It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מו,א גמרא

and the reason ??? time he ??? to it ??? this one ??? time ??? time And furthermore, He challenged this "He" meaning... Rabbi Zeira (Num. 6) a man For ??? Just as Scripture states: a man ??? son of the 13th year" and one day ??? that is not know ??? How so? How should we understand this? If it was that is not Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it two ??? a child he except Is this not ??? two ??? and the reason ??? the 13th and one day he that he has i.e., that he is expected a man this one ??? time ??? time ??? he said ??? son of ??? two ??? two ??? and until Twelve year" and one day ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says a sign of son of the 13th year" and one day the words of all are a sign of this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? and until Twelve year" and one day ??? this one the 13th year" Back to the main body of the text: a sign of and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had It was taught by son of the 13th year" and one day a sign of this one the 13th year" Back to the main body of the text: ??? Is this not ??? She ??? reasoned ??? time ??? time and one master reasons that ??? time ??? time No. ??? time ??? time and this and this that a young girl and the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi and at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Shimon son of ??? And if you wish, I would say this one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? and the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi Shimon son of ??? and at the end of the teaching, Rabbi And if you wish, I would say this one Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi this one ??? this one that a young girl And if you wish, I could say this one Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi Shimon son of ??? this one ??? this one that a young girl Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says a sign of Thus said Rabbi ??? the son of Rabbi ??? This is only in the case ??? in it Another teaching is like this: son of ??? two and one day ??? two ??? and until Twelve year" and one day ??? in it ??? R' Yosi ??? Yehudah says a sign of Rabba said: ??? time ??? time Rav Shmuel son of ??? he would say over to it ??? of Raba ??? Rabba said: a small one all Twelve year" ??? from here and onwards It is not ??? It is not ??? this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? It is not ??? Perhaps, that is large She If it was that is large She ??? And if you say from doubt for him and who from doubt for him For didn't Raba say a small one ??? It is not it requires examination ??? signs that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? But here, in this case, ??? and not ??? No. If so, ??? lest ??? This is satistfactory ??? except ??? They do not concern What is there to say? ??? Rav Papa said, They do not concern lest ??? Rav ??? he said ??? What case is he dealing with? in the matter of chalitza but: in the matter of ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? in reality he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: But rather, in reality lit: in the world, that is not ??? and in the matter of chalitza there is a fear of them. And so he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Raba ??? but: ??? examination Rav said ??? Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? lest ??? and what case is he dealing with? in a case ??? in the midst of time and the master of after time That there are doubt a law established by the Torah but: from the beginning did not say Rav Huna ??? he ate ??? as it is said (Num. 6) a man For ??? (Num. 30) and not ??? His word all ??? and all that is not ??? he does not ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Huna the son of Yehuda ??? to Rav Huna.

דף מו,ב גמרא

on account of ??? the scripture ??? It is possible ??? he is liable on ??? sacrifice Scripture states: (Num. 30) this ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, ??? he is liable I would say ??? prohibits ??? Just as your soul If it was ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? a law established by the Torah ??? also ??? and if ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? Is this not a law established by the Torah prohibits also there is not in this case. ??? upon it Learn from this a child he eats ??? a court בית דין ??? upon it ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? he and he ate others This is satistfactory ??? he and he ate others ??? except ??? yes. ??? What is there to say? ??? he and he ate others Rav Kahana he said yes. ??? Rabbi Yochanan and Reish Lakish: that they said ??? According to Rabbinic law, and he read ??? in reality Back to the main body of the text: ??? and he ate others Rav Kahana he said yes. ??? Rabbi Yochanan and Reish Lakish: who both say ??? about what do they disagree? one master reasons that ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? a law established by the Torah and one master reasons that ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? According to Rabbinic law, He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? to it If you say, This is satisfactory ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis they came ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? is a law established by the Rabbis except If you say, a law established by the Torah they came ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? a law established by the Torah Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said ??? to it ??? your soul If it was is a law established by the Rabbis is a law established by the Rabbis he If it was a law established by the Torah a child he eats ??? he And there is no meaning to the word a court בית דין ??? upon it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that For ??? the first Rabbah said son of ??? to it all hour and hour This is only in the case ??? Hey, isn't it the case that yes. the master of ??? Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav Pinchas in the name of Raba for he said: Rav ??? in the name of Raba all ??? on the understanding of ??? She ??? Abayye said: Come and hear: a child that did not have ??? two ??? Rabbi Yehudah says yes. its terumah terumah Rabbi Yosei says: before it was even the case that came ??? nedarim-vows to bring an offering yes. its terumah terumah ??? nedarim-vows to bring an offering its terumah terumah ??? his reasoning is R' Yosi terumah in these times (nowadays) a law established by the Torah If you say, This is satisfactory ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? a law established by the Torah will come a person a law established by the Torah ??? a law established by the Torah except If you say, is a law established by the Rabbis will come a person is a law established by the Rabbis ??? a law established by the Torah No. his reasoning is Rabbi Yosei terumah in these times (nowadays) is a law established by the Rabbis reasoned R' Yosi terumah in these times (nowadays) is a law established by the Rabbis For it was taught: ??? the world (Deut. 30) who ??? the first and the second there is regarding them the third Watch out for leading vav And they do not have And R' Yochanan said Which Tanna taught: order of the world R' Yosi R' Yosi It was taught by to it And do you not reason, So, here, ??? as it is taught: ??? or ??? of terumah

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.