It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כ,א גמרא

He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Oshaya: Rabbi Shimon ??? and Rabbi Shimon say No. ??? on a thing that he was From here one that he was he is liable except ??? Just as ??? on a thing that he was It is because of this: two desolations for Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated A sin-offering and Rabbi Yehoshua exempts And Rabbi Yehudah What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? grapes ??? figs ??? grapes and figs ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? two desolations we were Rabbi Shimon and Rabbi Shimon ??? Rabbi Yehudah What then does it mean when it says he came ??? except Is this not ??? There is this difference between them: of Rabbi Yehudah reasoned ??? he is liable ??? and Rabbi Shimon ??? reason that ??? is exempt No. ??? the words of all are is exempt and here in this other case, In this case, ??? of Rabbi Shimon ??? reasoned forgot ??? at the Name one the words of all are he is liable Because specifically, where they disagree is this: with two desolations R' Yehudah reasoned there is no difference at the Name one and there is no difference with two desolations ??? Rava said: ??? There is this difference between them: For it was taught: they were before him two lamps ??? -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to is exempt ??? One he is liable ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? No. ??? for it is the case that ??? from the beginning he is required and in the end ??? And so a slave It once happened ??? and in the rear of ??? he and so go ahead and say is exempt Come and hear from this ??? No. arise behind also No. based on this lit: from after, The rabbis taught: ??? on Shabbat he is liable A sin-offering Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer ??? he is liable two because it was act of extinguishing ??? ??? with what are we dealing? If it was that he came ??? What is the reason? ??? except that is not ??? What is the reason? ??? both Rabbi Eliezer And Rabbi ??? that they said ??? For example, ??? so that ??? ??? that came first his reasoning is ??? is exempt and Rabbi Eliezer ??? he said he is liable and thus Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: Up to this point, No. ??? The reason is of The halacha is -- this refers to Ami son of Avin: Rav ??? son of Avin: that they said ???

דף כ,ב גמרא

For example, ??? that came first derive it like R' Yosi for he said: ??? was it taken out and R' Eliezer ??? derive it like Rabbi he gave for he said: ??? was it taken out Rava said: to precede There is this difference between them: Rav Ashi said: For example, ??? and it was taught that came first derive it like Rabbi Shimon for he said: a thing that do not ??? is exempt and Rabbi Eliezer ??? derive it like Rabbi Yehudah for he said: a thing that do not ??? he is liable The rabbis taught: ??? on Shabbat ??? at them." ??? One teaching he is liable It was taught by Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one is exempt ??? he is liable his reasoning is work that is not it requires ??? he is liable upon it Hey, isn't it the case that ??? is exempt his reasoning is work that is not it requires ??? is exempt upon it

דף כ,ב משנה

he ate blood ??? between ??? between ??? blood ??? blood ??? blood ??? in it we are guilty on its account blood ??? blood the heart blood ??? blood locusts blood ??? we are not guilty on its account Rabbi Yehudah he is obligated with blood ???

דף כ,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Lev. 7) all blood No. ??? listen I Even if blood ??? two blood ??? blood locusts blood fish The entirety are in the general category Scripture states: (Lev. 7) ??? and to a domesticated animal Just as "uf" and livestock ??? in which there is of them ??? lightweight ??? is stricter and there are of them prohibits and permission there are. ??? meat Even all in which there is of them ??? lightweight ??? blood ??? two in which there is of them ??? is stricter And there is no meaning to the word at them." ??? lightweight

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.