It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כא,א גמרא

??? blood ??? that do not at them." ??? is stricter ??? blood ??? that do not ??? meat blood fish blood locusts ??? permission (Lev. 7) ??? and to a domesticated animal If it was Just as "uf" where there is not in it ??? Even livestock where there is not in it ??? Scripture states: and to a domesticated animal If it was Just as livestock that is not ??? on ??? Even "uf" that is not ??? on ??? Therefore, scripture states: ??? and to a domesticated animal and so go ahead and say all blood A general principle: "uf" and livestock creates an exclusion A general principle: and creates an exclusion yes. are in the general category except Just as ??? "uf" and livestock yes. something other than this No. (Lev. 7) ??? who It may be eaten all blood and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Hey, isn't it the case that No. he is equivalent. ??? that was last ??? that came first ??? that came first Is this not ??? that was last he is spiritually cut off This a Tanna taught: of the academy of R' Yishmael ??? from justice. ??? Even though it will be that is not he is equivalent. ??? that was last ??? that came first Mar said: A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? a thing in which there is in it ??? lightweight ??? is stricter and there is prohibits and permission and there are of them ??? meat Even any thing in which there is in it ??? lightweight ??? is stricter and etc. Even all where he teaches ??? What then does it mean when it says Rav said ??? son of Avin: to include ??? of ??? What then is the reasoning of If his reasoning is ??? doubt he It is necessary to teach this he read ??? doubt except his reasoning is ??? the son of alone by itself he ??? From where do we derive this? (Lev. 7) from all milk ??? From where do we derive this? (Deut. 12) from all ??? From where do we derive this? (Gen. 32) ??? the Merciful One Hey, isn't it the case that it has ??? From where do we derive this? reason out the logic. ??? words ??? the Merciful One ??? also ??? Mar said: ??? blood ??? two in which there is of them ??? is stricter and They do not have ??? lightweight We challenge that from the following baraita ??? from a person It is necessary for him ??? it is a problem to us ??? why do I have shall you do ??? are his ??? Is this not ??? She and not For it was taught in a mishna: A general principle: And they said ??? all ??? to eat a person tamei until ??? This certain individual ??? of him ??? originally it was. Look, to a person ??? from tumah until ??? Here in this case, ??? for him ??? If it was Look, to a person Look, ??? If it was No. Look, to a person No. Look, ??? In any case, The tanna teaches: ??? lightweight She that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: after death tamei he ??? is stricter ??? regarding livestock after death If it was meat become tamei ??? is stricter and if blood become tamei ??? is stricter For it was taught in a baraita blood ??? the academy of Shammai ??? and the academy of Hillel impart tumah No. ??? except ??? livestock that is tamei in any place ??? "uf" ??? It is necessary for him ??? and it is not necessary ??? livestock that is tahor in any place ??? "uf" tahor and milk ??? It is not necessary for them No. ??? and not ??? And he said to him: Rav to Rabbi Chiyya ??? why do I have ??? lightweight She ??? She He said to him For example, That there are less than an olive's volume roadkill ??? the quantity of an egg they eat That this and that one you shall an egg's volume If so, that also should request ??? for it is the case that a Tanna taught: of the academy of R' Yishmael (Lev. 11) on all seed ??? who ??? Just as ??? that do not ??? is stricter and it is necessary ??? Even all that do not ??? is stricter It is necessary for him ??? He said to him that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? of the world ??? in it less than an olive's volume ??? But here, in this case, That there are ??? less than an olive's volume roadkill immediately For this ??? for him an olive's volume it does not require ???

דף כא,ב גמרא

To exclude did he die Even though it will be ??? for him No. become tamei ??? they eat It is because of this: ??? next to every person Rav ??? he said even you say that there is an olive's volume Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? also ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? that is not ??? No. ??? and not by being carried But here, in this case, ??? that is not become tamei ??? by being carried Regardless, ??? for it is the case that required for him To exclude did he die that even for the sake of ??? become tamei ??? is stricter ??? and ascend ??? Master, they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? that do not have in them ??? and not ??? become tamei ??? by being carried No. ??? Mar said: he took out the blood fish ??? locusts ??? permission What then does it mean when it says all of it permission Shall I say ??? is permitted. Behold! raw lit., living ??? is permitted. And its blood is forbidden So rather, It is because of this: ??? in them? prohibits ??? Consider this case: "uf" ??? of him. prohibits ??? is forbidden Rather, what can we conclude? all of it permission that is not he is required ??? Mar said: Just as "uf" in which is not ??? Even livestock Therefore, scripture states: livestock ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed Shall I say ??? For it was taught in a mishna: raw lit., living and "uf" is subject to the same laws as them ??? except Abayye said: ??? we are not guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said blood ??? upon it in the amount like an olive They challenged him from this teaching: blood ??? blood the heart blood ??? blood Abraham Behold! these without shall you do blood ??? two blood ??? is forbidden but we do not become guilty on its account What then does it mean when it says we are not guilty on its account he is spiritually cut off ??? he is obligated one ??? But the beginning of the teaching, And furthermore, a Tanna taught: ??? also ??? for him where he teaches he took out the blood ??? that do not have in them ??? is stricter Rabbi Zeira said ??? in it It is because of this: ??? It is because of this: blood he does not ??? Rav said blood fish ??? is forbidden They challenged him from this teaching: blood fish blood locusts is permitted. and even initially this particular ??? For ??? Rav said ??? regarding ??? two ??? who is forbidden and this was taught! blood for upon regarding a loaf ??? of between ??? and does not ??? except For this teaching ??? that there is in it: ??? and thus he comes to say Rav is forbidden ??? of him. ??? Rav Sheshet said blood ??? two even the commandments ??? yes. in it They challenged him from this teaching: blood ??? blood the heart blood ??? blood Abraham Behold! these without shall you do blood ??? two blood ??? is forbidden and He is not liable upon it For It was taught: is forbidden

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.