It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

and both of them, No. ??? except ??? rabbis reason that For Sotah Just as Sotah doubt whether She ??? Here in this case, also, doubt whether ??? If it was ??? I would say For Sotah Just as Sotah in the public domain tahor Here in this case, also, in the public domain tahor thus now there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? he ??? in the public domain there is not in this case. Here in this case, It is because of this: lacking he What do I have to learn from lacking in the public domain What do I have to learn from lacking in a personal domain And if you say this one all doubt whether ??? in the public domain tahor immediately That there are both ??? he is equivalent. and Rabbi Shimon reasoned For Sotah Just as Sotah in the public domain tahor Here in this case, also, in the public domain tahor If it was ??? I would say For Sotah Just as Sotah in a personal domain that is tamei certainly Here in this case, also, in a personal domain that is tamei certainly thus now there i.e., in another mishna there are pilgrimage festivals for a matter of for behold! ??? to it ??? Here in this case, What then does it mean when it says pilgrimage festivals for a matter of that it is possible And if you like, I could say we were The reason is of Rabbi Shimon ??? the end of ??? Just as the beginning of ??? doubt whether ??? doubt whether No. ??? in the public domain tahor Even the end of ??? doubt whether he immersed doubt whether No. he immersed in the public domain tahor And the rabbbis thus now there i.e., in another mishna a person of a presumption that ??? he arises from doubt No. ??? for him ??? Here in this case, a person of a presumption that ??? he arises from doubt No. ??? for him ??? and what is the difference here, ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? become tamei at the end of eating, before they leave until ??? ??? and not he was in it ??? or until ??? there i.e., in another mishna also immediately That there are ??? he is equivalent. And if you wish, I could say we were The reason is ??? Because and the woman ??? on herself and Hallel ??? who pilgrimage festivals She ??? that is old that is old also ??? something ??? who pilgrimage festivals ??? a mute give thanks ??? this one all the women The tanna teaches: all the women ??? ??? women To exclude from that of Rabbi Eliezer for thus said Rabbi Eliezer four women And naught else Come and learn from this. all the women ??? Let us say, We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? that is not ??? Abayye said: give thanks ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? No. ??? of ??? No. ??? This blood ??? will come If you like, I could say we were his reason ??? blood from the beginning it was. will come and Hallel ??? the house of ??? the house of ??? No. ??? blood a woman who had sexual relations ??? What is there to say? Abayye said: give thanks ??? Rava said: ??? also ??? give thanks Raba ??? and What is the difference between Behold! ???

דף ג,ב גמרא

There is this difference between them: ??? that it is possible ??? there is not in this case. ??? and What is the difference between This ??? that it is possible ??? to Raba that it is possible ??? It was taught: For This ??? blood from the beginning it was. will come He said to him: Hallel ??? Don't you acknowledge ??? of it ??? -- this refers to and it is found ??? He said to him: but: for just as ??? between -- this refers to ??? there are to it ??? It does not have ??? Rava said: The reason is ??? It is because of this: ??? Another teaching is like this: He said to him: ??? If so, ??? the daughters of Israel ??? and The one who teaches This ??? This was taught For ??? blood from the beginning it was. will come there i.e., in another mishna Hallel he ??? he reasoned The reason is ??? blood from the beginning it was. will come ??? for him a large basket He said to him: ??? The reason is ??? It is because of this: ??? and for what ??? also ??? a large basket ??? there are to it ??? It does not have ??? and for one for it teaches: This ??? This was taught For ??? It is because of this: ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him Hallel ??? yes. The reason is ??? blood from the beginning it was. will come ??? One who acts a fence ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed ??? from all the Torah All of it ??? a fence He said to him: If so, ??? the daughters of Israel ??? and Hallel ??? who ??? he ??? also No. ??? thus his heart knocks at him ??? it was said: a large basket ??? of it ??? -- this refers to and it is found ??? Hezekiyah said: ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? and Hallel ??? For ??? and Hallel ??? in which there is to it ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? and Rabbi Yochanan ??? that it does not have ??? It does not have ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא of R' Yochanan It does not have ??? and there are to it ??? For it was taught: ??? ten ??? water "In the case of this one after that one," and it is found ??? on the first from them he tamei and all of them ??? and Raysh Lakish said It is because of this: Rabbi ??? They did not teach such a ruling except that it does not have ??? but: there are to it ??? all of them ??? Let us say, ??? he does not have For R' ??? No. ??? So, too, ??? No. ??? upon them ??? upon them And if you like, I could say For ??? and Hallel ??? that is not ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.