It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נח,א גמרא

According to Rabbinic law, Rav Ashi said: Shmuel he for he said: ??? For it was taught in a baraita R' ??? says any thing that is not he accepts ??? he does not he accepts ??? This is satisfactory to Rav Ashi we were for he says ??? except for Rav, ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? even ??? also No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? that is not ??? then the ruling is acceptable. and there are to say ??? he came except even ??? then the ruling is acceptable. That there are to say ??? We come to compare ??? on ??? and on the tip of ??? that is tamei ??? This is satisfactory ??? does he act? ??? a place except the tip of ??? What is the reason? And if you say Oftentimes ??? and who ??? from one place to another place For it was taught: it was to it ??? on ??? that is not would find it possible ??? It is not ??? They do not say lest ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of except that I the tip of ??? does he act? ??? and not ??? from one place to another place For it was taught: ??? on ??? that is tamei because of ??? there are. What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? No. that I ??? on ??? and on ??? until in a case They said: of the academy of Rabbi ??? until a place ??? They posed this difficulty: a place ??? or ??? Come and hear: For Rav learned: ??? until a place ??? himself ??? Rav Chiyya the son of of Rav ??? he would say over to it clearly and explicitly They said: of the academy of Rabbi ??? until a place ??? himself ??? he is required Rabbi ??? What then? ??? What then? ??? What then? ??? What then? Come and hear: on ??? doubt whether tamei doubt whether tahor tamei on ??? Is this not For This ??? No. Perhaps that He performs ??? this particular ??? to it the blood ??? in front of Rabbi ??? he said to it ??? For it was taught: yes. ??? For say yes. ??? but: ??? it was ??? It was taught: ??? This item ??? in the city ??? When I went next to the sages ??? They said to me: proper ??? The Rabbis taught long ??? of short and short ??? of long if ??? opposite the house of ??? of long ??? And if not, long that is tahor and short that is tamei Another teaching ??? She that is tahor ??? of it Rav Sheshet said and in the matter of judgement We have learnt in a Mishna: but: in the matter of ??? She that is tahor ??? that is tamei

דף נח,ב גמרא

what is the difference here, ??? as it is taught: two women ??? one And there is no meaning to the word in it except ??? blood and it is found ??? on -- this refers to ??? on -- this refers to ??? It is different there in that case That there are a sela coin ??? The Rabbis taught ??? three ??? to it if would find it possible ??? and even ??? yes. would find it possible ??? It is not ??? And even if ??? How so? ??? of ??? even ??? No. ??? of ??? Even ??? It is not ???

דף נח,ב משנה

??? in all a thing that it would find it possible ??? it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it livestock raw lit., living and "uf" ??? or ??? beside ??? of them ??? Behold! This is ??? of it up to how much ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? says until ??? of ??? And even ??? that did not have ??? or ??? if there are of it ??? but it would find it possible ??? and to discharge the mitzvah blood Behold! This is ??? It once happened ??? One ??? before Rabbi Akiva he said to him I saw ??? he said to it lest ??? it was ??? he said to him there are. ??? he said to it lest would find it possible ??? and to discharge the mitzvah blood he said to him there are. ??? Rabbi Akiva he saw ??? this to that He said to them: Just as ??? Difficult is ??? that did not have the sages said ??? except ??? as it is said (Lev. 15) and the woman For ??? blood it shall be ??? blood and not ??? until that he was ??? under ??? and it is found upon it blood a circle-cake tahor straight tamei these are the words of ???

דף נח,ב גמרא

??? about this teaching ??? It once happened ??? And Rabbi ??? or ??? yes. No. ??? No. ??? about this teaching ??? of ??? doubt whether ??? upon it doubt whether No. ??? upon it ??? doubt whether ??? doubt whether No. ??? yes. No. ??? No. ??? with whom does it agree? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel She as it is taught: ??? No. ??? It is not ??? these are the words of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel but the sages say whether like this or whether like that ??? he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel according to the words of yes. ??? and according to the words of ??? yes. the end of according to the words of yes. ??? that do not to you a woman ??? for her husband. that do not to you all a bed and a bed where there is not in it how much ??? blood ??? according to the words of ??? yes. the end of that do not to you a woman that is not that is tahor for her husband. that do not to you all ??? in which is not how much ??? blood but: can be seen these are the words of R' Chaninah son of ??? in words of ??? that he was says up to how much She ??? until ??? of ??? do we "We thank..." and According to the sages, that they said ??? up to how much he said ??? son of Isaac ??? and until ??? The Rabbis taught examines this ??? covenant ??? to him for all of ??? in it ??? in the matter of ??? in the matter of terumah For it was taught in a baraita or ??? examines in his mouth behold! This is הרי זה ??? know ??? know covenant ??? to him for all of ??? in it Rav Ashi said a city in which there is pigs They do not concern ??? he said ??? son of Isaac Hey, isn't it the case that ??? in which there is pigs ??? up to how much She ??? Rav Huna said ??? It is not ??? less than ??? and Rav Chisda he said ??? It is not ??? Let us say, ??? and until are in the general category ??? For Rav Huna reasoned until and not until are in the general category and Rav Chisda reasoned until and until are in the general category Rav would say to you ??? that it is possible until and until are in the general category and there are until and not until are in the general category and here in this other case, ??? and here in this other case, ??? and Rav Chisda He could say to you in reality I would say to you ??? say ??? we do not say and here in this other case, ??? for thus said Rabbi ??? all ??? the sages ??? except ??? of ??? that it is possible that they said to it about this teaching ??? in the presence of ??? Rav Huna he said ??? and Rav Chisda he said ??? and what they disagree about ??? and until ??? since we say: They challenged him from this teaching:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.