It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יא,א משנה

But if it is before, and its owners have not atoned, it shall go to pasture until such time as it becomes disqualified and it shall be sold. And another shall be taken with the proceeds and they shall make a substitution. And it is subject to the laws of misappropriation.

דף יא,א גמרא

What is different about the beginning of the teaching, where they don't disagree, And what is different about the end of the teaching where they do disagree? At the beginning of the teaching, he the Tanna does distinguish. At the end, he the Tanna does not distinguish. But hey, wasn't this already taught elsewhere regarding substitute offerings? It was taught there i.e., in another mishna because it was relevant to substitute offerings. It was taught here in our mishna because it was relevant to misappropriation

דף יא,א משנה

??? coins ??? benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. because of that are ??? in going all of them peace-offerings did he die they were to him coins ??? coins ??? he is equivalent. A sin-offering shall go to the Sea of Salt benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. he is equivalent. an elevation-offering ??? an elevation-offering but the laws of misappropriation apply to them, he is equivalent. peace-offerings ??? peace-offerings and they are eaten ??? one And there is no meaning to the word ??? bread

דף יא,א גמרא

He disagreed with this ??? ??? also ??? coins ??? benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. because of that are ??? that did not come ??? and the sons of ??? that which is in the past ??? Rabba said: he said Torah ??? that comes peace-offerings he said Torah that comes ??? that did not come ??? are not ???

דף יא,א משנה

Rabbi Shimon says: the blood ??? at the beginning and a donkey ??? blood ??? they are not subject to the laws of misappropriation he has fulfilled his obligation ??? the offering is subject to the laws of misappropriation. ??? We apply the laws of misappropriation to them They descended ??? We do not apply the laws of misappropriation to them

דף יא,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught they are subject to the laws of misappropriation with its monetary value? These are the words of R' Meir and Rabbi Shimon but the sages say they are not subject to the laws of misappropriation What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? they are not subject to the laws of misappropriation Ulla said Scripture states: (Lev. 17) and as for me, ??? to you ??? he of the academy of R' Yishmael a Tanna taught: ??? and not ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: Scripture states: (Lev. 17) For the blood he ??? before atonement ??? atonement he Just as after atonement they do not have the laws of misappropriation. Even before atonement they do not have the laws of misappropriation. and so go ahead and say Just as before atonement there are in it the laws of misappropriation of sacred things Even after atonement there are in it the laws of misappropriation of sacred things And so there are to you a thing ??? and there are in it the laws of misappropriation of sacred things why is it that No.

דף יא,ב גמרא

Behold! terumah of ??? that it was made ??? and there are in it the laws of misappropriation of sacred things It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected terumah of ??? a male goat ??? two ??? those who are coming back ??? and all two ??? those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? This is satistfactory ??? a male goat ??? Watch out for leading vav But we do not benefit from them except for one for he said: we benefit from them What is there to say? It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected terumah of ??? and Priestly garments two ??? those who are coming back ??? and all two ??? those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? This is satistfactory According to the sages, that they said (Lev. 16) ??? in that place This teaches that are ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except to Rabbi ??? for he said: is permitted. ??? of them a priest ??? What is there to say? It is because of this: ??? terumah of ??? two ??? those who are coming back ??? This is satistfactory ??? yes. ??? except ??? What is there to say? two ??? are written Watch out for leading vav And it is written there (Deut. 21) ??? And it is written there (Lev. 6) was his name next to the altar of Behold! yes. something other than this ??? We apply the laws of misappropriation to them ??? Let us say, ??? that is not ??? son of Rabbi ??? as it is taught: ??? son of Rabbi ??? says ??? a child he was between ??? of ??? One ??? year" The "flowers of the priesthood" i.e., the newest priests ??? in it and bring in wine ??? that he was ??? of figs ??? it ??? as it is said (Num. 28) ??? the reward for to Hashem in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? and Ravina said We come to compare ??? It is written here ??? And it is written there (Ex. 29) ??? ??? in fire and does not eat For ??? are these Just as notar ??? Even This also ??? even you say R' Elazar son of Rabbi ??? For if it was ??? that it is possible that they said Let us say, ??? son of R' ??? For if it was ??? They said: No. and According to Rabbinic law, Hey, isn't it the case that he read ??? to it ???

דף יא,ב משנה

??? An altar of ??? benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. ??? at the beginning We do apply the laws of misappropriation to it. ??? that did not come ??? and the sons of ??? that which is in the past ??? benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply.

דף יא,ב גמרא

???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.