It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טז,א גמרא

And even on ??? sends a guilt-offering suspended No. The tanna teaches: with whom does it agree? this one Shall I say Rabbi Akiva Let the Tanna teach: also at the end of the teaching, and on ??? sends a guilt-offering suspended ??? Rabbi Akiva he is obligated on doubt whether the laws of misappropriation of sacred things a guilt-offering suspended except Is this not Rabbi Yehoshua She And we have learned in Hashem. ??? sends Hashem sin-offerings so learn from this he accepted it from him. except ??? from the end of the teaching: where he teaches from Hashem" offerings? even ??? One he is liable on all One and one Learn from this No. he accepted it from him. and Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to say ??? She That there are a Tanna taught: ??? and there are a Tanna taught: that is not ??? Even if you say Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva and that one a Tanna taught: derive it ??? upon it ??? derive it ??? upon it ??? How so? How should we understand this? Hashem misappropriations of sanctified items Shmuel said ??? that we have learned five items the case is that of an elevation-offering, combine together ??? and the wine ??? and the oil Hezekiyah said: For example, who ate from Hashem" Abraham Reish Lakish: he said even you say ??? one It concerns itself ??? Rabbi Isaac ??? he said For example, who ate in Hashem. varieties of ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: For example, who ate in Hashem. ???

דף טז,א משנה

R' Akiva said ??? Rabbi Eliezer ??? in great quantity ??? in great quantity a summary of work One ??? One What then? he is liable One on all of them or he is liable on all One and one He said to him: he is liable on all One and one From a "kal vachomer", for just as a menstruant where there is not in it the ways of going out" in great quantity and sin-offerings in great quantity he is liable on all One and one Sabbath in which there is the ways of going out" in great quantity ??? in great quantity is it not logical that it should be he is liable on all One and one I said to him: if is what you say? Do you really mean that? of niddah in which there is two ??? that he was ??? on ??? upon it shall you say on Shabbat where there is not in it except ??? One He said to me: that comes on ??? He corrects where there is not in it except ??? One he is liable on all One and one I said to him: if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? by the mouth of that do not have in them now there are of them after time shall you say on Shabbat where there is not in it now and not after time He said to me: that comes on ??? He corrects I said to him: ??? like Shabbat

דף טז,א גמרא

What then does it mean when it says ??? of him If it was ??? and if it does not require of him ??? One who makes work One ??? in great quantity except ??? If it was ??? and if it does not require of him ??? of him One who makes ??? in great quantity a summary of work One on Shabbat Rabba said: They said: among Rav both ??? brought this very question and if No. ??? brought this very question If it was No. ??? in what way does should bring himself ??? Sabbath ??? This is obvious to him. ??? there shall be ??? Sabbath ??? he who seeks of him If it was ??? If it was No. or, perhaps, ??? Sabbath ??? This is obvious to him. ??? Sabbath ??? he who seeks of him ??? If it was there shall be ??? If it was did not say Rabbah

דף טז,ב גמרא

??? Sabbath ??? This is obvious to him. ??? there shall be ??? Sabbath ??? he who seeks of him ??? or Is this not ??? for him ??? Sabbath ??? and not he has accepted of him ??? for him ??? and not he has accepted of him Rabbah said ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita A general principle: The greatness And they said on Shabbat all ??? the essence Sabbath One who acts ??? in great quantity ??? in great quantity he is not liable except One ??? the essence Sabbath One who acts ??? in great quantity ??? in great quantity he is liable on all Sabbath Sabbath ??? that he was Sabbath One who acts ??? in great quantity ??? in great quantity he is liable on all ??? work and work And even he is liable on all ??? work of all Sabbath Sabbath No. The tanna teaches: with whom does it agree? this one Shall I say ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, One who makes ??? in great quantity a summary of work One He is not liable except One and if ??? he is liable on all ??? except This is obvious! Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva so learn from this ??? Sabbath ??? This is obvious to him. ??? there shall be ??? Sabbath ??? he who seeks If it was ??? for him ??? both of them. No. he has accepted of him Abaye said to him: In reality lit: In the world I would say to you ??? Sabbath ??? This is obvious to him. Rabbi Akivah ??? Is this not ??? Sabbath ??? he who seeks of him ??? who there shall be ??? or No. ??? for him ??? and he has accepted of him ??? for him ??? and not he has accepted of him Rav Chisda he said ??? Sabbath ??? even Rabbi Akiva he reasons, ??? And so he is required of him ??? Sabbath ??? he who seeks of him ??? If it was there shall be ??? for him days ??? there shall be ??? and he has accepted of him ??? for him ??? and not he has accepted of him Rav Chisdah said ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: the writing two letters ??? One he is liable ??? Rabban Gamliel he is obligated and the sages ??? give thanks Rabban Gamliel ??? the writing of ??? One on Shabbat -- this refers to ??? One on Shabbat ??? is exempt and it was taught: ??? the writing two letters ??? the first day in the week -- this refers to and the first day in the week -- this refers to Rabban Gamliel he is obligated and the sages ??? You might have thought ??? like Rabbi Akiva. he reasons for himself. This is satisfactory To me ??? Sabbath ??? even Rabbi Akiva says: ??? this one that teaches is exempt ??? Sabbath ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.