It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לז,א גמרא

He went ??? he said ??? for me ??? that is not ??? and let us say, for him for Rav, words ??? for him ??? they saw ??? for this ??? They said: Learn from this his male slave rabbis ??? he is required Raba ??? What then? ??? a thing ??? act of demolishing and that one also become tamei ??? a menstruant he or perhaps, a thing ??? act of demolishing and that one Is this not ??? he He said to him Abaye compulsion ??? He corrects that is not ??? He said to him: ??? This also ??? he For it was taught in a baraita he saw ??? the first they examine that specific the second they examine that specific the third yes. they examine that specific and to Rebbi Eliezer for he said: Even ??? they examine that specific So, here, immediately that is not is destiny? ??? No. ??? He said to him: to Rabbi Eliezer So, here, Come and hear: Rabbi Eliezer says: Even ??? they examine that specific ??? yes. they examine that specific Is this not ??? No. ??? by being carried Come and hear: ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: they examine that specific ??? yes. they examine that specific ??? Watch out for leading vav And I said and not ??? except ??? which is a matter that is not ??? act of demolishing According to the sages, What then does it mean when it says Come and hear: for it teaches: Avuah of Rabbi Avin: Just as ??? to him ??? seven For this reason act of demolishing seven Just as ??? to him ??? one day For this reason act of demolishing one day What then does it mean when it says seven Shall I say ??? seven This Just as ??? tamei seven he had asked for him except Is this not a thing ??? act of demolishing a thing that is not ??? he does not act of demolishing Learn from this Abayye said: ??? yes. ??? act of demolishing ??? and if ??? a Tanna taught: for he said: act of demolishing this particular ??? She It was taught: Rabbi ??? says yes. ??? They posed this difficulty: What then? ??? Abaye said It is not ??? It is not an elevation-offering Rava said: It is not ??? and ascend Rabba said: ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: and after ??? after after for all of them that ??? should not be among them If you say, This is satisfactory an elevation-offering we were that is not ??? except If you say, It is not an elevation-offering ??? for him ??? and Abaye said to you that ??? should not be a gonorrheal emission ??? among them Rabba said: ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: ??? and not ??? and not ??? and Abaye said to you One teaching ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? and Raba This What then does it mean when it says If you say, This is satisfactory ??? and not ??? for him ??? a Tanna taught: ??? because ??? except If you say, ??? and not ??? This (Lev. 15) ??? Watch out for leading vav "veyithar" ??? and not ??? and Abaye one in the case of a zav and one ??? and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote:

דף לז,ב גמרא

in the case of a zav It is because of this: that is not become tamei ??? but: ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? but: One suffering from gonorrhea ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this Abayye said: ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: (Lev. 12) ??? ??? the nights. ??? ??? seven ??? Is this not ??? No. ??? And Abaye said ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: ??? thus in the same way my days: ??? Just as my days: ??? yes. ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? seven an elevation-offering from them Even my days: ??? that do not ??? yes. ??? seven an elevation-offering from them and Raba So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi Eliezer She for he said: ??? also ??? And so ??? Rav said ??? son of Ami R' Eliezer She for he said: ??? And Rav Sheishet said on ??? the scripture that it is possible that they said Rav said ??? son of Ami Rav Sheshet said Rabbi Eliezer She for he said: ??? and Rav Papa said, on ??? three days ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? from this and from this What then? Rav Chisda he said that is tamei Rabbi ??? he said that is tahor Rabbi Chanina said: is from that which is belonging to of the king that went out ??? before him in his knowledge ??? of a king there are. and Rav Chisda he said all the more so who seeks ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: Rabbi Yehoshua says: night and the day ??? Sabbath and its day, ??? from ??? and not from the blood The reason is their blood ??? and not from the blood this one from this and from this that is tahor ??? of Rav Chisda Rav would say to you ??? No. -- why must that case be taught as well? from this and from this ??? them ??? but: from ??? and not from the blood I will say so that thus it will be ??? No. a division from ??? also No. a division from Hey, isn't it the case that ??? in reality he ??? to it Come and learn from this. We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? three days in the midst of one ten day ??? in the time of and she gave birth to Behold! This is she will give birth ??? How so? Shall I say ??? why do I have three it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? and one ??? except Is this not thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? three ??? from this and from this or ??? two ??? in the time of Behold! This is she will give birth ??? For R' ??? He could say to you Rabbi ??? No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and It is to learn from this ??? on the third ??? in the time of that is tamei To exclude ??? how much She ??? Rabbi Meir says: ??? now ??? forty ??? Rav Chisdah said There is no difficulty לא קשיא here, ??? here, ??? Thus said Rabbi Levi yes. ??? except days ??? to be of them ??? and Rav said: Even if ??? Rav Adda bar Ahava said and with his reasoning of Rav

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.