It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ח,א גמרא

??? a minor female ??? in it And Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said The halacha is ??? Eliezer For Shmuel said The halacha is ??? Eliezer ??? but: in the remainder of ??? that it is possible ??? So, here, ??? For it was taught in a baraita R' Eliezer says: Even ??? he gives ??? And Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said The halacha is ??? Learn from this And what does it mean when it says ??? That this ??? It is because of this: and it was standing Rabbi Eliezer ??? For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Eliezer says ??? a minor female ??? in it and who he arises Hey, isn't it the case that ??? them and not ??? except It is because of this: and it was standing Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? Hashem items ??? ??? the his wife ??? a single witness ??? a rooster in Jerusalem on ??? ??? and on wine son of ??? day ??? atop על גבי the altar of and on The Tamid-offering of the morning ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Is this not one For R' ??? and one of Rabbi Eliezer No. What then does it mean when it says ??? of the world If so, regarding a woman also ??? women And let him say women of the world except ??? The tanna teaches: a woman and here in this other case, The tanna teaches: ??? Learn from this ??? The tanna teaches: Learn from this and thus R' Elazar said The halacha is ??? And, too, there is not in this case. For it was taught in a mishna: Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? a minor female ??? in it and R' Elazar said The halacha is ??? And if you say For R' Elazar said The halacha is ??? but: in the remainder of ??? that it is possible and who that it is possible For it was taught in a mishna: ??? there is regarding them ??? there is regarding them burning ??? burning and R' Pedat said: Which Tanna taught: ??? and R' Zayra said: Look, ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? Which Tanna taught: ??? and your father: he said The halacha is ??? and if ??? Let us say, for him For he said Abba The halacha is ??? but: in the remainder of ??? that it is possible except it is a problem this particular It is because of this: and it was standing Rabbi Eliezer ??? For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Eliezer says ??? a minor female ??? in it and who he arises Hey, isn't it the case that ??? them and not ??? except It is because of this: and it was standing Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? And, too, there is not in this case. For it was taught in a mishna: Rabbi Akiva says: it is said as the fourth blessing in its own right R' Eliezer says: it is said ??? and R' Elazar said The halacha is ??? Thus said Rabbi Abba This certain individual for he said: It is because of this: Rabbi ??? son of ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Akiva says: it is said as the fourth blessing in its own right Rabbi ??? son of ??? says it is said ???

דף ח,ב גמרא

Hey, isn't it the case that ??? of him ??? except It is because of this: and it was standing Rabbi ??? son of ??? and who he arises For it was taught: light Yom Kippur. he prays "satisfied" ??? morning, he prays "satisfied" ??? he prays "satisfied" ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) he prays "satisfied" ??? he prays "satisfied" ??? in the evening? he prays "satisfied" a summary of the Eighteen i.e., the Amidah Rabbi ??? son of ??? It is because of this: ??? says he prays the Eighteen i.e., the Amidah because of ??? Havdalah in "Who grants understanding" he said ??? son of Isaac ??? he said It is because of this: ??? for him No. he reasons, He said to him R' ??? to R' Zeira and No. ??? a Tanna taught: ??? he For it was taught in a mishna: Rabbi Eliezer says ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree is forbidden even you say rabbis ??? does not disagree rabbis upon it ??? except ??? but: ??? for him For it was taught in a baraita R' Yehoshua said: I hear in a clarifying explanation ??? is permitted. ??? is forbidden because it was ??? And if you wish, I would say Because specifically, where they disagree is this: rabbis upon it ??? by a tree One who makes fruits but: by a tree that is not makes fruits ??? For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Shimon says: yes. ??? but the sages say there are ??? because of ??? one the sages Is this not rabbis ??? upon it ??? He said to him This certain individual elder thus that R' Yochanan said one the sages ??? for he said: ??? If it was ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of tree that is not makes ??? even tree One who makes ??? to their words is a law established by the Rabbis he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them To me Even if tree One who makes fruits also ??? for me Regardless, by a tree that is not makes fruits ??? And the rabbbis say for him No. ??? What is an example of one a virgin all that did not have she saw ??? The Rabbis taught gets married and she saw blood ??? nisuin the sanctification of the marriage she gave birth to and she saw blood ??? I reads to it a virgin for behold! a virgin where they said the virgin of ??? and not the virgin of virginity Really? For didn't Rav Kahana say a Tanna taught: three ??? there are. the virgin of a person the virgin of ??? the virgin of ??? the virgin of a person The whole time that did not have ??? practical distinction ??? two hundred the virgin of ??? that did not have ??? practical distinction ??? the virgin of ??? that did not have ??? practical distinction ??? So, too, ??? in the seventh year ??? yes. ??? the virgin of ??? in the seventh year because of that it the blessing of the Service and if ??? Let the Tanna teach: also this statement that he said poses a contradiction: ??? son of Isaac And this is what the tanna means to teach: something the one who does not have in that place ??? but: something is what he has in that place ??? No. The tanna teaches: Rav Sheishet the son of of Rav This he said And this is what the tanna means to teach: something ??? in the works of something that is not He hangs in the works of No. The tanna teaches: Rabbi ??? the son of of Rav ??? he said And this is what the tanna means to teach: something that is not he returns ??? something ??? No. The tanna teaches: Ravina he said And this is what the tanna means to teach: something ??? upon it ??? something that is not ??? upon it ??? No. The tanna teaches: and not ??? For it was taught: Rabbi Chiyya says in the same way ??? proper ??? thus in the same way ??? and it was taught: It is because of this: ??? all a woman ??? except And this is what the tanna means to teach: something ??? upon it ??? something that is not ??? upon it ??? No. The tanna teaches: The Rabbis taught Which are they the virgin of ??? all ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found of it pottery in his knowledge ??? Behold! This is the virgin of ??? preganant ??? and how much time is the duration of ??? who transgress ??? says It is because of this: Rabbi Meir three months And even though there isn't proof for the matter there is an allusion to the matter as it is said (Gen. 38) And it was ??? months he completes there is an allusion to the matter he read it is written and proof that is large She It is because of this: That there are ??? and there are ??? The Rabbis taught Behold! ??? of a presumption that preganant and she saw blood and after this ??? wind of or any thing that is not of ??? Behold! She ??? and even though there isn't proof for the matter there is an allusion to the matter as it is said (Is. 26) ??? just as ??? wind of What then does it mean when it says there is an allusion to the matter Behold! proof that is large She For it is written This he read ??? it is written We challenge that from the following baraita ??? two ??? wind of or any thing that is not of ??? Behold! This is she will give birth ??? And if you say ??? that is elevated i.e., important She

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.