It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ד,א גמרא

Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? and R' Yochanan ??? one master reasons that this one ??? and one master reasons that ??? with ??? stillborn lit., fallen Hey, isn't it the case that is equivalent that a woman The tanna teaches: and the woman ??? She immediately ??? of it ??? is comparable And if you wish, I would say For ??? and Hallel ??? that is not it is covered Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? and Rabbi Yochanan ??? it is covered it is covered in what way does stillborn lit., fallen For example, ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that is equivalent that a woman The tanna teaches: and the woman it is covered She immediately ??? of it ??? it is covered is comparable And if you wish, I would say For ??? and Hallel ??? a large basket Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? and Rabbi Yochanan ??? the house of Hey, isn't it the case that a large basket he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: This is what he means: a large basket ??? of it ??? the house of -- this refers to ??? and it is found ??? reasoned No. ??? from one place to another place and Rabbi Yochanan reasoned ??? and who ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? on the first by night and he does not know if ??? if did he die tomorrow One who arose early and they found did he die ??? and the sages impart tumah for all of ??? It was taught by He ascended ??? in a place ??? And if you say What case is he dealing with? ??? but: ??? and who ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? or ??? that is tahor for all of ??? But why? Let us say, This from the beginning ??? that is elevated i.e., important She and now he ??? And furthermore, We have learnt in a Mishna: he found ??? atop ??? and thus ??? tahor for all of ??? And if you say ??? between ??? between ??? in a place ??? but: that did not have in a place ??? No. ??? For it was taught in a mishna: a loaf atop על גבי ??? tamei ??? beneath it despite the fact ??? "She has fallen ??? except If so, ??? that is tahor for I say a person tahor enter for the sake of lit. in the name of and took it away lit: and picked it up until ??? for me that did not have enter a person in that place and R' Elazar said No. ??? except to the place ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? The reason is

דף ד,ב גמרא

for I say a person tahor enter for the sake of lit. in the name of and took it away lit: and picked it up Here in this case, also, Let him say ??? he came ??? a person ??? say ??? we do not say ??? This a loaf doubt whether ??? in a personal domain he and all doubt whether ??? in a personal domain ??? tamei It is because of this: that there is a thing in which is not the understanding of ??? and any thing thing in which is not the understanding of ??? between in the public domain between in a private domain ??? tahor And if you wish, I could say Here in this case, ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? also where he teaches ??? as it is written (Lev. 26) He ascended ??? but the sages say No. in accordance with the words of this ??? The Rabbis taught but the sages say No. in accordance with the words of this and not in accordance with the words of this No. in accordance with the words of ??? that did not have One who acts a fence ??? and not in accordance with the words of Hallel ??? on ??? except ??? in the time of ??? on a hand ??? on a hand ??? in the time of ??? in the time of ??? on a hand ??? How so? ??? herself on the first day in the week ??? that is tahor ??? two and the third and not ??? that is tamei They do not say ??? except ??? in the time of ??? on a hand ??? in the time of How so? ??? herself at the hour the first ??? that is tahor ??? to it the second and the third and not ??? that is tamei They do not say ??? in the time of except ??? This is obvious! immediately ??? herself at the hour the first ??? that is tahor No. ??? to it ??? in the time of ??? on a hand ??? a Tanna taught: also ??? on a hand ??? in the time of Rabbah said What is the reasoning is a law established by the Rabbis a woman ??? on herself He said to him Abaye If so, shall be ??? and Rabbah ??? he who seeks Rather, what can we conclude? their reason is a law established by the Rabbis This is like for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said the sages ??? to them ??? Israel ??? morning, Arvit morning, ??? of night Arvit ??? of day -- this refers to Because and not ??? answer What then does it mean when it says answer answer ??? He said to him Rav ??? to Raba Hey, isn't it the case that Oftentimes It concerns itself three ??? in the time of ??? the sages ??? that did not have ??? in the time of If you wish, I would say that it should not be a sinner ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? and not ??? all a woman in which there is to it ??? Let us say, ??? R' ??? She and not rabbis as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer says four women ??? a virgin preganant may nurse ??? R' ??? says all a woman in which there is to it ??? even you say rabbis Up to this point, does not disagree rabbis upon it For R' ??? except that did not have in the hour of ??? but: in the hour of ??? for him Our mishna in the hour of ??? and the words of all are from this general principle it would follow For R' ??? even that did not have in the hour of ??? he said Which Tanna taught: about this teaching ??? a woman in which there is to it ??? tamei at the end of eating, before they leave ??? that did not have in the hour of ??? imparts tumah ??? in the time of Let him say It is the rabbis' position and not Rabbi ??? even you say Rabbi ??? No. ??? Rabbi ??? upon them is a law established by the Rabbis except in the hour of ??? but: that did not have in the hour of ??? he would acknowledge the correct position of them Our mishna in the hour of ??? and R' ??? She

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.