerns itself ??? For example, ??? two ??? "At the same time," but: ??? and he returned ??? he is liable

דף טו,א משנה

And furthermore, He asked Rabbi Akiva ??? What then? They said to him: No. ??? but: ??? that he was tahor thus in the same way they were

דף טו,ב משנה

??? doing in Jerusalem Watch out for leading vav And he would walk... continued on next daf evening Passover next to ??? until ??? in it ??? from him ??? makes ??? makes ??? is a kal vachomer

דף טו,ב גמרא

It was taught there: the erasing ??? crying ??? from him Behold! there are. crying ??? Shmuel said ??? herself ??? What is the reason? in the hour of ??? from him ??? For it was taught in a mishna: evening Passover Watch out for leading vav And he would walk... continued on next daf next to etc. And if you say in the hour of ??? Watch out for leading vav And this is present here. also This certain individual ??? in the hour of ??? to a person ??? Rav Yosef ??? in all ??? Here in this case, also, ??? in all ??? in a case it was said: of Rav Yosef to this other teaching One suffering from gonorrhea and tamei did he die that were ??? and they descend upon them the rains despite the fact ??? this ??? that do not "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." except that were taken out from the Courtyard ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? Behold! validate it ??? except after that were taken out from the Courtyard ??? Rav Yosef said ??? in all ???

דף טו,ב משנה

And furthermore, They asked R' ??? Hashem offerings? outside ??? One What then? he is liable on all One and one or One on all of them They said to him: No. ??? Rabbi Yehoshua said: I hear ??? An altar of one from Hashem" ??? One that he was he is liable on all One and one It is because of this: the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? I ??? is a kal vachomer he said Rabbi Shimon No. thus in the same way They asked R' ??? except ??? notar ??? offerings? ??? One What then? he is liable One on all of them or he is liable on all One and one They said to him: No. ??? R' Yehoshua said: I hear ??? An altar of one in Hashem. ??? One that he was he is liable on all One and one It is because of this: the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? I ??? is a kal vachomer He said to him: R' ??? if The halacha is ??? if ??? there are a response He said to him: ??? he said and not if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? the one who did of it ??? and ??? ??? to invite is greater than shall you say ??? in which is not One ???

דף טו,ב גמרא

What then does it mean when it says has a problem ??? thus ??? has a problem Just as proof ??? Just as ??? which provides benefit except thus in the same way They asked One who eats notar ??? offerings? ??? One What then? he is liable in all One and one or One on all of them They said to him: No. ??? he said R' Yehoshua I hear ??? An altar of one ??? One ??? on all One and one It is because of this: the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? I ??? is a kal vachomer Just as An altar of one that do not ??? he is liable on all One and one It is because of this: ??? five offerings? ??? is it not all the more so? he said R' Shimon No. thus in the same way They asked except ??? notar ??? offerings? ??? One What then? he is liable One on all of them or he is liable on all One and one They said to him: No. ??? Rabbi Yehoshua says: I hear ??? An altar of one in five ??? that he was he is liable on all One and one It is because of this: the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? I ??? He said to him: R' ??? if The halacha is ??? Rabbi Yehoshua about this teaching a response ??? or No. Come and hear: as it is taught: he ate Hashem cuts notar An altar of one ??? One in five ??? he does not sends except A sin-offering One and on No. ??? that are theirs he does not sends except a guilt-offering suspended One ??? sends A sin-offering on all One and one and on No. ??? that are theirs sends a guilt-offering suspended on all One and one from Hashem" offerings? ??? One he is liable ??? all One ??? R' Yosi ??? Yehudah says even he ate Hashem cuts from Hashem" offerings? ??? One he does not sends except A sin-offering One and on ??? yes. sends except a guilt-offering suspended One "The general principle of the thing is that all ??? he ate Hashem cuts in Hashem. ??? An altar of one before the sprinkling of blood: Even if ??? One he is liable on all One and one It is because of this: the laws of misappropriation of sacred things

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.