It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ו,א גמרא

??? Is this not the validity She perhaps, ??? Abayye said: now that you said the signs that we given? the validity She ??? he is regularly accustomed ??? and now he read ??? Kerati ??? and dates. He said to him Rav ??? to his children: For ??? in front ??? from the beginning ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? in the presence of ??? And so ??? in the presence of ??? they saw ??? as it is said (Is. 30) they were your eyes ??? ??? And so ??? on ??? and so when in what way does ??? and not ??? of high quality ??? (I Sam 2) ??? and shall you say ??? my heart in Hashem. ??? and not ??? David Solomon ??? the grave ??? from reversed No. ??? ??? The Rabbis taught ??? ??? to teach of it or ??? is exempt ??? of it he is liable ??? of it is exempt except ??? and who that it is possible the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? For didn't Rabbi Shimon say ben Pazi: R' Yehoshua said: ??? It is because of this: bar-Kappara the voice of ??? They do not have It is because of this: the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? after ??? yes. in it It is because of this: the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? yes. to you Another thing: that it was made ??? the offering is subject to the laws of misappropriation. Why is it that No. Consider this case: terumah of ??? and they are subject to the laws of misappropriation It is because of this: that there is terumah of ??? and Priestly garments two the Writings that come ??? and all two ??? those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? This is satistfactory According to the sages, except to R' ??? What is there to say? as it is taught: (Lev. 17) ??? in that place This teaches ??? Rabbi ??? says kosher there are. ??? for just as Therefore, scripture states: ??? in that place that did not have He shall make use of them by day ??? after It is because of this: that there is terumah of ??? two ??? those who are coming back ??? and all two ??? those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? terumah of ??? Who is it as it is taught: (Lev. 6) was his name next to the altar of This teaches ??? wagon ??? Who is it as it is taught: (Deut. 21) ??? in that place the wagon ??? ??? two ??? that come ??? Here in this case, certainly yes. ??? It is because of this: that there is two ??? it is written was his name justice. yes. something other than this No. regarding wagon ??? it is written ??? yes. something other than this No. The Rabbis taught ??? the frankincense ??? of ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? Six ten of Six ten a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? two ten ??? three ??? nine ??? nine ??? wine ??? three ??? three Watch out for leading vav !! And if he doesn't have wine ??? sends ??? salt ??? Any thing that was R' Natan says: Even ??? the Jordan Any thing that was and if he gave of it honey ??? One from all ??? he is liable death ??? he does not except ??? of it ??? so that that it should be ??? wine ??? in it ??? so that that it should be ??? Is it not the case that who pilgrimage festivals ??? to it except that do not ??? who pilgrimage festivals ??? That would be a support to him. To whose position? to R' ??? for he said: (Ex. 30) and that which was sanctified for Temple use She and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? to you all ??? No. ??? except ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? and there were in that place items ??? for their wages, Behold! items ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? If it was livestock raw lit., living a Tanna taught: for him If it was ??? eighty ??? a Tanna taught: for him except Is this not incense R' Osha'ya said ??? for their wages, as it is taught: is permitted. ??? Just as they were doing of it they were they separate ??? the reward for The workers ??? it on coins The workers ??? those particular ??? for their wages, ??? it ??? Rav Yosef disagreed this one in all of them are permitted It was taught by ??? it ??? and here in this other case, No. It was taught by except Rav Yosef said on the first ??? The Rabbis taught incense it was she was made ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? opposite ??? the sun three from where do we learn ??? he brings in the high priest fill ??? by day ??? for their wages, As it is taught: is permitted. ??? Just as they were doing of it they separate ??? the reward for The workers ??? it on coins The workers ??? those particular ??? for their wages, ??? it ???

דף ו,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: is permitted. ??? One ??? or ??? year" they were ??? it ??? For this reason an individual ??? he is liable these are the words of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel who said it in the name of the viceroy but: ??? and one fourth No. I hear But the sages say: in all day ??? and it was the case that he brings in That would be a support to him. To whose position? to Raba for he said: Raba ??? he is liable As it is written (Ex. 30) ??? who shall you do all ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? in the morning ??? twilight The Rabbis taught they were we make him repeat it ??? occasions in the year in the days of the sun ??? that did not have ??? in the days of the rains ??? so that that did not have ??? he shatters says ??? these are the words of Abba ??? son of Yochanan and three from where do we learn ??? he brings in fill ??? he gives it ??? in the evening, Yom Kippur. ??? proper proper so that that it should be that are small from ??? As it is taught: (Lev. 16) that are small Just as Scripture states: Does it not clearly ??? say (Ex. 30) ??? from him ??? Just as Scripture states: that are small so that that it should be that are small from ??? Mar said: ??? he shatters says ??? That would be a support to him. To whose position? to R' Yochanan for he said: Rabbi Yehudah in the same way ??? evil" ??? thus ??? proper ??? that R' Yochanan said the 11th ??? to him to Moses at Sinai Rav Huna said What scripture supports this position? (Ex. 30) "Take to you ??? two ??? this one five ??? five this one ten frankincense took possession one this one one ??? and so go ahead and say ??? A general principle: ??? creates an exclusion ??? and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? a thing ??? and ascend ??? Even any thing ??? and ascend ??? And if you would say If so, to write he read one ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was the writing of ??? tree yes. but: ??? No. and because of this the writing of ??? and if the writing of ??? yes. but: ??? tree I would say No. It is because of this: thus the writing of ??? he came because of ??? evil" If so, a purchase to you ??? for him and so go ahead and say ??? If so, ??? together the end of ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael It was taught by ??? A general principle: ??? creates an exclusion ??? and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? a thing ??? and ascend ??? Even any thing ??? and ascend ??? Or perhaps, except A general principle: are in the general category ??? and creates an exclusion ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? Is this not this one yes. to you upon you ??? the last except ??? Mar said: Or perhaps, except A general principle: are in the general category ??? and creates an exclusion ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? Is this not this one yes. upon you ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? thus ??? has a problem ??? two For ??? he returns and a second person ??? for if so, ??? he read ??? And what does it mean when it says creates an exclusion ??? thus ??? has a problem varieties of trees ??? from ??? also ??? took possession ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. trapping of ??? a thing ??? And even though that do not ??? and ascend he returns he said If so, ??? he read ??? took possession ??? If it was ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense took possession ??? there shall be two ten If so, ??? he read Watch out for leading vav frankincense took possession ??? in the end ??? he said ??? Just as ??? incense a thing ??? and ascend Thus said Rabbi ??? son of ??? Thus said Rabbi Shimon the Chasid: all ??? where there is not in it ??? Israel It is not ??? for behold! ??? evil" ??? the scripture with ??? incense Abaye said from here (Amos 9) ??? on earth ??? with oil ??? The Rabbis taught ??? with oil of anointing to a domesticated animal and vessels is exempt some texts read: to the worshippers of the stars some texts say: to gentiles ??? is exempt This is satisfactory livestock and vessels As it is written (Ex. 30) on meat a person No. ??? and livestock and vessels Is this not a person he the dead also is exempt ??? for him did he die ??? Is this not a person except some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles why is it that is exempt this one a person ??? As it is written (Ezek. 34) ??? a person "You "You ??? a person And there is no meaning to the word some texts read: the worshipers of stars some texts read: the gentiles ??? a person For it is written (Num. 31) ??? a person Six ten ??? He said to him This certain individual To exclude livestock For it is written (Jonah 4) and as for me, No. ??? on ??? etc. This certain individual To exclude livestock And if you wish, I would say ??? a Tanna taught: in front ??? all ??? and all that is not ??? he does not ??? Another teaching ??? with oil of anointing to a domesticated animal and vessels some texts read: to the worshippers of the stars some texts say: to gentiles and the dead is exempt for kings to the priests ??? he is obligated And R' Yehudah exempts and how much time is the duration of ??? he is liable R' Meir says Any thing that was Rabbi Yehudah says an olive's volume For didn't Rabbi Yehudah say is exempt For he exempted R' Yehudah regarding kings and priests regarding ??? he is obligated ??? And R' Yehudah in what way ??? Thus said Rabbi Joseph In this case, ??? reasoned on meat a person No. ??? it is written and then it is written (Ex. 30) and what He shall give" from him on ??? Just as ??? Any thing that was Even ??? Any thing that was And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned ??? of the world Just as ??? of the world an olive's volume Even ??? an olive's volume but: ??? kings and priests the words of all are Any thing that was and Thus said Rabbi Joseph in what way ??? Rabbi Meir And Rabbi Yehudah regarding kings and priests ??? reasoned and what He shall give" from him on ??? it is written a king and a priest now ??? And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned in the case of until That there are ??? from its beginning and until ??? a king and a priest from the beginning Is this not ??? are they, Thus said Rabbi ??? the son of of Rav Ami ??? as it is taught:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.