It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ה,א גמרא

??? yes. ??? did not say R' Ya'akov R' Yochanan said: They did not teach such a ruling except that do not many they all require to them but: many they all require to them even ??? is permitted. And so many they all require to them who Sarai For it was taught: ??? of an individual and it is not necessary to say of many And there is no meaning to the word ??? of many and it is not necessary to say of an individual Is this not ??? they all require to them No. ??? many they all require to them ??? regarding an individual that do not an individual It is necessary for him to them ??? who Sarai For it was taught: ??? of an individual ??? water into their midst but not ??? and not ??? ??? and of many ??? those particular ??? ??? and Rather, what can we conclude? ??? It is necessary for him to them ??? regarding many ??? they all require to them ??? who ??? For it was taught: ??? of an individual ??? water into their midst ??? those particular but not ??? ??? and not ??? into their midst and not ??? those particular with lime and of many ??? those particular ??? those particular with lime except it is a problem ??? the first ??? thus ??? of an individual ??? It is necessary for him to them and it is not necessary to say ??? many ??? they all require to them that even ??? is permitted. And there is no meaning to the word ??? of many ??? many they all require to them and it is not necessary to say of an individual and so when yes. an individual It is necessary for him to them even ??? he also forbids it. Rav Ashi said Our mishna also ??? where he teaches doing all ??? many all it uses these particular words to include what? Is this not to include ??? No. to include this one that teaches ??? ??? ??? and ??? ??? and all ??? in which is not forty ??? to its midst forty ??? And from where do we learn ??? they have not fulfilled the mitzvah "and they shall make all these for all of ??? in that place ??? upon them the scripture it is as if are these ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 19) and it was the case that upon you ??? this one clearly and explicitly The tanna teaches: to it ??? ??? and ??? and ??? doing all ??? many it uses these particular words to include what? Is this not to include ??? "Hear!" ??? ??? he said Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi: ??? from the Torah from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Ezek. 39) and he saw ??? a person he built opposite him. ??? He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi this one ??? one he said ??? this one for he said: Rav Chisda This item ??? Moses our rabbi, No. we have learned in words of ??? son of ??? we have learned (Ezek. 44) all son of ??? heart ??? meat No. ??? to ??? one he said except a tradition has been handed down and he came ??? I invoke, Here in this case, also, a tradition has been handed down and he came ??? I invoke, Rabbi Abahu he said from here (Lev. 13) and tamei tamei he should read ??? to him and she says to him ??? and thus he said Rabbi ??? son of the son of Rabbi ??? Rabbah ??? to him and she says to him ??? and that one ??? he who has arrived This certain individual should bring himself to account for that which was taught and tamei tamei he should read It is necessary for him ??? to the public and many ??? upon it mercies If so, ??? and tamei he should read What then does it mean when it says and tamei tamei ??? both Abaye said from here (Lev. 19) and before ??? No. ??? Rav Papa said, (Is. 57) and he said ??? a way Rav ??? he said ??? with me" R' Yehoshua the son of of Rav This he said (Ex. 18) ??? to them ??? shall go of it Mar Zutra he said (Lev. 15) ??? the Children of Israel ??? Rav Ashi said: (Lev. 18) ??? ??? they make ??? Ravina he said (Ps. 50) in that place a way ??? God ??? all the Name ??? he merits ??? of the Holy One, Who is Blessed as it is said in that place a way We will suggest an alternate reading of this text: Do not read in that place except in that place a way ??? God Rabbi ??? it was. for him There was this student, ??? day it was. ??? for him on the Sabbath ??? It was not ??? for him

דף ה,ב גמרא

a seminal emission upon it (Ps. 50) in that place a way ??? God The rabbis taught: yes. ??? Not on an olive's volume from the dead and not on ??? and not on a thing that is not become tamei ??? but: ??? on ??? and on ??? on most of ??? and on most of from where do we learn the dead And there is no meaning to the word ??? on ??? but: ??? on ??? and they are ??? the house of ??? We do not board ??? in a place ??? that did not have ??? ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? that did not have ??? the Land of Israel and an olive's volume from the dead he does not become tamei ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? these ??? an olive's volume from the dead Rav Pappa said: Here in this case, in the amount like an olive ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? the end of ??? lacking that is good for him ??? upon it terumah and holy offerings on account of hour and do not ??? upon it In reality lit: In the world and they are ??? tree placing it on the loom on the land ??? stones ??? from the hedge the house of ??? the plowing ??? Behold! he makes the house of ??? and how much time is the duration of he makes fill ??? hundred cubits the house of ??? who become tamei ??? For didn't Rav Yehudah say Shmuel said ??? a person the house of ??? and brought and Rav Yehudah son of Ami in the name because of Ulla he said the house of ??? tahor Rav Pappa said: There is no difficulty. here, in the field ??? of it a grave." here, in the field ??? of it a grave." ??? of it a grave." the house of ??? a seminal emission for him yes. For it was taught in a mishna: three the house of ??? there are. field ??? of it a grave." ??? of it a grave." ??? What then does it mean when it says field ??? Rav Joshua son of Abba in the name because of Ulla he said field ??? of it the dead and the reason What then does it mean when it says he said ??? It is because of this: ??? of it ??? of it a grave." it does not require ??? and this was taught! he found field ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Just as ??? there is trees in his knowledge ??? of it a grave." there is not there trees in his knowledge ??? of it a grave." R' Yehuda says: until that it should be in that place an elderly person or ??? on account of that do not The entirety ??? In the matter Rav Pappa said: For this teaching in the field ??? of it a grave." ??? there is trees in his knowledge ??? of it a grave." there is not there trees in his knowledge ??? of it a grave." ??? Perhaps trees ??? and a grave." ??? Like that which was said by ??? on ??? Here in this case, also, ??? on ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.