It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כד,א גמרא

??? two guilt-offerings each of them as backups for the other ??? in one from them ??? until ??? "and he sold ??? What is the reason? ??? does not disagree ??? is a law established by the Rabbis except It is because of this: that is not ??? knocks at him But here, in this case, ??? one he ??? for him ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? two ??? If it was ??? one ??? And because of the fact ??? knocks at him he was Because thus in the same way he was ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said "We thank..." the sages According to Rabbi Meir, ??? suspended ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא Up to this point, does not disagree rabbis upon it except in a case ??? himself say his heart knocks at him but: in a case ??? witnesses ??? It was not immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? Perhaps they came others ??? them He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba ox ??? is not thus if before it was even the case that ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say ??? among two They said: ??? among two They said: No. ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? them ??? except Is this not ??? regarding a guilt-offering suspended ??? He said to him Abaye and Perhaps ox ??? How so? How should we understand this? For example, ??? came regarding a guilt-offering suspended For example, ??? but: in a case ??? suspended ??? witnesses No. ??? a guilt-offering suspended ??? Rabbi Eliezer says Behold! She ??? as it is taught: ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? until ??? "and he sold ??? and Rabbi Yochanan ??? No. he is equivalent. Minchah-offering of ??? No. ??? except ??? iniquity but: a guilt-offering suspended ??? will come from the midst of that his heart knocks at him he completes ??? he said Rabbi ??? R' Yochanan said: ox ??? all ??? in it took possession in it Rabba said: ??? The reason is of Rabbi Yochanan For example, that they said for him ??? instead, they said ??? he about himself. ??? that is not ??? and not ??? for him ??? witnesses and what is the difference here, ??? for he said: Rabbah son of will come he said Reish Lakish: a city ??? all ??? of it took possession of it a city ??? for many people ??? all One says ??? I No. ??? other than this Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? But here, in this case, ??? hangs the validity he about himself. ??? know that is not ??? and not ??? for him ??? witnesses he said Reish Lakish: who gives gifts to his fellow and he said ??? If it was ??? of it all ??? of it took possession of it and What is the difference ??? for he said: Rabbah son of Avuah Rav Sheshet said And there are those who say it was R' Abahu said Rav Sheshet said he accepts gifts who said after ??? gifts ??? gifts -- this refers to ??? If it was ??? of it his words ??? It is not gifts did not say anything

דף כד,ב גמרא

Is this not his words ??? No. his words ??? This is only in the case also No. ??? to it and all ??? of it took possession of it They challenged him from this teaching: One who says to his fellow judgement items yes. for me on this field yes. for me ??? of it and the hands of ??? did not say anything Hey, isn't it the case that the hands of ??? he is equivalent. And we have learned did not say anything It is different there in that case for he said: For ??? items ??? No. ??? They challenged him from this teaching: the writing ??? to others they were of them slaves and he said ??? If it was ??? of them if he was his rabbi; two a priest they eat from terumah Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says immediately who said If it was ??? of them Already ??? of them ??? This is satisfactory ??? his reasoning is For he will give ??? gifts with the intent ??? to it of him For No. ??? to it of him ??? except ??? If it was For he said If it was ??? of them all ??? of them took possession of them Here in this case, for he said: two If it was ??? of them are they, them ??? terumah his reasoning is ??? his male slave he has fulfilled his obligation ??? and it is necessary writ ??? but his thought is ??? he eats ??? R' Eliezer says: ??? Why do I need Watch out for leading vav he sinned this one Thus said Rabbi Eliezer a guilt-offering suspended ??? will come For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Eliezer says ??? a person a guilt-offering suspended in all day Rav Ashi said ??? to him he For it was taught in a baraita except say to him Wait until ??? if ??? The tanna teaches: ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? Perhaps, Those who are ill ??? in the courtyard ??? We challenge that from the following baraita a guilt-offering certainly is not thus if before it was even the case that ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? behold! This is הרי זה ??? R' Elazar said ??? who ??? -- this refers to No. year" -- this refers to Rabbah said a guilt-offering certainly on a guilt-offering suspended ??? a guilt-offering certainly immediately that is not It is necessary for him for him No. ??? for him a guilt-offering suspended from the midst of that his heart knocks at him he completes ??? except If it was it is a problem a guilt-offering certainly on a guilt-offering certainly it is a problem where he teaches behold! This is הרי זה ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? this one certainly ??? who ??? -- this refers to No. year" -- this refers to Rav Ashi said: ??? where he teaches ??? suspended ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? No. ??? It is because of this: ??? the blood ??? But why? this one ??? for him ??? Rabba said: Scripture states: (Lev. 5) This is only in the case No. know ??? to him Hey, isn't it the case that did not occur for him ??? in the hour of ??? Rabbi Yosei says: even the blood ??? to R' ??? why is it that ??? this one ??? for him ??? in the hour of ??? Rabba said: R' Yosi derive it like Rabbi Shimon for he said: all ??? he is equivalent. I will say for he said: Rabbi Shimon ??? but: This yes. ??? In the west, they said his reasoning is R' Yosi implements of ??? in it ??? at the beginning ??? a guilt-offering certainly is not thus ??? it was said: wagon ??? when does the previous statement apply? ??? av Hamnunah he said ??? Rava said: after ??? This is satisfactory to Raba ??? of it It once happened except for Rav, ??? From when

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.