It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כב,א גמרא

Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? one master reasons that ??? of a woman to see blood ??? and one master reasons that yes. ??? of a woman to see blood ??? Rava said: everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world yes. ??? of a woman to see blood ??? and here in this other case, ??? that is tahor ??? tamei what they disagree about of Rabbi Eliezer reasoned a woman that is tahor ??? tamei for it is the case that will come a way ??? And the rabbbis reason that a woman that is tahor ??? tahor Rabbah brought this very question ??? the one who sees a seminal emission ??? What then? (Lev. 15) from him the Merciful One in the Torah says until ??? and not ??? or, perhaps, This from him until ??? outwards And even if ??? also He said to him: Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? himself he does not become tamei except ??? the mouth of ??? This comes to imply ??? you shall Except I can object with text from here: to ??? Why is it that It was taught: (Lev. 15) this ??? and what ??? from him emitting seed Just as a gonorrheal emission ??? Even emitting seed also act of demolishing He said to him: ??? we were The reason is ??? on account of where it is not possible to it without ??? a gonorrheal emission Except I can object with text from here: ??? all ??? Why is it that It was taught: this ??? etc. Just as a gonorrheal emission ??? Even emitting seed act of demolishing If it was Just as a gonorrheal emission ??? all ??? Even emitting seed also act of demolishing all ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 15) ??? of it yes. to you of it except Just as ??? of it ??? one day He said to him: ??? the scripture She a gonorrheal emission ??? that is not Willow of it emitting seed ??? all seven ??? a gonorrheal emission ??? of it emitting seed No. ??? except one day R' Yosi brought this very question the son of Rabbi Chanina ??? blood ??? What then? (Lev. 15) For ??? of its blood the Merciful One in the Torah says until ??? for him ??? yes. ??? No. or, perhaps, This For ??? of its blood ??? She And really even ??? also He said to him ??? blood ??? meat the dead impart tumah ??? He said to him: ??? was it made? ??? No. ??? for me For ??? for me ??? from the beginning Here, too, ??? ???

דף כב,ב גמרא

if ??? that is tamei If so, without ??? also Rabbah said For No. ??? the son of in its own right She and who that it is possible For This ??? yes. For it was taught: R' Elazar said ??? two ??? raised up Abba ??? It once happened ??? and They asked Abba and Abba He asked to the sages and the sages They asked ??? And they said to them a woman -- this refers to ??? there are to it in the midst of ??? if ??? that is tamei and for the remainder It once happened ??? and she entered and the request Abba and Abba He asked to the sages and the sages ??? And they said to them ??? there are to it in the midst of ??? if ??? that is tamei Raysh Lakish said ??? Another teaching is like this: ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? atop ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Ravina said ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? There is this difference between them: there i.e., in another mishna We have learnt in a Mishna: how much She ??? in the time of Here in this case, What then does it mean when it says who ??? in the time of or No. ??? in the case of ??? in the time of but if the blood went out ??? No. or, perhaps, there is no difference ??? also Rabbi Yehudah In this case, Raysh Lakish said ??? and It is the rabbis' position And Rabbi Yochanan said: even if you say it’s Rabbi Yehudah, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yehudah there i.e., in another mishna except regarding ??? that He performs blood ??? you shall ??? but: the son of shall not be ??? for thus said Rabbi Yochanan ??? without blood what they disagree about ??? also R' Yehudah In this case, one ??? he would say over thus Rabbi Yochanan ??? who both say ??? And the rabbbis ??? livestock ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said What is the reason מאי טעמא For R' ??? Because ??? in it ??? like a person Except I can object with text from here: ??? shall be of its mother that is tamei ??? Because and it is said in it ??? like a person as it is said (Gen. 1) ??? God ??? who were adults They said: ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? What then does it mean when it says practical distinction this one It was taught in the academy of Rabbi Yishmael, (Lev. 14) ??? (Lev. 14) came ??? This is ??? This is ??? And furthermore, ??? As it is written (Gen. 1) ??? God a person ??? They said: ??? ??? ??? except ??? regarding a person ??? regarding livestock ??? regarding a person ??? regarding ??? he does not ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? regarding livestock Shall I say From the fact that it is written (Gen. 1) ??? God ??? the land and then it is written (Gen. 2) ??? God from the land" all ??? the field regarding ??? also ??? As it is written (Gen. 1) and all ??? the land" and then it is written (Gen. 1) ??? God ??? who were adults ??? As it is written there i.e., in another mishna ??? he And what does it mean when it says practical distinction between ??? one ??? practical distinction for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said It is because of this: Rabbi Yishmael all ??? the value of that is not ??? all the essence yes. ??? one to Rabbi Yishmael ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? According to the sages, ??? the words of all are ??? and We do not answer and Rabbi Yishmael What is the difference between ??? one ??? practical distinction ??? That there are ??? one ??? one

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.