It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

??? that it the daughter of his father the daughter of of its mother to say that do not ??? from justice. and R' Isaac reasoned ??? from justice. And if you wish, I would say he learns it ??? R' Elazar said Thus said Rabbi ??? in all places where you finds two ??? and he is spiritually cut off one a portion A sin-offering ??? Who is it ??? As it is written (Ex. 30) on meat a person No. ??? etc. he is spiritually cut off one As it is written (Ex. 30) who ??? and what He shall give" from him on ??? And so based on this lit: from after, ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? the Merciful One Why do I need ??? for him According to the sages, ??? them to say that do not ??? from justice. ??? Isaac ??? for him ??? on ??? that it ??? his father and that it ??? of its mother And the rabbbis ??? from ??? that at the beginning of the teaching and R' Isaac reasoned ??? that at the beginning of the teaching ??? She ??? on ??? that it ??? his father and that it ??? he said ??? Even We also ??? the oil ??? ??? with oil of anointing Why do I need as it is taught: ??? ??? Is this not Thus can we come and learn from this. Just as incense Is this not alone by itself and are obligated upon it he is spiritually cut off alone by itself Even ??? oil ??? also immediately ??? alone by itself are obligated upon it in its own right And if you would say that he came he is required ??? together ??? ??? the oil ??? oil ??? why is it that ??? Is this not Watch out for leading vav And hey, you can also come and hear from this. ??? dividing among the guests sin-offerings ??? that comes on ??? a Tanna taught: in what way ??? He accounts for If it was ??? the his wife ??? to it one If it was ??? that comes on ??? and on ??? them both that R' Yochanan said In reality lit: In the world a Tanna taught: men ??? It was taught by thus that comes on ??? upon it and R' Yishmael She for he said: he is liable two Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches ??? to it like Rabbi Akiva. But the beginning of the teaching, also R' ??? And if you would say Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva ??? derive it ??? Yishmael For didn't R' Abahu say that comes on ??? upon it to R' Yishmael ??? for him ??? (Lev. 18) ??? male, No. ??? (Deut. 23) ??? it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? Israel he is liable two Rabbi Akivah he is not liable except One ??? he read he departs for him male, No. ??? a seminal emission of him. No. ??? except But the beginning of the teaching, R' Yishmael ??? derive it like Rabbi Akiva. If so, ??? also that comes on ??? livestock upon it this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Abaye that comes on ??? livestock upon it Even to R' Yishmael he is not liable except One and so when it is written he read ??? it is written ??? in the name of Rav he said a Tanna taught: It was taught by thirty and three sin-offerings It was taught by three ??? it is taught at the end Passover ??? One who acts Passover ??? why is it that The tanna teaches: them (and there are those who say ??? sacrifice ??? who ??? all the Torah All of it some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry As it is written (Num. 15) Torah One it shall be to you ??? who shall you do in the hand of ??? Just as by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? and do not shall you do Even all ??? and do not shall you do except Is this not Learn from this a Tanna taught: thirty and three sin-offerings one ??? in error and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had a Tanna taught: three ??? ??? They said: Sabbath ??? minus one ??? that R' Yochanan said a Tanna taught: ??? Sabbath ??? that is not he is obligated except one as it is taught: there are that it One ??? Sabbath ??? Sabbath ??? minus one as it is taught: (Lev. 4) One who acts ??? occasions ??? One on all of them occasions ??? on all One and one ??? One that it there are ??? Sabbath ??? a Tanna taught: ??? Sabbath ??? is preferable, for him ??? from this No. ??? and thus you "one who finds" regarding by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry where he teaches ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry How so? Shall I say ??? in the house of by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry reasoned the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue She ??? Behold! his heart to heaven. So rather, that he saw ??? to it If it was Its blood was collected upon it ??? son of stoning he and if that is not ??? Is this not something he except from love ??? This is satistfactory ??? for he said: he is liable except to Raba for he said: is exempt What is there to say?

דף ג,ב גמרא

except in the case of one who says is permitted. that until here, No. ??? of him Raba ??? except If it was one he is obligated If it was both he is obligated but: ??? No. Rav Papa said, brought this very question It concerns itself ??? to among some texts read: the worshipers of stars some texts read: the gentiles ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry and Behold! by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry No. know ??? And if you like, I could say Even if you say ??? For example, that he came ??? he read (Ex. 20) No. ??? will come the God of silver and the God of gold etc. reasoned For ??? and gold but: ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? in the name of Rav ??? he said a Tanna taught: in that place Sabbath in that place by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry The tanna teaches: From where can you derive When the baraita teaches that comes on a woman ??? and on ??? a man Hey, isn't it the case that there are Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? that is not The tanna teaches: to it They said: ??? The tanna teaches: that is not ??? No. The tanna teaches: ??? the daughter of his wife the daughter of ??? the daughter of he built ??? and not The tanna teaches: except in that place a woman ??? The tanna teaches: So, here, in that place Sabbath in that place by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry The tanna teaches: Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? pointed out a contradiction. ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Rav Bibi son of Abaye thus in that place Sabbath The tanna teaches: in that place by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry The tanna teaches: ??? outside he is liable ??? except outside he is liable and has a problem to Rav Bibi bar Abaye If so, this one For it was taught in a baraita thirty ??? in the Torah ??? "satisfied" ??? That there are ??? What then does it mean when it says has a problem ??? in that place ??? The tanna teaches: who he is equivalent. Sabbath ??? a Tanna taught: ??? regarding ??? in that place Sabbath The tanna teaches: in that place by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry The tanna teaches: regarding ??? who a Tanna taught: ??? thus R' brought this very question ??? Zeira two ??? Is this not one What then? He said to him ??? and raised up ??? Behold! two ??? If it was for one ??? it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there No. ??? except If so, ??? Even here, No. ??? unless it is ??? for one ??? to it ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 12) in that place ??? in that place shall you do There is an analogy between ??? Just as ??? No. ??? unless it is ??? Even ??? No. ??? unless it is ??? Perhaps two ??? Is this not one ??? Just as She ??? He said to him for it is the case that ??? of R' Yochanan and Reish Lakish: ??? regarding ??? the master of ??? it is a problem to us and What is the difference regarding ??? It was taught by ??? and regarding ??? No. It was taught by ??? that R' Yochanan said Because and both of them, ??? one ??? And let him say ??? and not Let him say the master of ??? his reasoning is Because and he opens the scripture ??? and Reish Lakish: he said Because And there is no meaning to the word in it It once happened and Reish Lakish: What is the reason? did not say ??? Yochanan Thus said Rabbi ??? for it is the case that ??? there are. ??? And R' Yochanan said: to you ??? you shall ??? did not occur ??? and R' Yochanan What is the reason מאי טעמא did not say ??? his reasoning is Which Tanna taught: ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva for he said: No. in the case of It once happened and Reish Lakish: ??? it does not require It once happened Rabbah It once happened ??? he is required the master of ??? What then does it mean when it says It once happened is in it ??? you shall It once happened ??? What then does it mean when it says It once happened is in it ??? you shall It once happened ??? you shall It once happened ??? Even if According to the sages, They challenged him from this teaching: ??? he is not liable except on a thing in which there is in it It once happened For example, ??? it is a problem to us ??? of it It once happened and he said Reish Lakish: So, with whom does it agree? Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva for he said: No. in the case of It once happened And R' Yochanan said: Even if you say rabbis ??? you shall It once happened from this general principle it would follow ??? for him ??? who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? According to the sages, shall not be It once happened ??? you shall It once happened So rather, and thus he comes to say Reish Lakish: ??? you shall It once happened ??? who follow the reasoning ??? ??? but: According to the sages, shall not be It once happened ??? why is it that It was taught by he has fulfilled his obligation ??? in which is not It once happened ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? and the master of ??? one ??? The tanna teaches: ??? the master of ??? and not Let the Tanna teach: ??? It is necessary to teach this for him For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because and then it is written he is spiritually cut off ??? in a place sacrifice I would say give thanks for him to Rabbi ??? Come and learn from this. that is not ??? he said the master of ??? where he teaches ??? He disagreed with this Raba If so, we were ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry except Rabba said: ??? to his fellow He said to him Abaye If so, we were ??? He said to him the Torah he said ??? For example, this by stoning, So rather, ??? justice. he He said to him As it is taught: ??? one ??? The greatness and one ??? a child And even if ??? he is liable Abayye said: And if one who seeks ??? is forbidden and if ??? secondly, Sarai to R' Yochanan for he said: ??? you shall It once happened ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.