It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נז,א גמרא

What then does it mean when it says ??? (Deut. 19) No. ??? who ??? all in which there is to him ??? he has ??? all that do not to him ??? he (??? ) does not have they are believed to say ??? Hey, isn't it the case that who does not have (Lev. 19) and before ??? No. ??? R' Abahu said ??? in that place and perhaps, a priest tamei he ??? terumah in his hands and perhaps, terumah it is tamei ??? If so, what is there to say? What would you have said? No. ??? are believed on ??? Hey, isn't it the case that who does not have and before ??? No. ??? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said ??? If so, what is there to say? What would you have said? No. ??? are believed on ??? and even though ??? he immediately ??? of him. As it is written (Ezek. 39) and he saw ??? a person he built opposite him. ??? but: yes. are believed Not on ??? For it was taught in a baraita These are ??? tree placing it on the loom on the land ??? For it was taught in a baraita stones ??? from the hedge the house of ??? R' Yehudah said: Thus said Rabbi Shmuel ??? a person the house of ??? and brought Rav Yehudah son of Ami in the name of Rav Yehudah he said the house of ??? tahor and it was taught the plowing the house of ??? Behold! this makes the house of ??? and up to how much he makes fill ??? hundred cubits the house of ??? Rabbi Yosei says: ??? and not ??? For it was taught: field ??? of it a grave." faithfully a Cuthean to say there is not there a grave." on account of that is not he testified except on ??? of a grave." tree that he was and placing it on the loom on the land faithfully to say yes. beneath it a grave." on account of that is not he testified except on ??? of a grave." that R' Yochanan said ??? came on All of it If so, what is there to say? What would you have said? ??? This is the general rule: ??? This is the general rule: it uses these particular words to include what? to include ??? and wine ???

דף נז,ב משנה

the one who sees ??? on ??? opposite the house of ??? that is tamei or in the case that one is not opposite the house of ??? that is tahor on ??? and on the tip of ??? that is tamei on ??? and on ??? that is tamei ??? that is tahor and on ??? from here and from here i.e., on both sides of the passage that is tahor she saw on ??? from ??? to the bottom that is tamei from ??? and onwards that is tahor she saw on the house of a hand of ??? if ??? opposite the house of ??? that is tamei And if not, that is tahor it was ??? in it by night in all places ??? in it ??? that is tamei because it was he returns and thus ???

דף נז,ב גמרא

Shmuel said ??? the world ??? upon it ??? blood upon it that is tahor as it is said (Lev. 15) ??? until ??? This ??? should bring himself ??? inside ??? If so, Let Scripture say in the case of the flesh. What then does it mean when it says ??? Learn from this until ??? should bring himself ??? and not with a fetus and not ??? both Learn from this Come and hear: the his wife that it makes ??? and she saw blood Rabbi Meir says: if is standing that is tamei and if ??? that is tahor How so? If it was ??? why is it that that is tahor except Is this not that is not ??? And we have learned is standing that is tamei In reality lit: In the world ??? who pilgrimage festivals ??? is standing ??? pilgrimage festivals ??? and he carried it blood ??? that is tahor Come and hear: until that he was ??? under ??? and it is found upon it blood if a circle-cake tahor and if straight tamei How so? If it was ??? a circle-cake why is it that tahor except Is this not that is not ??? And we have learned straight tamei No. In reality lit: In the world ??? until ??? straight certainly ??? he came a circle-cake tahor Come and hear: Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found on are his ??? and they are obligated ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found on of it ??? and they are obligated ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found on of it after time ??? and are exempt from ??? How so? If it was ??? after time why is it that are exempt from ??? except Is this not that is not ??? And we have learned Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found on of it ??? and they are obligated ??? No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and so go ahead and say ??? sun it was. Come and hear: ??? You say three ??? on ??? doubt whether tamei doubt whether tahor tamei on ??? doubt whether tamei doubt whether tahor tahor ??? he has walked after ??? What then does it mean when it says he has walked after ??? Is this not if most of ??? that is tamei and even though that is not ??? No. if most of ??? that is tamei ??? Is this not ??? Mar said: on ??? doubt whether tamei doubt whether tahor tamei on ??? doubt whether tamei doubt whether tahor tahor How so? How should we understand this? If it was ??? to the bottom on ??? why is it that tahor Hey, isn't it the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: from ??? to the bottom tamei and if ??? and onwards on ??? why is it that tamei For it was taught in a mishna: she saw blood on ??? that did not have opposite the house of ??? that is tahor Watch out for leading vav And if you wish, I could say ??? to the bottom And if you wish, I could say ??? and onwards If you like, I could say ??? to the bottom For example, ??? of ??? on ??? For if it was ??? on ??? should bring himself ??? on ??? he came For if it was ??? he came on ??? should bring himself ??? And if you wish, I would say ??? and onwards For example, ??? on ??? certainly ??? For if it was ??? on ??? It was necessary for him ??? on ??? For if it was ??? on ??? It was necessary for him ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, on ??? doubt whether tamei doubt whether tahor tamei and even though that is not ??? And furthermore, We have learnt in a Mishna: the one who sees ??? on ??? opposite the house of ??? that is tamei and even though that is not ??? Rav said ??? give thanks Shmuel that it that is tamei

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.