It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כג,א גמרא

??? the Merciful One to a domesticated animal ??? so that thus it will be that is not ??? from ??? one Rav Acha the son of of Raba he would say over to it in the name of Rabbi ??? all ??? the value of that is not ??? all the essence ??? one to Rabbi Yishmael ??? and We do not answer According to the sages, ??? the words of all are ??? and We do not answer and According to the sages, What is the difference between ??? one ??? all the essence And these words apply only in the case of והני מילי in a case ??? to it ??? one and one such that there is not ??? all the essence Is this not for this it has ??? Is this not for this it has ??? that is not ??? all the essence and we complete it ??? one and here in this other case, What then does it mean when it says ??? that it is possible It is because of this: That there are ??? Just as to a person which provides become tamei ??? and thus Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said we were The reason is of Rabbi Meir Because ??? in it ??? like a person He said to him Rabbi Ami Except I can object with text from here: ??? a mountain of its mother that is tamei ??? as it is said (Amos 4) For there are "Who forms mountains and creates wind of He said to him: a mountain does anyone lit., who comes to ??? the stone She that he came ??? This certain individual ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? wind of shall be of its mother that is tamei ??? Because ??? in it ??? like a person As it is written (Amos 4) and creates wind of And if you say No. ??? for him ??? "Who forms mountains wind of and then it is written and creates wind of Learn from this ??? He said to him ??? these are the words of Torah in words of Torah And there is no meaning to the word ??? these are the words of Torah in words of ??? said Rabbah son of son of ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: we were The reason is of Rabbi Meir Because ??? a person Except I can object with text from here: ??? a snake shall be of its mother that is tamei ??? Because ??? a person And if you say Here, too, Let the Tanna teach: a snake If it was a Tanna taught: a snake then I might incorrectly say: ??? he ??? rabbis upon it of Rabbi Meir that is not it is written of him. ??? but: livestock raw lit., living does not disagree ??? of him. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that regarding ??? The tanna teaches: to it ??? a circle-cake ??? a person There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? Rabbi ??? he said we were The reason is of Rabbi Meir Because ??? before them ??? a person Consider this case: "uf" ??? before him and he said ??? Abayye said: ??? and in the remainder of ??? No. They challenged him from this teaching: R' Chaninah son of ??? says can be seen These are the words of Rabbi Meir. ??? raw lit., living these are the words of the sages ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? What is the difference livestock raw lit., living ??? a person ??? also except This is obvious! in the remainder of ??? from this general principle it would follow of Rabbi Meir ??? in the remainder of ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: R' Chaninah son of ??? says can be seen These are the words of Rabbi Meir. ??? raw lit., living and it is the law ??? these are the words of the sages in the remainder of ??? No. ??? with them except ??? but: in the remainder of ??? he would acknowledge the correct position of them For it was taught: R' Elazar said ??? livestock raw lit., living according to the words of ??? and according to the words of the sages he does not ??? for one ??? Is this not according to the words of ??? for he said: ??? yes. the remainder of ??? did not say Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? No. ??? According to the sages, that they said ??? yes. the remainder of ??? No. and What is the difference ??? raw lit., living Because and there is regarding them ??? like a person Rabbi brought this very question ??? Zeira According to Rabbi Meir, for he said: livestock ??? a woman ??? he ??? of it ??? What then? for what practical distinction ??? This comes to imply ??? For didn't Rav Yehudah say Rav said No. he said ??? except Because ??? shall endure Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov Up to this point, They brought Rabbi ??? to R' Zeira to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? and not ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rav Yehudah said Rav said No. he said Rabbi Meir except Because ??? shall endure Rav said ???

דף כג,ב גמרא

Even We also ??? livestock raw lit., living and "uf" ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. but the sages say until that it should be in it ??? a person ??? a sandal-fish or ??? or then the ruling is acceptable. ??? but that which is coming out ??? that comes after him: first-born ??? and does not first-born ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? that comes after him: first-born ??? who you shall Rabba said: In reality lit: In the world ??? and It is different there in that case For scripture said: (Deut. 21) ??? who that his heart ??? upon it he has fulfilled his obligation this that do not his heart ??? upon it Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? brought this very question ??? to Rabbi Meir for he said: livestock ??? a woman ??? he a person ??? livestock What then does it mean when it says for what ??? of him ??? in cases regarding eating ??? for him ??? of R' Yochanan for thus said Rabbi Yochanan ??? ??? and found of it ??? forbidden in cases regarding eating thus now there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? that it is possible and not a parsa that it is possible Here in this case, ??? there is not in this case. a parsa from this ??? but the sages say all in which is not ??? Rav said Yirmiyah bar Abba Rav said Everyone acknowledges ??? and his face a person a person ??? a person and his face ??? and not anything No. ??? except ??? a person and created ??? One ??? for Rabbi ??? says ??? a person but the sages say all the image of a person He said to him: for Rav, Yirmiyah bar Abba Hey, isn't it the case that ??? It was taught: Rabbi Meir says: all the image of but the sages say ??? He said to them If it was It was taught: It was taught: he said R' Yirmiyah bar Abba Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? the elder until ??? all of them ??? Rava said: ??? and the well ??? the elder until ??? all of them as one and does not disagree this one ??? all the image of this one ??? They challenged him from this teaching: the image of ??? where they said even ??? one from ??? except for ??? This comes to imply ??? also ??? Abayye said: For this teaching ??? It was taught: ??? all the image of And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world ??? And what does it mean when it says one one one Rabba said: created ??? One one who recites a blessing one from the trapping of of its mother that is tamei in the midst of of its mother that is tahor Rabba said: ??? of its mother that is tamei ??? of its mother that is tahor The Rabbis taught ??? yes. of its mother that is tamei ??? and Who is ??? Rabbi says so that where one removes ??? from ??? and how much time is the duration of ??? from ??? Rabbi ??? says

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.