It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יא,א גמרא

??? blood ??? all my days: ??? all my days: ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yosei And R' Yehudah and Rabbi Shimon say Watch out for leading vav And they did not say ??? except ??? the first but: in the second imparts tumah ??? in the time of ??? and if she saw the first ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? and she saw ??? and she saw ??? and she saw ??? to it ??? for what Shall I say ??? this one all day that is not ??? No. ??? except ??? For it was taught: all ??? compulsion even how much occasions No. ??? Is this not No. ??? A general principle: No. No. ??? but: ??? to it ??? This is obvious! Rav Ashi said For example, ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on Shabbat ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on Shabbat ??? and not ??? on Shabbat ??? without ??? What would you have said? ??? the validity at the end of eating, before they leave ??? he ??? and not ??? Come and learn from this. ??? also ??? the tooth and that one that is not ??? It is because of this: ??? No. the proper time arrived for ??? other than this Thus said Rabbi ??? and she saw ??? and she saw ??? and she saw ??? to it ??? and not ??? How so? Thus said Rabbi ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on Shabbat ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on Shabbat ??? and not ??? on Shabbat ??? without ??? for in that place ??? the validity ??? he that he came is destiny? ???

דף יא,א משנה

despite the fact where they said ??? it requires to be ??? except for ??? on blood ??? and a woman who had sexual relations ??? except able to rest on blood ??? and a virgin ??? occasions it requires to be ??? morning, or whether ??? and at the hour that it ??? ??? about them ??? at the hour that are they eat from terumah Rabbi Yehudah says Even in the hour of ??? for the purpose of eating terumah

דף יא,א גמרא

except for ??? my days: ??? it does not require examination This is satistfactory to Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) for he said: a woman ??? to it ??? in the midst of my days: ??? And there is no meaning to the word a woman ??? to it ??? in the midst of my days: ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except to Rabbi Yochanan for he said: a woman ??? to it ??? in the midst of my days: ??? perhaps, ??? to it ??? He could say to you Rabbi Yochanan For I thought to say I in a case ??? but: ??? if it was open, No. ??? on blood ??? on blood ??? This is satistfactory for Rav, for he said: a summary of one he the Torah ??? and the Torah ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except ??? for he said: two ??? are these ??? perhaps, ??? No. ??? This certain individual a summary of tamei He could say to you Levi So, with whom does it agree?

דף יא,ב גמרא

the academy of Shammai She that they said a summary of one he ??? to us a Tanna taught: like the academy of Shammai ??? and after this It is a disagreement he and all ??? and after this It is a disagreement That is not the halacha ??? who The tanna teaches: ??? The tanna teaches: If it was ??? what is there to say? What would you have said? ??? to it ??? Come and learn from this. ??? tahor ??? tamei No. ??? This is satistfactory ??? for he said: two ??? are these except for Rav, for he said: a summary of one he ??? perhaps, ??? to it ??? even thus ??? No. ??? and a woman who had sexual relations ??? It was taught there: ??? that did not come ??? to see and gets married the academy of Shammai say ??? to it four nights. And the academy of Hillel say until ??? Rav said ??? Shmuel said They did not teach such a ruling except that did not have a division from ??? and she saw that did not have ??? but: a division from ??? and she saw that is tamei he crossed night One without ??? and she saw that is tamei ??? of it that is tamei He challenged this "He" meaning... R' ??? and a virgin ??? why is it that ??? of it Rabba said: I would say But the beginning of the teaching, except for ??? on blood ??? he that is not ??? examination but: a virgin ??? examination except ??? here, ??? sun ??? here, that did not have ??? Another teaching is like this: In what matters are we saying this? that did not have a division from ??? and she saw that did not have ??? but: a division from ??? and she saw that is tamei he crossed night One without ??? and she saw that is tamei ??? of it ??? occasions She it requires ??? R' Yehudah said: Shmuel said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: for her husband. it is permitted. This is obvious! morning, We have learnt in a Mishna: except If it was said, ??? was it said; and at the hour that it ??? ??? R' Yehudah said: Shmuel said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? examination ??? also examination for her husband. but: It is not ??? No. ??? examination And what can we come and learn from this? ??? all the women of a presumption that ??? If it was ??? then I might incorrectly say: What case is he dealing with? ??? in which there is to it ??? but: a woman that it does not have ??? examination Hey, isn't it the case that ??? in which there is to it ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? between in which there is to it ??? between It does not have ??? But hey, come and learn from this. ??? to it ??? examination ??? also examination for her husband. Hey, isn't it the case that he said Shmuel one ??? for he said: Rabbi Zeira he said Rabbi Abba son of ??? Shmuel said a woman that it does not have ??? forbidden ??? until ??? one from this general principle it would follow ??? was it said; Another teaching is like this: In what matters are we saying this? ??? but: for her husband. it is permitted. In what matters are we saying this? ??? of a presumption that that is tahor but: ??? of a presumption that that is tamei In reality lit: In the world She ??? until to say to him am tahor

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.