It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כז,א גמרא

at the end of the teaching, a seminal emission for him ??? a ram a guilt-offering But the beginning of the teaching, that he has i.e., that he is expected a ram ??? the principal amount ??? for him ??? at the end of the teaching, that is not you shall a ram ??? the principal amount plus a fifth a seminal emission for him a ram a guilt-offering ??? a sela coin ??? he is required Rav ??? son of ??? What then? ??? who say if ??? to say a person ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use It is because of this: ??? in front But here, in this case, that is not ??? No. ??? or, perhaps, if ??? to say yes. a person ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use It is because of this: that is not ??? but: justice. ??? that it is possible to say ??? them ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use or No. Come and hear: ??? two ??? of them two ??? he was one from them proper two ??? and the second ??? until ??? "and he sold ??? Is this not ??? in four, a ram and praise ??? And learn from this a person ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use No. Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? Come and hear: ??? a ram ??? on two is valid Learn from this a person ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use No. ??? that I for it is the case that lacking for him ??? Come and hear: ??? a ram ??? Consider this case: he in two, is valid Here in this case, also, ??? we were But the beginning of the teaching, But the beginning of the teaching, ??? in four, ??? other than this ??? for him ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? a ram in four, ??? If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? a sela coin this one lacking for him ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? and if he reasons, ??? a person ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use For he will give ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall a ram son of two ??? in the case of there is not in this case. In reality lit: In the world his reasoning is a person ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use If so, ??? They do not give it we were The reason is ??? restitution ??? lest they shall say a ram less than ??? atones What then do we do about it? Come and hear: in the hour of the parasha (scriptural section) proper a sela coin in the hour of atonement proper two ??? he has fulfilled his obligation he is required Rabbi Eliezer a person ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use or No. that R' Yochanan said how much two greatness this ??? and not "Hear!" The halacha is -- this refers to from me from this general principle it would follow for thus said Rabbi Yochanan yes. and on ??? he said For it was taught in a baraita ??? a thangkgiving-offering ??? and thus ??? and it was lost misplaced so he set aside another one as its replacement, yes. require bread ??? R' Chaninah in the name of R' Yochanan They did not teach such a ruling except after atonement ??? yes. required bread but: before atonement required bread Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use he is required R' Elazar ??? life, ??? or No. that R' Yochanan said Behold! how much two greatness this ??? and not "Hear!" The halacha is -- this refers to from me from this general principle it would follow of R' Yochanan he said yes. for he said: R' Yochanan livestock of two ??? half of it and he returned ??? half of it ??? "Kedushah" It is not ??? and they shall make a substitution. ??? of it Learn from this three Learn from this ??? life, ??? so learn from this the sanctity of ??? so learn from this there are ??? with its monetary value? R' Eliezer asked: ??? in the world" What then? who say (Deut. 12) ??? in the case of And this is present here. or perhaps, (Lev. 5) silver ??? in the case of there is not in this case. that R' Yochanan said how much two ??? in the House of Study: and not ??? The halacha is -- this refers to and not For didn't R' Yochanan said: say R' Shimon son of ??? On account of what No. it was given Torah ??? atonement lest ??? And they do not have the possibility of repair if done improperly to eat ??? I would say No. ??? The halacha is -- this refers to Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi Zeira son of ??? he turned ??? all ??? in front I would say No. ??? The halacha is -- this refers to from him in the House of Study: Back to the main body of the text: Rabbi Yochanan said: It is because of this: ??? On account of what No. it was given ??? atonement lest ??? and they do not have the possibility of repair if done improperly to eat ??? He disagreed with this Abaye Except I can object with text from here: A sin-offering milk ??? to it ??? We come to compare Is this not ??? holy offerings he He disagreed with this Raba Except I can object with text from here: a guilt-offering a Nazir ??? for him ??? he ??? for he said: Rabbi Yochanan It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai yes. to you a thing that he was came ??? except a guilt-offering a Nazir only. it is a problem

דף כז,ב משנה

He set aside i.e., designated one animal from a group as his sin offering did he die No. ??? his son beneath it No. ??? from sin to Watch out for leading vav he sinned Even if ??? on milk who ate ??? No. ??? on milk who ate the day as it is said (Lev. 4) its sacrifice on ??? until that it should be its sacrifice for the sake of lit. in the name of ???

דף כז,ב גמרא

From where in Tanach do we know this? ??? its sacrifice ??? he he would exit and does not he would exit ??? his father It is possible He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? his father ??? his father from ??? on ??? or from ??? on ??? but: he would exit ??? his father from ??? on ??? or from ??? on ??? Scripture states: its sacrifice ??? he he would exit and does not he would exit ??? of his father It is possible He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? his father ??? even from ??? on ??? or from ??? on ??? for behold! yes. ??? on livestock ??? his father but: he would exit ??? his father even from ??? on ??? or from ??? on ??? for behold! a person ??? on coins ??? his father at a time i.e., in a case that are ??? and not at a time i.e., in a case that are ??? Therefore, scripture states: its sacrifice ??? he he would exit And there is no meaning to the word he would exit ??? his father It is possible He has not fulfilled his obligation. Even if ??? even from ??? on ??? or from ??? on ??? but: he would exit ??? for himself even from ??? on ??? or from ??? on ??? Scripture states: its sacrifice on ??? until that it should be for the sake of a sin-offering. It is possible He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? himself ??? for himself even from ??? on ??? or from ??? on ??? which provides if ??? livestock on ??? on the blood on the blood ??? on ??? for behold! No. from by and not ??? but: he would exit ??? for himself from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? or from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? which provides if ??? for himself coins on ??? on the blood on the blood ??? on ??? for behold! from by ??? Scripture states: its sacrifice on ??? until that it should be its sacrifice for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? What then does it mean when it says No. from by and not ??? Rav Shmuel son of ??? in front of Rav ??? This is what he means: immediately that is not ??? also No. atones Because thus in the same way he did not find ??? but: coins immediately For if it was ??? sacrifice the laws of misappropriation of sacred things I would say at the beginning also ??? Come and learn from this.

דף כז,ב משנה

bring in ??? ??? and the sons of ??? and the sons of ??? How so? ??? or ??? the poor ??? "uf" the poor ??? ??? "uf" ???

דף כז,ב גמרא

From where do we learn this? ??? (Lev. 5) ??? on ??? Just as Therefore, scripture states: from where do we learn You say ??? ??? and the sons of ??? and the sons of ??? How so? ??? and the poor ??? "uf" the poor ??? ??? "uf" ??? or ??? or ??? "uf" ??? "uf" ??? No. ??? that do not ??? redemption ??? it is said ??? on ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? regarding ??? or ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? regarding "uf" For if it was it is written he read regarding that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? or ??? For ??? coins ??? on "uf" ??? "uf" ??? and "uf" both of them. varieties of ??? but: ??? varieties of ??? If it was No. it is written he read ??? regarding "uf" ??? For ??? coins ??? No. ??? varieties of ??? he except ??? from ??? coins ??? he returns it is written he read ??? regarding "uf" This comes to imply ??? also ??? This is what he means: For ??? ??? "uf" ??? or ??? and What is the reason מאי טעמא it is written on ??? regarding ??? For if it was it is written on ??? regarding "uf" ??? For ??? coins ??? he ??? or ??? varieties of ??? but: ??? coins ??? If it was No. ??? "uf" and if ??? or ??? coins ??? it is written he read ??? A sin-offering ??? and regarding ??? on ??? Watch out for leading vav !! but for midrash, since we say: R' Eliezer said said Rabbi Osha'ya become tamei make kiddush. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.