It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נ,א גמרא

Rabbi Meir She as it is taught: he was Rabbi Meir says: Just as Scripture states: (Deut. 21) on ??? it shall be all ??? and all ??? And so What is the connection between ??? next to leprous plague There is an analogy between ??? Just as leprous plague by day As it is written (Lev. 13) by day ??? in it Even ??? by day for just as leprous plague that did not have ??? As it is written (Lev. 13) for all ??? the eyes of ??? Even ??? that did not have ??? and There is an analogy between leprous plague ??? Just as ??? that did not have ??? Even leprous plague that did not have ??? If it was Just as ??? in a case where there are three Even leprous plague in a case where there are three It would be a logical inference ??? in a case where there are three ??? not all the more so? Scripture states: (Lev. 13) ??? to ??? or to one ??? the priests. this one ??? for even if a priest one one who sees ??? This certain individual ??? of Rabbi Yochanan ??? judgement and he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: for him and not something in what way does does he act? thus For didn't Rabbi Yochanan say The halacha is ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: all ??? is valid ??? and there are is valid ??? And there is no meaning to the word is valid ??? say it uses these particular words to include what? And Rabbi Yochanan said to include ??? in one ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? other than this ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? by day and They complete by night And what does it mean when it says ??? That this ??? If you wish, I would say ??? for many people is preferable And if you wish, I would say It is because of this: where he teaches to it regarding Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ???

דף נ,א משנה

all ??? become tamei ??? they eat and there are ??? they eat and he is not liable ???

דף נ,א גמרא

it uses these particular words to include what? to include meat and fish ???

דף נ,א משנה

all ??? he is liable ??? and there are ??? and he is not liable ???

דף נ,א גמרא

it uses these particular words to include what? to include fig tree ??? that is not he is liable ??? For it was taught in a baraita A general principle: And they said ??? Any thing that was he eats ??? from the land ??? he is liable ??? he eats ??? ??? from the land ??? fig tree ??? And even regarding tithe We have learnt in a Mishna: Any thing that was he eats ??? from the land he is liable ??? And even ??? No. The tanna teaches: if they were at them." ??? they are obligated For it was taught in a baraita ??? that are between ??? R' Yosei says ??? from all One and one but the sages say ??? on The entirety Rabbah bar bar Channah said that R' Yochanan said ??? to a domesticated animal but he had second thoughts about them to a person

דף נ,ב גמרא

require ??? his reasoning is ??? No. her name ??? Rabba said: Even We also ??? the 13th items ??? "uf" tahor and this is one of them it requires ??? It is not it requires ??? Perhaps, ??? life, No. her name ??? Here in this case, also, ??? No. her name ??? Rabbi Zeira he said Here in this case, ??? from ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) There was not ??? upon it He said to him Abaye ??? What is there to say? He said to him a rooster ??? it was. ??? upon it a rooster ??? "uf" tamei he and "uf" tamei who ??? He said to them Abaye a person Rava said: the validity No. ??? upon it with a chicken ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Rav Papa said, ??? Rav ??? with his reasoning for he said: Rav ??? a rooster ??? is forbidden ??? and not ??? rabbis ??? And this is like the position ??? The Rabbis taught ??? and upon it thought ??? tamei ??? tahor R' Yochanan son of ??? says Even ??? tamei that R' Yochanan said son of ??? is a kal vachomer if become tamei ??? is stricter that did not have ??? No. ??? lightweight that did not have ??? They said to him: No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? is stricter which provides It is not ??? shall you say ??? lightweight which provides ??? He said to them: ??? that did not have ??? They said to him: From here is there really proof? ??? they were in that place ??? upon it as regard to eating, with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? For what reason to it ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? livestock that is tahor in any place ??? "uf" tahor ??? It is not necessary for them No. ??? and not ??? except ??? and who that it is possible ??? that is not ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? livestock that is tamei in any place ??? "uf" tahor ??? it requires ??? It is not it requires ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? son of ??? In reality lit: In the world in a large city ??? that R' Yochanan said son of ??? if imparts tumah ??? is stricter that did not have ??? No. ??? lightweight that did not have ??? They said to him: No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? is stricter which provides It is not ??? What then does it mean when it says It is not ??? Rabba said: thus ??? for him No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that?

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.