It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כב,א גמרא

??? and thus he comes to say Rav that it was not the case that ??? As it is taught: blood for upon regarding a loaf ??? of between ??? consume. and does not ??? there is someone who teaches this as referring about this teaching of Rav ??? on ??? as it is taught: It is possible milk ??? two ??? he transgresses a "Thou shalt not" i.e., a negative commandment It would be a logical inference Just as livestock that is tamei ??? two ??? is it not logical ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 11) and this to you ??? this tamei And there is no meaning to the word milk ??? two tamei except tahor ??? ??? that do not the value of in all and not ??? the blood ??? in all Scripture states: and this to you ??? this tamei And there is no meaning to the word blood ??? two tamei except tahor ??? Rav Sheishet even the commandments ??? yes. in it It was taught there: the heart ??? and sends forth ??? No. ??? he does not transgresses upon it R' Zayra said: Rav said They did not teach this לא שנו except Watch out for leading vav "And in the hearts of "uf" Because And there is no meaning to the word in it an olive's volume but: heart livestock ??? in it an olive's volume is forbidden but we become liable to excision on its account. They challenged him from this teaching: blood ??? blood the heart blood ??? blood Abraham Behold! these without shall you do blood ??? two blood ??? is forbidden but we do not become guilty on its account And this is what the tanna means to teach: we are not guilty on its account on blood ??? and thus he comes to say Rav ??? for him ??? blood ??? we were blood Abraham ??? who No. The tanna teaches: blood ??? And we have learned blood Abraham except It was taught by and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had It was taught by So, here, It was taught by and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had It was taught by ??? will come for him R' Zayra said: at the hour ??? blood ??? in it they are obligated ??? it was said: Who is blood ??? that is hanging in it Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: The whole time ??? Reish Lakish: he said ??? They challenged him from this teaching: Who is blood ??? in it The whole time ??? he took out the blood ??? because it was ??? Is this not even ??? and the last ??? he ??? he is equivalent. ??? No. ??? blood ??? but if the blood went out ??? and the last Even though it will be ??? we were blood ??? They challenged him from this teaching: Who is blood ??? The whole time ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? and the last because it was ??? He could say to you ??? She as it is taught: Who is blood ??? The whole time ??? these are the words of ??? Rabbi Shimon says: ??? It was taught in the academy of Rabbi Yishmael, (Num. 23) ??? creates an exclusion ??? that is not considers it proper ??? R' brought this very question ??? Zeira ??? blood to a domesticated animal ??? of its blood with two ??? What then? on ??? the words of all are he is liable on ??? who ??? or No. He said to him ??? of R' Yochanan and Reish Lakish: ??? blood to a domesticated animal ??? of its blood with two ??? Reish Lakish: he said he is liable two sin-offerings And Rabbi Yochanan said: he is not liable except ??? Rabbi Yehudah he is obligated with blood ??? R' Elazar said give thanks R' Yehudah in the matter of atonement as it is said (Lev. 17) For the blood he ??? blood ??? in it atones and those that do not ??? in it he does not atones he said ??? son of Isaac Even We also ??? as it is taught: blood Just as Scripture states: (Lev. 17) all blood on account of as it is said For the blood he ??? yes. for me except blood holy offerings ??? in it that he was atones blood Those who are ill ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: all blood ??? with whom does it agree? it is R' Yehudah

דף כב,א משנה

Rabbi Akiva he is obligated on doubt whether the laws of misappropriation of sacred things a guilt-offering suspended and the sages ??? give thanks R' ??? that is not sends ??? until ??? to him ??? with it a guilt-offering certainly R' Tarfon said Just as to this sends two guilt-offerings except sends the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? a guilt-offering with two ??? and he said if certainly ??? -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to ??? and if doubt whether ??? and a guilt-offering suspended ??? that he was sends on ??? sends on No. ??? he said Rabbi Akiva can be seen his words ??? Behold! ??? doubt whether the laws of misappropriation of sacred things in a case where there are one hundred a maneh worth one hundred dinars No. proper to him ??? a guilt-offering ??? and not ??? doubt whether the laws of misappropriation of sacred things in a case where there are one hundred a maneh worth one hundred dinars give thanks Rabbi Akiva to R' ???

דף כב,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Lev. 5) and if ??? on doubt whether misappropriations of sanctified items a guilt-offering suspended these are the words of R' ??? and the sages ??? Let us say, In this case, ??? For R' ??? reasoned ??? on high." ??? And the rabbbis reason that yes. ??? on high." ??? Rav Pappa said: everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? on high." ??? thus north ??? mornings No. ??? them except Here in this case, we were The reason is is a law established by the Rabbis ??? the commandments the commandments ??? Just as there a thing ??? on One who intentionally violates it he is spiritually cut off and on ??? A sin-offering ??? a guilt-offering ??? Even all ??? on One who intentionally violates it he is spiritually cut off and on ??? A sin-offering and on ??? a guilt-offering suspended To exclude the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? they are obligated on One who intentionally violates it he is spiritually cut off as it is taught: ??? Rabbi says ??? But the sages say: ??? and R' ??? reasoned For ??? the commandments the commandments ??? milk ??? he ??? Just as there ??? Even here, ??? To exclude an elevation-offering and descends that is not And the rabbbis reason that yes. ??? the value of ??? from this general principle it would follow For R' ??? reasoned there are ??? the value of ??? except everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world yes. ??? the value of ??? except we were The reason is ??? For scripture said: and if ??? on one topic ??? on high." ??? And the rabbbis reason that ??? he ??? By means of money ??? and Rabbi Akiva reasoned yes. ??? from this general principle it would follow is a law established by the Rabbis reason that there are ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? to us ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world yes. ??? and here in this other case, ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? the commandments the commandments ??? and Rabbi Akiva a guilt-offering By means of money ??? for him (Lev. 7) ??? Torah One for all ??? And the rabbbis even though As it is written this ??? It is necessary to teach this ??? and if ??? on one topic ??? and if ??? then I might incorrectly say: For I thought to say Torah One for all guilt-offerings What case is he dealing with? in the remainder of guilt-offerings ??? but: a guilt-offering suspended immediately ??? doubt whether milk ??? I would say No. ??? a donkey ??? Just as ??? A sin-offering the daughter of ??? Even ??? a guilt-offering son of ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: and if ??? on one topic ??? this one it's settled. for one who derives an explanation from this ??? except for one that is not he expounds. this ??? What is there to say? he learns it ??? the laws of misappropriation of sacred things a guilt-offering a maidservant betrothed it is not written: of it ??? give thanks Rabbi Akiva ??? and if doubt whether What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rabba said: It was taught by if ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? a guilt-offering suspended ??? on ??? on that did not have ??? the end of the end of For ??? for him he is required ??? a guilt-offering certainly Rabba said: in words of both ??? a guilt-offering certainly it does not require ??? initially

דף כב,ב משנה

the his wife ??? A sin-offering of a bird: ??? before it was even the case that Once its neck has been wrung ??? to it ??? certainly ??? certainly ??? that it ??? on ??? on No. ??? of Those who are ill ??? of that which was sanctified for Temple use he ate One from them And there is no meaning to the word know whichever from them he ate is exempt Rabbi Akiva he is obligated a guilt-offering suspended he ate ??? sends a guilt-offering certainly he ate one ??? and someone else came he ate ??? this sends a guilt-offering suspended and this sends a guilt-offering suspended these are the words of Rabbi Akiva Rabbi Shimon says: ??? bring in a guilt-offering one R' Yosei says

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.