It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לב,א גמרא

??? She as it is taught: a child and a small one No. ??? and not ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. They said to him: According to Rabbi Meir, proper is what you say? Do you really mean that? that do not ??? a man It is written ??? a woman ??? and What is the reason? yes. ??? He said to them: a child lest he shall find ??? a small one lest ??? that did not have in a place a commandment And the rabbbis ??? according to ??? and most of children Is this not ??? according to ??? and most of ??? Is this not ??? I will say ??? for him According to Rabbi Meir, ??? but: ??? that is not ??? who ??? for him Here, too, ??? he as it is taught: R' Yosi said It once happened ??? before ??? and he said Rabbi It once happened in the house of the gates ??? before ??? and Thus said Rabbi Joseph It once happened ??? before ??? This is satisfactory of R' Yosi and of Rabbi It is because of this: terumah of ??? except of Rav Yosef why do I have for this statement that Shmuel said poses a contradiction: yes. terumah of ??? forbidden except ??? and what case is he dealing with? in cases regarding eating but: ??? did not say Mar Zutra No. ??? except of the sukkah oil of terumah as it is taught: (Lev. 22) and not ??? my sanctity the Children of Israel who ??? to Hashem ??? ??? and one who drinks drink why do I have he read drink are in the general category food except ??? ??? And if you wish, I would say from here (Ps. 109) ??? If so, ??? also We ??? a woman and the woman And so ??? them No. ??? in them? rabbis we do not have that is not ??? a woman and the woman And so ??? No. ??? them ??? in them? rabbis What then does it mean when it says a woman and the woman as it is taught: a woman yes. for me except a woman ??? the daughter of one day ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: and the woman Perhaps, For ??? he read the daughter of one day ??? They challenged this from a baraita: a woman yes. for me except a woman ??? the daughter of three two and one day ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: and the woman Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? rabbis ??? Which he read and which Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion Shall I say the daughter of one day Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion the daughter of three years and one day he read he read ??? it is written except the daughter of three two and one day Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion the daughter of one day he read and based on this lit: from after, ??? he read Why do I need

דף לב,ב גמרא

??? a man ??? and this one that teaches a woman yes. for me except a woman the daughter of ??? days ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: and the woman why do I have ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: of niddah then I might incorrectly say: a menstruant It is because of this: and so when ??? one day ??? but: ??? For if it was ??? one day ??? day opposite day ??? to it I would say it is not necessary to teach this ??? the Merciful One ??? and it does not require of niddah and I ??? without a menstruant yes. So, here, So rather, he read why do I have ??? a man ??? this one ??? one ??? one ??? seed and one ??? and thus in the matter of ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 15) a man a man Just as Scripture states: a man a man ??? the infant son of one day that he was become tamei ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi Yishmael his son of R' Yochanan son of ??? says it is not necessary Behold! he says (Lev. 15) ??? Any thing that was male, between that he was The greatness between that he was a child ??? all that it female between that is large between a small one If so, Just as Scripture states: a man a man ??? Torah ??? people Perhaps, For ??? he read son of one day ??? They challenged this from a baraita: a man yes. for me except a man son of nine two and one day from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 15) a man Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? rabbis ??? Which Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion and which he read Shall I say son of one day Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion son of ??? two and one day he read he read ??? it is written except son of ??? two and one day Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion son of day ??? he read And so based on this lit: from after, ??? She he read why do I have ??? a woman ??? why do I have ??? why do I have ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? that is not ??? I would say No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? that is not ??? I would say No. ??? impart tumah ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say For if it was that it is possible ??? upon them ??? them This is obvious! for it is the case that ??? them except that it should be ??? of ??? a menstruant ??? of One suffering from gonorrhea Just as ??? of One suffering from gonorrhea he does not become tamei except they eat ??? Even ??? of ??? a menstruant he does not become tamei except they eat ??? of One suffering from gonorrhea From where do we derive this? As it is written (Lev. 15) and all ??? in all who it shall be beneath it ??? What then does it mean when it says beneath it

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.